动机性信息加工理论及其在工业与组织心理学中的应用
Motivated Information Processing Model: Theory and Applications
查看参考文献58篇
|
文摘
|
"团队作为信息加工者的观点"认为,团队执行复杂任务需要经过一系列认知决策,哪些信息被共享,以及信息共享和整合的质量,共同决定团队效能的高低。动机性信息加工理论则进一步提出,认知动机和社会动机共同决定了哪些信息被共享,以及信息共享和整合的质量。认知动机决定信息加工的深度,社会动机决定信息加工的方向,两种动机共同决定决策质量。这一理论可以很好地整合谈判和创造力领域的研究结果,并在团队效能领域得到很好的应用。动机性信息加工理论是对双过程模型和"团队作为信息加工者观点"的发展和整合,并为决策质量的影响因素提供新的分类框架和研究思路。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Based on "groups as information processor perspective", motivated information processing (MIP) model emphasizes that information processing and sharing depends on two types of motivations, epistemic motivation and social motivation, respectively. Epistemic motivation refers to the willingness to expend effort to achieve a thorough, rich, and accurate understanding of the world. It determines the depth of information processing. Social motivation is defined as the individual preference for outcome distributions between oneself and others. It influences which information will be processed. Epistemic motivation and social motivation, alone and in combination, interpret information processing at both individual and team level, and information sharing at team level. MIP model contributes to the industrial/organizational psychology literature by integrating the dual-process theory and groups as information processor perspective, and by providing a new perspective in the fields of negotiation, creativity, and team effectiveness. Limitations and implications for future study of MIP model are discussed. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2012,20(11):1889-1898 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
动机性信息加工理论
;
认知动机
;
社会动机
;
团队
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论;药学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4694090
|
参考文献 共
58
共3页
|
|
1.
刘雪峰. 认知闭合需要、框架效应与决策偏好.
心理学报,2007,39:611-618
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
张志学. 组织心理学研究的情境化及多层次理论.
心理学报,2010,42:10-21
|
被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Amabile T M.
Creativity in context,1996
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Baer M. The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2006,91:963-970
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Bechtoldt M N. Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2010,99:622-637
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Beersma B. Negotiation processes and outcomes in prosocially and egoistically motivated groups.
International Journal of Conflict Management,1999,10:385-402
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Cacioppo J T. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition.
Psychological Bulletin,1996,119:197-253
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Chaiken S.
Dual-process theories in social psychology,1999
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Chao M M. Adherence to perceived norms across cultural boundaries: The role of need for cognitive closure and ingroup identification.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,2010,13:69-89
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Chen G. Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2011,96:541-557
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Chirumbolo A. Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions.
European Journal of Personality,2004,18:265-278
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Chirumbolo A. Motivated closed-mindedness and creativity in small groups.
Small Group Research,2005,36:59-82
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Chiu C Y. Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000,78:247-259
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Choi H S. Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2004,40:273-280
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
De Dreu C K W. Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2003,91:280-295
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
De Dreu C K W. Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92:628-638
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
De Dreu C K W. Team confidence, motivated information processing, and dynamic group decision making.
European Journal of Social Psychology,2010,40:1110-1119
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
De Dreu C K W. Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006,90:927-943
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
De Dreu C K W. Share and share alike or winner take all?: The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1998,76:253-276
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
De Dreu C K W. Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 35),2003:235-291
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问