决策中的图形框架效应
Graph-framing Effects in Decision Making
查看参考文献44篇
|
文摘
|
决策框架效应作为一种违背不变性原则的非理性偏差,已经得到研究的广泛证实。本研究突破了传统研究中主要由语言描述引发框架效应的限制,从图形表征这一新的视角对图形框架效应做了深入探讨。本研究共包括6个实验,通过操纵选项在不同图形表征版本中物理属性差异的突出性,发现在表达信息不变的情况下,人们判断和决策的偏好会受到图形表征的影响,即出现了图形框架效应。研究结果表明,图形框架效应普遍存在于各种决策情境以及各种图形表征方式中。基于属性替代理论和齐当别原则,我们提出了一种解释图形框架效应内部作用机制的两阶段心理加工模型--图形编辑的齐当别模型(The Graph-edited Equate-to-differentiate Model,GEM)。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
In contrast to the axiom of description invariance, researchers interested in decision framing effects are accumulating evidence that different representations of the same problem do not yield the same preference. Traditional research on framing effects has commonly utilized verbal scenarios. In contrast, the current study manipulated the graphical representation of options by framing the physical characters in figures and found that preferences could be affected even when the words and numbers of the problem were constant. Our evidence showed that such graph framing effects could be detected across different types of graphical displays and different question scenarios. Based on attribute substitution theory and an equate-to-differentiate approach, we proposed a two-process model of graph framing effects: The Graph- edited Equate-to-differentiate Model (GEM). |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2012,20(11):1718-1726 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
决策
;
框架效应
;
图形表征
;
齐当别模型
;
不变性原则
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金国家杰出青年科学基金
;
北京市重点学科建设项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4694072
|
参考文献 共
44
共3页
|
|
1.
Armstrong L. Stimulus context, perceived length, and the horizontal-vertical illusion.
Perception & Psychophysics,1997,59:1200-1213
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Attneave F. The time required to compare extents in various orientations.
Perception & Psychophysics,1974,16:431-436
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Baron R M. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51:1173-1182
|
被引
897
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Bonini N. Contingent application of the cancellation editing operation: The role of semantic relatedness between risky outcomes.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2004,17:139-152
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Dehaene S. The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data.
Perception & Psychophysics,1989,45:557-566
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Fagley N S. Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life?.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1997,71:355-373
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Fias W. Parietal representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2003,15:47-56
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Gamliel E. Attribute framing affects the perceived fairness of health care allocation principles.
Judgment and Decision Making,2010,5:11-20
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Hamilton R. Perceptual focus effects in choice.
Journal of Consumer Research,2007,34:187-199
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Huff D.
How to lie with statistics,1954
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Jarvenpaa S L. Graphic displays in decision making: The visual salience effect.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,1990,3:247-262
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.
American Psychologist,2003,58:697-720
|
被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Kahneman D. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive thought,2002:49-81
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Kahneman D. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.
Econometrica,1979,47:263-291
|
被引
1130
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Krider R E. Pizzas: Pi or squared? Psychophysical biases in area comparisons.
Marketing Science,2001,20:405-425
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Kuhberger A. Risky choice framing: Task versions and a comparison of prospect theory and fuzzy-trace theory.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2010,23:314-329
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Leland J W. Generalized similarity judgments: An alternative explanation for choice anomalies.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1994,9:151-172
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Levin I P. Associative effects of information framing.
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,1987,25:85-86
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Levin I P. How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product.
Journal of Consumer Research,1988,15:374-378
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Levin I P. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1998,76:149-188
|
被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问