框架效应中的个体差异
The Individual Differences of the Framing Effect
查看参考文献52篇
|
文摘
|
框架效应是指框架的改变导致个体对同一问题的备择方案产生偏好转变的现象。Tversky和Kahneman的系列研究证实框架效应普遍存在,但是随着研究的深入,众多研究者发现个体特征会影响框架效应的稳定性,这些个体特征主要包括人格、认知能力、认知风格、年龄和性别等。我们将来应该进一步从认知和情绪的角度,全面研究框架效应个体差异的心理机制,构建动态、综合的框架效应理论模型。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Framing effect is a phenomenon that an individual has different preference to the alternative programs on the same issue due to different frames.A series of research,conducted by Tversky and Kahneman,confirmed the prevalence of the framing effect.However,with further study,many researchers have found that individual characteristics,mainly including personality,cognitive ability,cognitive style,age,gender and so on,have an impact on the stability of the framing effect.In the future,to explain the individual difference of the framing effect better,a dynamic,integrated model needs to be developed,in which the cognition and emotion are considered together. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2012,20(6):894-901 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
框架效应
;
人格
;
认知
;
情绪
|
|
地址
|
华中师范大学心理学院, 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室;;湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室, 武汉, 430079
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4578150
|
参考文献 共
52
共3页
|
|
1.
白湘云. 行为与情绪的框架效应及其与个性的关系.
心理科学,2007,30(6):1321-1323
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
杜秀芳. 框架效应研究30年的变迁.
济南大学学报(社会科学版),2010,20(3):71-74
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
梁竹苑. 决策中个体差异研究现状述评.
心理科学进展,2007,15(4):689-694
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
刘雪峰. 认知闭合需要、框架效应与决策偏好.
心理学报,2007,39(4):611-618
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Bandura A. Analysis of selfefficacy theory of behavioral change.
Cognitive Therapy and Research,1977,1(4):287-310
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Chaiken S. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context.
Unintended Thought,1989:212-252
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Cheng F F. Debiasing the framing effect: The effect of warning and involvement.
Decision Support Systems,2010,49:328-334
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Chong D. Framing public opinion in competitive democracies.
American Political Science Review,2007,101(4):637-655
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Epstein S. Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality.
Handbook of Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology,2003,5:159-184
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Epstein S. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,71:390-405
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Fagley N S. Effects of framing, perspective taking, and perspective (affective focus) on choice.
Personality and Individual Differences,2010,48(3):264-269
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Fagley N S. The effect of framing on choice: Interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1990,16(3):496-510
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Fagley N S. Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life?.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1997,71(3):355-373
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Fujimoto H. Framing effects and gender differences in voluntary public goods provision experiments.
The Journal of Socio-Economics,2010,39(4):455-457
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Gachter S. Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experiment.
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2009,70(3):443-446
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Gonzales C. The framing effect and risky decisions: Examining cognitive functions with fMRI.
Journal of Economic Psychology,2005,26:1-20
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Hasseldine J. Framing, gender and tax compliance.
Journal of Economic Psychology,2003,24(4):517-533
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Higgins E T. Making a good decision: Value from fit.
American Psychologist,2000,55:1217-1230
|
被引
35
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Huang Y H. Sex differences in framing effects across task domain.
Personality and Individual Differences,2010,48(5):649-653
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Kahneman D. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.
Econometrica,1979,47(2):263-292
|
被引
1130
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问