区域规划评估理论与方法研究进展
A Literature Review of Progress in Regional Plan Assessment Theory and Methodology
查看参考文献51篇
|
文摘
|
区域规划作为统筹区域资源,协调区域发展的重要手段日益受到重视。而实际上,区域规划在实施阶段却面临困境,已经确定的规划在实施过程中不断被修改甚至瓦解。规划在发挥更大作用的同时,也受到更多的批评。这是由于规划及其实施是一个长期过程,充满了种种不确定性因素的影响。为了使规划达到最佳效能,必须时刻结合实际情况对规划进行评估,从而不断对规划产生反馈,进行必要调整。因此,规划评估是确保区域规划有效实施的必要环节,不仅在宏观意义上有助于区域规划社会地位的建立和巩固,还有助于理解既有规划的不足,了解失效的原因,对区域规划的有效推进无疑具有现实意义。然而当前区域规划评估的研究与应用相对滞后。基于此,本文在回顾国内外规划评估大量研究文献的基础上,指出区域规划评估经历了从"当作终极蓝图的规划编制成果"到"整个决策到实施的过程"的转向,同时结合评估价值观的演变归纳了当前最为流行的评估方法,以及影响规划实施效果的因素,并对今后的研究提出了设想。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Regional planning has been increasingly regarded as an important way to manage regional resources and coordinate regional development.Practically,regional planning is in face of severe challenges in its implementation stage.Plans are always revised or even collapsed during the actual implementation process.Presently the work of planning is attracting more and more concerns,as well as criticisms.One of the reasons that planning fails in implementation lies in the reason that planning is,by nature,a long-term procedure,which involves a lot of uncertainties.Plans should be evaluated according to the real situation to generate feedbacks and carry out necessary adjustments,so that plans could achieve their best efficiency.Therefore,evaluation is considered as an indispensable process that can ensure the plans will be implemented successfully.Evaluation is not only necessary for building up and stabilizing the social status of regional planning,bu also helpful for understanding the defects and the failure of plans so that evaluation would practically promote the progress of planning in the future.However,research and application of evaluation falls behind regional planning presently.This paper,by reviewing a large amount of past literatures,advocates that the evaluation of regional planning is experiencing the shift from "planning outcome as blueprint" to "the process of planning decision and implementation".The paper also summaried the most popular evaluation methods and issues affecting plan implementation based on the evolution of evaluation theories,and proposed ideas for future studies. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2012,31(6):768-776 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
区域规划评估
;
评估内容
;
评估方法
;
影响因素
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所, 南京, 210008
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
建筑科学 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4570672
|
参考文献 共
51
共3页
|
|
1.
孙施文. 试析规划编制与规划实施管理的矛盾.
规划师,2001(3):5-8
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Pearman A D. Unvertainty in planning: Characterisation, evaluation, and feedback.
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,1985,12(3):313-320
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Khakee Abdul. Evaluation and planning: Inseparable concepts.
Town Planning Review,1998,69(4):359-374
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Masser I.
Evaluating Urban Planning Efforts,1983:37-45
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Lichfield N.
Evaluation in the Planning Process,1975:28-31
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Young R C. Goals and goal-setting.
Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1966,32(2):76-85
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Talen E. Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning.
Journal of Planning Literature,1996,10(3):248-261
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Whelan J. Assessing urban planning schemes by means of multi-criteria evaluation techniques: The case of pedestrianisation.
Urban Studies,1994,31(2):309-329
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Innes J E. Group processes and the social construction of growth management.
Journal of the American Planning Association,1992,58(4):440-493
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Wildavsky A. If planning isn’ t everything, maybe it's nothing.
Policy Science,1973,26:83-89
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Sabatier P A. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis.
Journal of Public Policy,1986,6(1):21-48
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
孙施文. 城市规划实施评价的理论与方法.
城市规划汇刊,2003(2):15-27
|
被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
The Mississippi Valley Committee. Conservation and planning in the early new deal.
Historian,1970,32(3):449-469
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Alexander E R. Planning and Plan Implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria.
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,1989,16(2):127-140
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Hall A C. Generation Urban Design Objective for Local Area: A methodology and case study application to Chelmsford Essx.
Town Planning Review,1990,6:279-291
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Harvey D.
The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory Capitalist Urbanization,1985:57-83
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
McAllister D.
Evaluation in environmental planning,1982:36-44
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Lichfield N. where do we go from here?.
Recent developments in evaluation,2001:91-109
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Oliveira V. Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects.
Journal of Planning Literature,2001,24(4):343-361
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Hill M. A goal-achievement matrix for evaluating alternative plans.
Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1968,34(1):19-29
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问