|
无人系统的自主性评价方法
查看参考文献76篇
文摘
|
未来不管在军事领域还是民用领域,用于陆、海、空、天的无人系统将发挥巨大作用.要实现无人系统的自主作业能力,对自主性进行评价非常关键.针对无人系统的自主性评价问题,本文首先对自主性基本概念、自主性评价的意义进行论述,然后对现有评价方法进行综述和分析,旨在基于关键技术和技术成熟度两个方面的分析,采用一种普适性的评价模型"蛛网模型"对自主性进行评价.这种模型通过确定不同类型无人系统评价模型中纬线和经线的数量/数值,可综合处理经线的互耦合、高维度、多样性等因素,对无人系统自主性评价有一定参考意义. |
来源
|
科学通报
,2012,57(15):1290-1299 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
无人系统
;
自主性
;
评价
;
等级
;
蛛网模型
|
地址
|
中国科学院沈阳自动化研究所, 机器人学国家重点实验室, 沈阳, 110016
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
综述型 |
ISSN
|
0023-074X |
学科
|
系统科学 |
基金
|
国家973计划
;
中国科学院“优秀博士学位论文、院长奖获得者科研启动专项资金”项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4534848
|
参考文献 共
76
共4页
|
1.
林聪榕.
智能化无人作战系统,2008
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
2.
蒋新松.
水下机器人,2000
|
被引
104
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Antsaklis P J. An introduction to autonomous control systems.
IEEE Contr Syst Mag,1991,11:5-13
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Research Council of the National Academies.
Technology Development for Army Unmanned Ground Vehicles,2002
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
.
ASTM F2541–06, Standard Guide for Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUV) Autonomy and Control,2006
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Huang H M. Specifying autonomy levels for unmanned systems: Interim report.
Proceedings of the 2004 SPIE Defense and Security Symposium Conference,2004:386-397
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Huang H M. A framework for autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS).
Proceedings of the AUVSI’s Unmanned System North America Conference,2005:849-863
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Huang H M. Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) framework: Safety and application issues.
Proceedings of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop,2007:48-53
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
9.
.
ASTM E2521–07, Standard Terminology for Urban Search and Rescue Robotic Operations,2007
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Roadmap 2000–2025. Technical Report. Department of Defense,2001
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Roadmap 2002–2027. Technical Report. Department of Defense,2002
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Unmanned Aircraft System Roadmap 2005–2030. Technical Report. Department of Defense,2005
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Brent A.
Mission planning system for vehicles with varying levels of autonomy. US Patent, US7765038B2,2010
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Satoshi K. Low–level autonomy of the humanoid robots H6 & H7.
Robotics Research STAR 6,2003:83-97
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Jeremi G. Embedding heterogeneous levels of decisional autonomy in multi–robot systems.
Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 6,2007:263-272
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Herve A. Goal driven planning and adaptivity for AUVs.
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Control Architectures of Robots,2006:191-197
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Broten G S. Architecture for autonomy: Implementation and usage on the raptor UGV. Technical Report.
Defence R&D Canada–Suffield,2006
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Protti M. UAV autonomy – Which level is desirable? – Which level is acceptable? Alenia aeronautica viewpoint.
Proceedings of the AVT–SCI Joint Symposium,2007:1-12
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Fil M. The test and evaluation of unmanned and autonomous systems.
Int Test Eval Assoc J,2008,29:388-395
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Suresh M. Role of information and communication in redefining unmanned aerial vehicle autonomous control levels.
P I Mech Eng G–J Aer,2010,224:171-197
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
|