特征框架效应的心理机制与影响因素
The Psychological Mechanism and Influential Factors of Attribute Framing Effect
查看参考文献55篇
|
文摘
|
特征框架效应是指当分别以积极框架和消极框架来描述给定情境中某一事物或事件的关键特征时，一般情况下人们更偏好以积极框架来描述其关键特征的事物或事件的现象。特征框架效应广泛的存在于消费、医学及政治等领域。目前，它的解释机制主要包括效价加工的认知机制、参照依赖、查询理论以及认知神经机制。它的影响因素主要包括经验、人格特质、计算能力以及认知闭合需要等。未来的研究应该从深入探索特征框架效应的产生根源和影响因素，拓展其应用研究，深入探索偏好消极框架下的特征框架效应以及探讨该现象与其它现象之间的关系等五方面展开。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Attribute framing effect refers to the phenomenon that evaluations of an object or event are more favorable if a key attribute within any given context is framed in positive rather than negative terms. Attribute framing effect widely exists in consumer judgment, medical treatments, political decision and other decision-making fields. Currently, the researchers have used cognitive mechanism of valence, reference dependence, query theory and the view of cognitive neural mechanisms to illustrate the generation mechanism of attribute framing effect. Researchers have found that experience, personality traits, numeracy, need for cognitive closure may influence the attribute framing effect. Future researches on attribute framing effect should focus on the following five aspects, such as deepening our understanding of its original roots and influential factors, expanding its applied values, exploring the situation in which decision maker prefer to the negative framing and at last clarifying the relationship between attribute framing effect and other decision phenomena. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2011,19(12):1822-1833 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
特征框架效应
;
效价加工
;
参照依赖
;
查询理论
;
认知闭合需要
|
|
地址
|
华中师范大学心理学院, 湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室, 武汉, 430079
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4402302
|
参考文献 共
55
共3页
|
|
1.
段锦云. 框架效应认知加工的脑半球定位研究.
心理科学,2010,33:8-11
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
何嘉梅. 时间贴现的性质与脑机制.
心理科学进展,2009,17:98-105
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
刘腾飞. 禀赋效应的心理机制及其影响因素.
心理科学进展,2010,18:646-654
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
刘雪峰. 认知闭合需要、框架效应与决策偏好.
心理学报,2007,39:611-618
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Bellman S. To opt-in or opt-out? It depends on the question.
Communications of the ACM,2001,44:25-27
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Bertini M. The framing effect of price format.
Working Paper, Harvard Business School,2006
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Bigman C A. Effective or ineffective: Attribute framing and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.
Patient Education and Counseling,2010,81:70-76
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Chang C T. Health-care product advertising: The influences of message framing and perceived product characteristics.
Psychology and Marketing,2007,24:143-169
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Clore G L. Affective causes and consequences of social information processing.
Hand Book of Social Cognition,1994,2:323-417
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
De Martino B. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain.
Science,2006,313:684-687
|
被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Donovan R J. Positively versus negatively framed product attributes: The influence of involvement.
Psychology and Marketing,1999,16:613-630
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Dunegan K J. Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full.
Journal of Applied Psychology,1993,78:491-503
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Dunegan K J. Feedback sign and "mindful vs. mindless" information processing.
Advances in Managerial Cognition and Organizational Information Processing,1994,5:315-316
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Dunegan K J. GPA and attribute framing effects: Are better students more sensitive or more susceptible?.
The Journal of Education for Business,2010,85:239-247
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Friedman R S. Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2005,88:263-275
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Gamliel E. Positive versus negative framing affects justice judgments.
Social Justice Research,2006,19:307-322
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Gamliel E. Attribute framing affects the perceived fairness of health care allocation principles.
Judgment and Decision Making,2010,5:11-20
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Gurmankin A D. The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication.
Medical Decision Making,2004,24:265-271
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Hannah G. Attribute and responsibility framing effects in television news coverage of poverty.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2006,36:2993-3014
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Hardisty D J. A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory.
Psychological Science,2010,21:86-92
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问