行为决策中的默认效应
Default Effect in Behavioral Decision Making
查看参考文献46篇
|
文摘
|
默认效应指的是当存在默认选项时,人们决策时倾向于保留默认选项而不做出改变的一种现象。这种现象广泛存在于器官捐献政策、退休金储蓄计划和消费决策等领域并在这些领域中有巨大的应用价值。目前,研究者主要从损失规避、质询理论、暗含的推荐和神经心理机制四个方面解释默认效应的形成机制。默认效应还受到努力成本、默认选项的框架和个人经验等因素影响。未来的研究可以从深入探讨默认效应的产生根源、加强其跨文化研究以及拓展其应用领域这三个方面来展开。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Default effect refers to a phenomenon that people tend to maintain the default and do not change the choice in decision making. Default effect widely exists in organ donations, retirement savings plans, consumer decision and other decision-making fields and has great application values in these fields. Currently, there are four ways for researchers to illustrate the formation mechanism of default effect: loss aversion, query theory, implicit recommendations and neural psychological mechanism. The factors to influence default effect include such as follows: effort, the framing of default and personal experience. Further research on default effect needs to deeply investigate our understanding of its causes, to strengthen cross-cultural research and to expand its application values. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2011,19(11):1675-1683 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
默认效应
;
损失规避
;
质询理论
;
暗含的推荐
|
|
地址
|
华中师范大学心理学院, 湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室, 武汉, 430079
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4380084
|
参考文献 共
46
共3页
|
|
1.
李纾(译).
行为与决策(第四版),2009
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
刘欢. 行为经济学中的损失规避.
心理科学进展,2009,17:788-794
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
刘腾飞. 安于现状偏差的心理机制,影响因素及应用启示.
心理科学进展,2010,18:1636-1643
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Abadie A. The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study.
Journal of Health Economics,2006,25:599-620
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Anderson M C. Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1994,20:1063-1087
|
被引
38
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Baron J. Omission bias, individual differences, and normality.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2004,94:74-85
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Bellman S. To opt-in or opt-out? It depends on the question.
Communications of the ACM,2001,44:25-27
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Beshears J. The importance of default options for retirement savings outcomes: Evidence from the United States. NBER Working Paper No.12009.
Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas,2006
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Brown C L. The skeptical shopper: A metacognitive account for the effects of default options on choice.
Journal of Consumer Research,2004,31:529-539
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Choi J J. Plan design and 401(k) savings outcomes.
Working Paper of Boettner Center for Pensions and Retirement Research,2004
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Choi J J. Optimal defaults.
American Economic Review,2003,93:180-185
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Cornforth A. Behaviour change: Insights for environmental policy making from social psychology and behavioural economics.
Policy Quarterly,2009,5:21-28
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Cronqvist H. Design choices in privatized social-security systems: Learning from the Swedish experience.
The American Economic Review,2004,94:424-428
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Dinner I.
Partitioning default effects: Why people choose not to choose,2009
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Fleming S M. Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2010,107:6005-6009
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Gallery G. Superannuation choice: The pivotal role of the default option.
Journal of Australian Political Economy,2004,53:44-66
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Goldstein D G. Nudge your customers toward better choices.
Harvard Business Review,2008,86:99-105
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Halpern S D. Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care.
New England Journal of Medicine,2007,357:1340-1344
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Johnson E J. Defaults, framing and privacy: Why opting in-opting out.
Marketing Letters,2002,13:5-15
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Johnson E J. Do defaults save lives?.
Science,2003,302:1338-1339
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问