以一般性人际关系维度构建家庭关系功能量表
Construction of Family Functioning Questionnaire by General Interpersonal Dimension
查看参考文献14篇
|
文摘
|
目的：改编适合中国文化背景的家庭关系功能量表。方法：以Shek等人编制的家庭功能量表为基础，结合 访谈结果确定量表项目。采用探索性因素分析构建量表的一般性人际关系三因子维度，用验证性因素分析检验量表 的效度并进行信度分析。结果：最终形成30个项目的家庭关系功能量表；EFA结果得到3个因子：情感性、控制性和 行动力；CFA表明三因子模型在不同评价者和不同家庭关系上拟合良好；同质信度为0.81-0.93，分半信度为0.80- 0.94。结论：改编的家庭关系功能量表具有良好的信效度符合心理测量学基本要求。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective: To develop a family relationship functioning scale in Chinese culture. Methods: Based on general interpersonal dimension and combined with the interviews, a pro-questionnaire was developed; EFA and CFA were used to test the validity of the scale. Results: 30-item questionnaire was formed; EFA indicated that there were three factors, namely: affect, control and activity, which explained 53.52% of total variance with loading between 0.40-0.81; CFA showed the 3-factor model in different evaluators and in different relationships were well fitted; Cronbach's α was 0.81- 0.93, and split-half coefficient was 0.80-0.94. Conclusion: The structure, reliability and validity of family relationship function scale meets the need of psychometrics. |
|
来源
|
中国临床心理学杂志
,2011,19(5):612-614 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
家庭功能
;
独生子女
;
信度
;
效度
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国劳动关系学院, 北京, 100048
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1005-3611 |
|
学科
|
基础医学 |
|
基金
|
本文系“中华全国总工会委托课题”部分研究成果
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4337894
|
参考文献 共
14
共1页
|
|
1.
Schwab J J.
Family functioning-the general living systems research model,2000:19-20
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Beavers W R. The beavers systems model of family functioning.
Journal of Family Therapy,2000,22(2):128-143
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Olson D H.
FACES III,1985
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Shek. Family functioning and psychological well being, school adjustment, and problem behavior in Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage.
Genetic Psychol,2002,163(4):497-500
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Miller I W. The McMaster App roach to Families: theory, assessment, treatment and research.
J Fam Ther,2000,22:168-189
|
被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Skinner H. Family assessment measure and process model of family functioning.
Journal of Family Therapy,2000,22(2):190-210
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Walsh F.
Normal family processes,2003:514-547
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Ohannessian C M. Adolescent-parent discrepancies in perceptions of family functioning and early adolescent self-competence.
International Journal of Behavioral Development,2000,24(3):362-372
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Cole D A. Relation of family subsystems to adolescent depression: Implementing a new family assessment strategy.
Journal of Family Psychology,1993,7:119-133
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Gondoli D. Factor structure within and across three family assessment procedures.
Journal of Family Psychology,1993,6:278-289
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Michael J. Family assessment: Instrument dimensionality and correspondence across family reporters.
Journal of Family Psychology,1999,13(3):339-354
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
William L. Cook, the SRM approach to family assessment.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,2005,21(4):216-225
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Benjamin L S. Introduction to the special section on structural analysis of social behavior.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,1996,64:1203-1212
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Hayden L C. Levels of family assessment: I. Family, marital, and parent-child interaction.
Journal of Family Psychology,1998,12:7-22
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问