帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

小江流域滑坡对土地利用的敏感性
Sensitivity of landslide to land use in Xiaojiang River Basin

查看参考文献26篇

谢贤健 1   韦方强 2   兰代萍 3  
文摘 土地利用是人类活动与自然交叉最紧密的领域,不合理的土地利用方式对滑坡和泥石流等山地灾害具有明显的促进作用.选择小江流域为研究区,通过定量分析不同立地类型组中土地利用方式对滑坡的敏感性,发现易致灾的土地利用方式有:高海拔立地类型组中的旱地,密林地,疏林地,中盖度的草地,未利用地,中海拔立地类型组中的旱地,工矿交通用地,未利用地,中盖度的草地,低海拔立地类型组中的疏林地,高/中盖度草地,未利用地,它们的敏感性值均等于或大于0.5,易导致滑坡灾害的发生.并以敏感性值为依据进行了敏感性分区,可为流域土地利用方式选取,水土保持工程布局和山地灾害生物工程治理提供参考
其他语种文摘 Land-use is recognized as an important factor influencing the occurrence of landslides. But different land-use types exert different influences on landslides occurrence. In this paper, the influences of lands-use types on landslides were estimated by analyzing the sensitivities of landslides to different land-use types in different site types under the support of GIS and RS. Xiaojiang River Basin,a basin with serious landslides and debris flows disasters in Yunnan Province, China, was selected as the case study region. According to the estimated result, the sensitive values of landslide of some land-use types in Xiaojinang River Basin are high. They include dry land, dense-forest land, sparse woodland, middle-cover grassland and bare land in the high-elevation site-type group;dry land, Mine, road, and railway construction land, bare land and middle-cover grassland in the middle-elevation site-type group, sparse woodland, high-cover grassland, low-cover grassland and bare land in the low-elevation site-type group. Based on the result of sensitivity analysis, the sensitivity zoning of landslides to land-uses was carried out. This sensitivity zoning could be helpful to land-use planning, soil and water conversation planning and bioengineering of landslides and debris flows prevention
来源 自然灾害学报 ,2011,20(1):115-123 【核心库】
关键词 土地利用 ; 立地类型组 ; 滑坡 ; 敏感性
地址

1. 内江师范学院资源与环境科学学院, 四川, 内江, 641000  

2. 中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室, 四川, 成都, 610041  

3. 内江师范学院后勤基建处, 四川, 内江, 641000

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1004-4574
学科 社会科学总论;测绘学;地质学
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:4155902

参考文献 共 26 共2页

1.  Heckerman A. Probabilistic interpretation of MYCIN s certainty factors. Uncertainty in artificial intelligence,1986:298-311 被引 7    
2.  Uromeihy A. Landslide hazard zonation of the Khorshrostam area, Iran. Bull. Eng. Geo. Environ,2000,58:207-213 被引 17    
3.  兰恒星. 基于GIS的云南小江流域滑波因子敏感性分析. 岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(10):1500-1506 被引 78    
4.  He Y P. GIS - based hazard mapping and zonation of debris flow in Xiaojiang Basin, south - western China. Environmental Geology,2003,45(2):286-293 被引 11    
5.  Ma Ze-zhong. Gis - based mapping and zonation of landslide hazards in Xiaojiang Valley of Southwestern China. Wuhan University of Natural Sciences,2003,8(3b):1021-1028 被引 4    
6.  Rautela P. Landslide risk analysis between Giri and Tons Rivers in Himachal Himalaya (India). JAG,2000,2(3/4):153-160 被引 2    
7.  Griggs G B. California's coastal hazards a critical assessment of existing land - use policies and practices,1992:224 被引 1    
8.  Montgomery D R. A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resources Research,1994,30(4):1153-1171 被引 87    
9.  Hutchinson J N. Keynote paper: landslide hazard assessment. Landslides,1995:1805-1841 被引 1    
10.  Guzzetti F. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a mufti -scale study, Central Italy. Geomorpyology,1999,31:181-216 被引 143    
11.  Gritzner M L. Assessing landslide potential using GIS, soil wetness modeling and topographic attributes, Payette River, Idaho. Geomorphology,2001,37:149-165 被引 11    
12.  Cruden D M. Landslide RiskAssessment, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Landslide Risk Assessment. Honolulu, February 19-21 1997. Balkema, Rotterdam:371 被引 1    
13.  Chuster R L. Socioeconomic significance of landslides. Landslides, Investigation and Mitigation, Transportation Research Board Special Report 247,1995:12-35 被引 1    
14.  Brunsden D. Some geomorphological considerations for the future development of landslide models. Geomorphology,1999,30:13-24 被引 3    
15.  Carrara A. Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards, Klumer Academic Publisher, Boston, U. S. A. 20 Carrara; A. F. Guzzetti, M. Cardinali, and P. Reichenbach, 1999. Use of GIS technology in the prediction and monitoring of landslide hazard. Natural Hazards,1995,20:117-135 被引 1    
16.  Clerici A. A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation by the conditional analysis method. Geomorphology,2002,48:349-364 被引 21    
17.  杜榕桓. 云南小江流域泥石流综合考察与防治规划研究,1987 被引 2    
18.  陈循谦. 云南小江流域的泥石流灾害. 灾害学,1990,5(2):53-57 被引 10    
19.  兰恒星. 基于GIS的滑坡空间数据库研究——以云南小江流域为例. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2002,13(4):10-16 被引 8    
20.  中科院成都山地所. 小江流域滑坡编目,2002 被引 1    
引证文献 3

1 巩杰 基于地形梯度的景观生态风险空间分析--以甘肃省白龙江流域为例 兰州大学学报. 自然科学版,2014,50(5):692-698
被引 19

2 刘艳芳 基于确定性系数分析方法的秭归县滑坡易发性评价 自然灾害学报,2014,23(6):209-217
被引 9

显示所有3篇文献

论文科学数据集

1. 三江流域堵江滑坡灾害数据库(2018-2021)

2. 基于最优组合策略的区域滑坡敏感性分析系统源代码

3. 青藏高原农牧区生境质量1km网格数据集(1990-2015)

数据来源:
国家青藏高原科学数据中心
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号