遂渝铁路边坡草本植物多样性季节动态和空间分布特征
Seasonal dynamics and spatial distribution of herbage diversity on the slopes of Suiyu railway
查看参考文献33篇
|
文摘
|
以遂渝铁路边坡植物群落为研究对象,自然边坡为对照,分别于2008年9月,12月,2009年3月和6月对其进行植物调查.采用Margalef指数,Simpson指数,Shannon-Wiener指数和Pielou指数等指标评价不同季节,坡位和植被类型条件下草本植物多样性的变化.结果表明:在时间尺度上,铁路边坡坡中物种丰富度呈现明显的季节性差异(P<0.05),以秋季最大为2.376;铁路边坡各坡位草本植物多样性和均匀度指数也呈现显著季节性变化(P<0.05),且变化规律一致:春季>夏季>冬季>秋季;与铁路边坡不同,自然边坡草本植物丰富度,多样性和均匀度指数变化趋势不明显(P>0.05).在空间分布上,坡位对铁路边坡物种丰富度影响显著(P<0.05),其中,夏季坡上植物丰富度最大为2.164,春季,秋季和冬季丰富度最大值均在坡中最大,分别为2.261,2.376和1.983;坡位仅对自然边坡秋季物种丰富度和均匀度影响显著(P<0.05),其中,物种丰富度表现为坡上>坡下>坡中,而均匀度为坡中>坡上>坡下.不同植被类型的物种丰富度,多样性和均匀度也有较大差异,自然边坡物种多样性明显大于铁路边坡,总体上自然边坡植被恢复优于铁路边坡.因此,加强对植被恢复的管理是铁路边坡生态恢复的重要环节 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Seasonal dynamics and spatial distribution of herbage diversity were studied in the vegetation on the slopes of Suiyu railway as compared with the natural slopes.Herbaceous community was investigated in four seasons including March(spring),June(summer),September(autumn) and December(winter) from 2008 to 2009,respectively.The Margalef index,Simpson index,Shannon-Wiener index and Pielou index were analyzed.The results indicated that,the species richness existed prominent difference in the middle slope on the slopes of Suiyu railway(P<0.05),the maximum species richness reached 2.376 in autumn.Both species diversity and evenness index had significant difference among different seasons in different location of the slope(P<0.05),and the changing of species diversity and evenness index had the same rules with the following order: spring > summer > winter > autumn,while the seasonal changes of species richness,diversity and evenness indices were not obvious on the natural slope.The location of the railway slope affected the species richness prominently(P<0.05) rather than diversity and evenness(P>0.05),the species richness reached its maximum of 2.164 in summer on the upper slop,2.261,2.376 and 1.983 in spring,autumn and winter on the middle slop respectively.The location of the natural slope only affected the species richness and evenness in autumn significantly(P<0.05),moreover,they had different kinds of changing rules.The species richness followed the order as of upper > lower > middle,whereas,the evenness followed the order as of middle > upper > lower.There existed larger differences in the aspect of the species richness,diversity and evenness among different vegetation types.The species richness on the natural slope was significantly larger than that on the railway slope,and the vegetation restoration on the natural slope was better than that on the slope of railway.So strengthen the management is key measurement to ecological restoration of railway slope |
|
来源
|
生态学报
,2010,30(24):6892-6900 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
铁路边坡
;
植被恢复
;
草本植物多样性
;
季节动态
;
空间分布
|
|
地址
|
1.
四川大学生命科学学院, 生物资源与生态环境教育部重点实验室, 成都, 610064
2.
中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都, 610041
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0933 |
|
学科
|
植物学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金资助项目
;
四川省科技支撑计划项目
;
四川省公益性研究项目
;
中国科学院西部之光人才培养计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4102711
|
参考文献 共
33
共2页
|
|
1.
卓慕宁. 高速公路生态护坡技术的水土保持效应研究.
水土保持学报,2006,20(1):164-167
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
袁剑刚. 采石场悬崖生态系统自然演替初期土壤和植被特征.
生态学报,2005,25(6):1517-1522
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
潘树林. 论边坡的生态恢复.
生态学杂志,2005,24(2):217-221
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Gao G J. Characteristics of the combination of synthetic soils by plant and soil properties used for rock slope restoration.
Ecological Engineering,2007,30:303-311
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
刘春霞. 高速公路边坡植被恢复研究进展.
生态学报,2007,27(5):2090-2098
|
被引
61
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
李绍才. 中国岩石边坡植被护坡技术现状及发展趋势.
资源科学,2004,26(Supp):61-66
|
被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
章梦涛. 客土喷播在边坡生态修复与防护中的应用.
中国水土保持科学,2004,2(3):10-12
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
漆良华. 退化土地植被恢复群落物种多样性与生物量分配格局.
生态学杂志,2007,26(11):1697-1702
|
被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
温远光. 大明山中山植被恢复过程植物物种多样性的变化.
植物生态学报,1998,22(1):33-40
|
被引
57
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
赵警卫. 七种生态护坡在高速公路边坡的应用效果.
公路,2006,1:201-204
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
杨晓亮. 两种有机添加物对岩石边坡植被恢复人工土壤抗蚀性的影响.
水土保持学报,2009,23(1):21-25
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
冉雪梅. 遂渝铁路边坡种植基材配比对植被的影响.
路基工程,2006,6:117-118
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Sagar R. Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in a dry tropical forest region of India.
Forest Ecology and Management,2003,186:61-71
|
被引
41
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Nagaraja B C. Tree species diversity and composition in logged and unlogged rainforest of Kudremukh National Park, South India.
Journal of Environmental Biology,2005,26:627-634
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Tilman D. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands.
Nature,1994,367:363-365
|
被引
291
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Ruiz-JaOn M C. Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success.
Forest Ecology and Management,2005,218:159-173
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Verma R K. Analysis of plant diversity in degraded and plantation forests in Kunihar Forest Division of Himachal Pradesh.
Indian Journal of Forestry,2005,28:11-16
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
杨修. 德兴铜矿矿山废弃地植被恢复与重建研究.
生态学报,2001,21(11):1932-1940
|
被引
82
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
邵新庆. 典型草原自然恢复演替过程中植物群落动态变化.
生态学报,2008,28(2):855-861
|
被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
王绪高. 长白山阔叶红松林物种多度和空间分布格局的关系.
生态学杂志,2008,27(2):145-150
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问