人格特质与主观幸福感:情绪调节的中介作用
Personality Traits and Subjective Well-being: the Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation
查看参考文献16篇
文摘
|
通过对1163名大学生被试进行人格特质、情绪调节策略的使用以及主观幸福感的测查,本研究探讨了气质性人格特质(神经质和外倾性)这种稳定的内在心理结构对主观幸福感产生影响的可能机制.结果发现:(1)除直接影响个体的主观幸福感外,神经质和外倾性还会通过重新评价策略的使用间接影响主观幸福感;(2)人格特质和重新评价策略的使用可以有效预测个体主观幸福感的变异;(3)习惯性地使用表达抑制策略对个体的主观幸福感并没有显著的影响.这些结果表明重新评价策略的使用在人格特质对主观幸福感的影响中具有重要的中介作用.该发现对进一步制定改善和提高个体的主观幸福感的干预措施具有重要的启示和指导意义. |
其他语种文摘
|
A .series of psychological tests including the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Short Scale for China, Emotiori Regulation Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule were administered to 1163 college students. After analyzing the testing results, we obtained the following findings: (1) besides direct influences, neuroticism and extraversion also contributed to SWB through reappraisal strategy; (2) both personality traits and reappraisal strategy were significant factors in predicting SWB; (3) the chronic use of suppression strategy did not have significant influences on individuals' SWB. These findings suggest that reappraisal is an important and effective regulation strategy, and has significant implication for an individual' s SWB. Especially, because reappraisal is a skill that can be acquired through learning, individuals can use the skill flexibly and effectively under the direction of experts to improve their SWB, and maintain and prompt their psychological health. |
来源
|
心理科学
,2010,33(1):165-167 【扩展库】
|
关键词
|
主观幸福感
;
人格特质
;
情绪调节
;
重新评价
;
表达抑制
|
地址
|
1.
南京大学社会学院心理系, 江苏, 南京, 210093
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
3.
北京师范大学心理学院, 北京, 100875
4.
中共上海市委党校, 上海, 200233
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3849926
|
参考文献 共
16
共1页
|
1.
Diener E. Subjective well-being:The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index.
American Psychologists,2000,55(1):34-43
|
被引
68
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Diener E. Personality,culture,and subjective well-being:Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life.
Annual Review of Psychology,2003,54:403-425
|
被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Rusting C L. Personality,mood,and cognitive processing of emotional information:three conceptual frameworks.
Psychological Bulletin,1998,124(2):165-196
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Gross J J. The emerging field of emotion regulation:an integrative review.
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY,1998,2(3):271-299
|
被引
97
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Gross J J. Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation:divergent consequences for experience,expression,and physiology.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74(1):224-237
|
被引
101
次
|
|
|
|
6.
黄敏儿. 原因调节与反应调节的情绪变化过程.
心理学报,2002,34(4):371-380
|
被引
34
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Gross J J. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes:implications for affect,relationships,and well-being.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003,85(2):348-362
|
被引
153
次
|
|
|
|
8.
钱铭怡. 艾森克人格问卷简式量表中国版(EPQ-RSC)的修订.
心理学报,2000,32(3):317-323
|
被引
183
次
|
|
|
|
9.
王力.
成人情绪调节对个体主观幸福感的意义[博士论文],2006
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Diener E. The satisfaction with life scale.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT,1985,49(1):71-75
|
被引
167
次
|
|
|
|
11.
王力. PANAS—X总维度量表在中国人群中的因素结构.
中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(6):565-568
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Shrout P E. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies;New procedures and recommendations.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS,2002,7(3):422-445
|
被引
51
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Gross J J. Emotion regulation;past,present,future.
Cognition and Emotion,1999,13(5):551-573
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
14.
John O P. Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation:personality processes,individual differences,and life span development.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY,2004,72(6):1301-1333
|
被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Mesquita C B. Cultural variation in emotions;A review.
Psychological Bulletin,1992,112(2):179-204
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Butler,E A. Emotion Regulation and Culture; Are the Social Consequences of Emotion Suppression Culture-Specific?.
EMOTION,2007,7(1):30-48
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|