流调中心抑郁量表全国城市常模的建立
Development of the Chinese age norms of CES-D in urban area
查看参考文献12篇
|
文摘
|
目的:验证流调中心抑郁量表(The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale,CES-D)在我国城市人群中不同年龄组的适用性,并建立各年龄组常模.方法:采用横断面研究方法,在全国21省39座城市收集普通人群样本16047名[年龄11～100岁,平均(37.7±21.3)岁]以建立常模,在4个城市的精神科门诊与住院病人中选取病人样本349名[年龄16～81岁,平均(32.0±12.1)岁]以检验效标效度.从普通人群样本中抽取北京、东莞、包头的199名企业职工、100名大学生、30名教师进行了间隔8周的重测,以检验重测信度.结果:CES-D的Cronbsch仅系数为0.90,各因素的Cronbach α系数为0.68～0.86;间隔8周的重测信度为0.49(P<0.01),各因素重测相关为0.39～0.51(P<0.01);验证性因素分析支持原量表4因素的结构(RMSEA=0.057,CFI=0.976,GFI=0.948);心理疾病患者CES-D得分高于普通人群[(21.72±13.39)vs.(13.24±10.33),P<0.01)],其中抑郁患者得分最高[(27.82±14.42),P<0.01];不同年龄组CES-D得分差异有统计学意义,60岁以上组得分高于60岁以下各组(P<0.01).结论:中文版流调中心抑郁量表适用于我国不同年龄群体,是一个可靠而有效的自评式抑郁症状测量工具. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective: To test applicability of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in different age groups in urban China, and to develop age norms. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the CES-D was administrated to 16047 community participants with average age of (37.7±21.3) years (age ranged 11～100) in 21 provinces, who were as the norming sample. Criterion validity was tested in 349 psychiatric patients with average age of (32.0±12.1) years (age ranged 16～81) in 4 cities. A subsample (199 workers, 100 col-lege students, and 30 teachers in Beijing, Dongguan, and Baotou) was drawn from the national sample to provide 8 week interval test-retest reliability. Results: The Cronbach α was 0.90 for the scale, and 0.68～0.86 for its fac-tors. The 8 week interval test-retest correlation was 0.49 for the scale (P <0.01) and 0.39～0.51 for factors (P<0.01) . The result of confirmatory factor analysis supported the original 4-factor structure (RMSEA=0.057, CFI =0.976, GFI=0.948) . Patients scored higher than community sample [(21.72±13.39 ) vs.(13.24±10.33),P <0.01], and depression patients scored the highest [(27.82±14.42), P<0.01] . Age difference was signifi-cant. Age groups over 60-year-old scored higher than all the other age groups under 60-year-old (P<0.01). Con-clusion: The Chinese version of CES-D shows good refiability and validity across all ages in urban population- |
|
来源
|
中国心理卫生杂志
,2010,24(2):139-143 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
心理测量
;
普通人群
;
心理疾病患者
;
抑郁
;
全国常模城市
;
流调中心抑郁量表
;
横断面研究
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-6729 |
|
学科
|
预防医学、卫生学;神经病学与精神病学 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院心理研究所青年科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3813756
|
参考文献 共
12
共1页
|
|
1.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale:A self-report depression scale for research in the general population.
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT,1977,1:385-401
|
被引
210
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
石岩. CES-D量表对运动员抑郁症状的测查.
中国心理卫生杂志,1994,8(2):56-58
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
刘贤臣. SDS和CES-D对大学生抑郁症状评定结果的比较.
中国心理卫生杂志,1995,9(1):19-21
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
阳德华. 初中生的抑郁与焦虑:结构与发展特点.
心理发展与教育,2000,3:12-17
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
高茗. 青少年抑郁、焦虑症状及相关因素的研究.
安徽预防医学杂志,2001,7(4):250-251
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
刘宏军. 北京市老年人抑郁症状的调查.
中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(11):794-795
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
刘平(译).
ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类:研究用标准,1995:79-82
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Radloff LS. The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Stud-ies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults.
JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE,1991,20(2):149-166
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
杨宜音(译).
性格与社会心理测量总览,1997:157-212
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
刘平. 流调中心用抑郁量表(Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale,CES-D).
中国心理卫生杂志,1999(增刊):200-202
|
被引
51
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Andresen EM. Screeni-ng for depression in well older adults:evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies De-pression Scale).
Am J Prevent Med,1994,10:77-84
|
被引
71
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
DeForge BR. Self-report depression scales in the elderly:the relationship between the CES-D and the Zong.
International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine,1988,18:325-328
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问