乡村景观遗产地保护性旅游开发模式研究——以浙江龙门古镇为例
Protective-oriented Tourism Development Mode of Rural Heritage Site——A Case Study of Longmen Ancient Town,Zhejiang
查看参考文献16篇
文摘
|
近年来,伴随旅游市场生态、文化诉求的日益增强,世界范围内乡村景观遗产旅游备受青睐.中国广袤的地理环境空间中拥有丰富多彩的乡村景观遗产资源,正在成为推动现阶段特色化乡村旅游业发展的重要力量.然而,快速发展的旅游产业也引发了遗产地过度商业化、超负荷接待等问题,威胁到遗产保护和可持续利用.以浙江龙门古镇为例,在借鉴传统开发模式相关经验的基础上,构建了一种保护性旅游开发模式,以实现保护前提下乡村景观遗产资源的合理开发和有效利用. |
其他语种文摘
|
With increasing demand for ecological and cultural tourism in recent years,rural heritage tourism becomes more and more popular worldwide.As the representation of local culture,folk custom and architectural art reflecting the evolvement of historical culture and social development,it is of great significance to be protected and made good use of the rural heritage.In China.the,vast geographical land has nurtured colorful rural herit-age,which promoted cultural tourism development greatly.However,with the rapid development of tourism, problems such as over-commercialization and tourism urbanization occurred which threatened the protection and sustainable development of the rural heritage resources.On the one hand,urbanization and rural modernization have a great impact on traditional landscape and make the cultural identification gradually lose.Furthermore,the traditional mode of tourism development is resources-oriented,which focuses on the protection of core area or primary buildings especially.So the protected area becomes more and more limited while the core area shrinks and traditional landscapes are changed.This "centralized" mode brings many conflicts between rural heritage's protection and tourism development.In view of these problems,it is necessary to develop a new way for managing the local cultural resources in tourism.Taking Longmen ancient town for an example,this article discussed the effective way to protect and further exploit rural heritage resources aiming for sustainable tourism development:First,to identify the culture features and the extent of ancient villages and towns,based on which a cultural landscape zoning approach can be applied.Second,to define a cooperative function area to relax the pressure on core areas and to protect their authentic cultures by extending tourism space.In addition,to balance the tourism development with traditional industries to enhance the sustainability of community economies, |
来源
|
地理科学
,2009,29(6):840-845 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
乡村景观遗产
;
旅游
;
保护
;
开发模式
;
古镇
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
2.
澳门科技大学,国际旅游学院, 澳门
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3792972
|
参考文献 共
16
共1页
|
1.
Prideaux B. Tourism and heritage are not strangers:A study of opportunities for rural heritage museums to maximize tourism visitation.
Journal of Travel Reseavch,1999,37(3):299-304
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Fisher D G. The Potential for Rural Heritage Tourism in the Clarence Valley of Northern New South Wales.
AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER,2006,37(3):411-424
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
3.
吴必虎. 中国城市周边乡村旅游地空间结构.
地理科学,2004,24(6):757-764
|
被引
43
次
|
|
|
|
4.
王云才.
乡村景观旅游规划设计的理论与实践,2004:106-111
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
黄芳. 传统民居旅游开发中居民参与问题思考.
旅游学刊,2002,17(5):54-57
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
6.
杨载田. 南岭山区传统聚落景观资源及其旅游开发研究.
长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(1):35-39
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
7.
吴承照. 古村落可持续发展的文化生态策略——以高迁古村落为例.
城市规划汇刊,2003(4):56-61
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
8.
朱桃杏. 徽州古村落群旅游差异性开发的竞合分?.
人文地理,2006,21(6):57-61
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
9.
杨效忠. 古村落社区旅游参与度及影响因素——西递、宏村、南屏比较研究.
地理科学,2008,2s(3):445-451
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
10.
马晓京. 民族旅游保护性开发的新思路.
贵州民族研究,2002,22(5):23-28
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
11.
杨振之. 前台、帷幕、后台--民族文化保护与旅游开发的新模式探索.
民族研究,2006(2):39-46
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
12.
保继刚. 历史城镇的旅游商业化研究.
地理学报,2004,59(3):427-436
|
被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Mullins P. Tourism Urbanization.
International Journal of Urban and Pagional Research,1991,15(3):326-342
|
被引
54
次
|
|
|
|
14.
王云才. 江南水乡区域景观体系特征与整体保护机制.
长江流域资源与环境,2006,15(6):709-712
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
王云才. 北京西部山区传统村落保护与旅游开发利用——以门头沟区为例.
山地学报,2006,24(4):466-472
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
16.
阮仪三. 寻求遗产保护和旅游发展的"双赢"之路.
城市规划,2003,27(6):85-90
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|