帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

迫选规则体验法:检验规范性和描述性风险决策理论的新尝试
The Experiencing of Imposed Rule: A New Attempt to Test Both Normative and Descriptive Decision Theories

查看参考文献31篇

文摘 为寻求检验规范性和描述性风险决策理论的通用标准,本研究以期望价值理论和齐当别抉择模型为例,探讨了"迫选规则体验法"的适用性.被试为120名大学生,实验任务为要求被试分别完成自主决策(采用未知规则:真规则)和规则迫选决策(遵循给定规则:假规则)任务,并对决策后的情感和认可程度进行评定.研究发现:(1)被试在自主决策条件下比在规则迫选条件下体验到的正性情感程度更强,负性情感的程度更弱;(2)被试在自主决策与规则迫选决策两种条件下做出的相同决策越多,该被试对迫选规则更加认可并体验到的正性情感程度越强,负性情感的程度越弱;(3)与期望价值理论相比,齐当别抉择模型可能符合更多决策者的实际决策规则.这些结果表明,作为检验规范性和捕述性风险决策理论的新尝试,迫选规则体验法可能更有助于同答"决策者实际采用的决策规则是什么"的问题.
其他语种文摘 In the field of decision theory, the tension between normative and descriptive theories has been a constant object of debate. The criterions used to evaluate normative and descriptive theories, however, differ from each other. This study sought a consistent criterion to evaluate both normative and descriptive decision theories and thus to explore the "true" rule of decision making. We hypothesized that (1) individuals would experience more positive emotions and show more acceptance when making decision according to their own rule ("true" rule) than according to a pseudo-rule; (2) the greater number of the same decision derived from decision makers' own rule ("true" rule) and the imposed rule, the more positive emotions and acceptance would be reported.To test these hypotheses, the expected value theory (normative theory) and the equate-to-differentiate theory (descriptive theory) were selected as two candidates of imposed rule. One hundred and twenty college students were asked to make risky choices according to their own rule (self-rule condition) and according to the two imposed rules (imposed rule condition), expected value rule and equate-to-differentiate rule, respectively. In the self-rule condition, participants rated their emotions after making choices according to their own rule. In the imposed rule condition, participants rated their emotions and acceptances of the two imposed rules after making choice according to the imposed rules. The order of the two imposed rules was counterbalanced across participants. We used the McNemar test to compare the decisions made under the self-rule condition and the imposed rule condition, and repeated measured ANOVAs to test the differences on emotion and acceptance ratings between the self-rule and the imposed rule conditions. The results revealed that (1) participants reported more positive emotion when making choices according to their own rules than to imposed rules; (2) the greater number of the same decisions derived from the imposed and "true" rules, the more acceptance and positive emotion reported by the participants; (3) equate-to-differentiate rule is more likely to be consistent with decision makers' true rule than expected value rule. These findings supported our hypotheses.As a new attempt to test normative and descriptive theories, the experiencing of imposed rule would possibly help us to better understand what the decision makers' true rule is. Considering that expectation rule is deemed as the soul of the dominant normative theories of decision-making under risk, our findings suggested that normative theories might fail to capture the nature of individuals' risky choice. In contrast, descriptive theories (e.g., the equate-to-differentiate theory) seem to provide a better explanation to understand the actual mechanism of decision making under risk.
来源 心理学报 ,2009,41(8):726-736 【核心库】
关键词 迫选规则体验法 ; 规范性理论 ; 描述性理论 ; 期望价值理论 ; 齐当别抉择模型
地址

中国科学院心理研究所社会与经济行为研究中心, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 中国科学院“百人计划”项目 ;  中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目 ;  国家自然科学基金 ;  2007年度中国科学院研究生科学与社会实践资助专项创新研究类项目 ;  北京市教委共建项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:3664862

参考文献 共 31 共2页

1.  Allais,M. Le comportement de l'homme rationel devant le risque:Critique des postulats et axioms de l'ecole americaine[Rational man's behavior in face of risk:Critique of the American School's postulates and axioms]. ECONOMETRICA,1953,21:503-546 被引 37 次    
2.  Baillargeon,R. The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy:a summary in eight lessons. Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development,2002:47-83 被引 2 次    
3.  Baron,J. Thinking and deciding(Fourth ed),2008 被引 1 次    
4.  Bernoulli,D. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Comentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperiales Petropolitanae,1738,5:175-192 被引 2 次    
5.  Birnbaum,M.H. Three new tests of independence that differentiate models of risky decision making. Management Science,2005,51:1346-1358 被引 10 次    
6.  Birnbaum,M.H. Testing descriptive utility theories:Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY,1998,17:49-78 被引 2 次    
7.  Brandstatter,E. The priority heuristic:Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review,2006,113(2):409-432 被引 21 次    
8.  Camerer,C.E. An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY,1989,2:61-104 被引 1 次    
9.  Edwards,W. The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin,1954,51:380-417 被引 16 次    
10.  Edwards,W. Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. Psychological Review,1962,69:109-135 被引 6 次    
11.  Gigerenzer,G. Reasoning the fast and frugal way:Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review,1996,103:650-669 被引 14 次    
12.  Kahneman,D. Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk. ECONOMETRICA,1979,47:263-291 被引 1130 次    
13.  Levy,H. Experimental test of the prospect theory value function:A stochastic dominance approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2002,89:1058-1081 被引 5 次    
14.  Levy,H. Prospect theory:Much ado about nothing?. Management Science,2002,48(10):1334-1349 被引 9 次    
15.  Li,S. Equate-to-differentiate theory:A coherent bi-choice model across certainty,uncertainty and risk.Unpublished doctoral dissertation,1994 被引 1 次    
16.  Li,S. What is the role of transparency in cancellation?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1994,60:353-366 被引 6 次    
17.  Li,S. An additional violation of transitivity and independence between alternatives. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY,1996,17:645-650 被引 4 次    
18.  Li,S. Violations of conjoint independence in binary choice:The equate-to-differentiate interpretation. European Journal of Operational Research,2003,148:65-79 被引 10 次    
19.  Li,S. A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters. APPLIED INTELLIGENCE,2004,20(2):147-163 被引 32 次    
20.  李纾. 再探框架对风险决策行为的影响. 心理学报,2000,32(2):229-234 被引 25 次    
引证文献 9 篇

1 汪祚军 整合模型还是占优启发式模型? 从齐当别模型视角进行的检验 心理学报,2010,42(8):821-833
被引 9 次

2 梁竹苑 “20%的概率获得蛋糕”=“获得蛋糕的20%”?检验风险决策的期望法则假设 科学通报,2012,57(35):3421-3433
被引 5 次

显示所有9篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

iAuthor 链接
李纾 0000-0003-4402-1674
版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号