帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

纵向再探学前儿童心理理论发展模式
Longitudinal Perspectives: The Sequences of Theory-of-Mind Development in Chinese Preschoolers

查看参考文献35篇

方富熹 1 *   Henry M. Wellman 2   刘玉娟 1   刘国雄 1   亢蓉 1  
文摘 本文作者前不久完成的一项横断设计研究中,以自编的心理理论量表测查比较了中美两国3~5岁儿童的有关发展.量表包括五项任务:(1)不同的愿望;(2)知与不知;(3)不同的信念;(4)内容错误信念和(5)伪装的情绪.研究发现两种不同文化群体儿童对上述任务的理解均表现出稳定一致的发展次序,两者的次序大致相同但具有重要差别:我国儿童的理解次序如从易到难排列如上所列,这一次序与美国儿童的差别在于我国儿童先理解"知与不知",然后是"不同的信念",而美国儿童则恰好相反.这一研究结果对了解不同文化儿童心理理论的发展次序是十分有意义的,但问题是经南横断设计的量表研究所确立的发展次序能否准确地描述个体儿童的纵向进展呢?为此本研究使用了相同的测量工具对参加过横断研究的北京3岁儿童(时间1)在他们4岁(时间2)和5岁(时间3)时进行了焦点追踪研究.研究结果表明,随着测查时间的延伸,个体儿童的作业成绩不仅逐步提高,而且这种提高符合量表任务的发展次序.通过应用格特曼(Guttman)和雷氏(Rasch)测量模型对这一结果的分析,再一次证实我国个体儿童的有关发展次序与欧美文化儿童的发展次序大致相同并且有重要的差别.本研究的结果不仅能为横断研究中个别差异的研究提供有用的工具,而且深化了人们对心理理论发展机制的认识,即把心理理论的发展看作是在一定的文化环境影响下不断扩展和深化的概念建构过程.但对这一推论仍有待进一步证实.
其他语种文摘 Theory-of-mind (ToM) refers to people's consistent interpretation of each other's actions in terms of underlying mental states (beliefs, desires and emotions). Children come to do this in the preschool years (Harris, 2006; Wellman, 2002). In earlier research a ToM Scale was established to examine sequences of ToM understanding in children raised in U.S (Wellman & Liu, 2004) and China (Wellman, et al., 2006). The scale encompasses tasks assessing preschooler's understanding of (1) diverse desires (DD), (2) diverse beliefs (DB), (3) knowledge-access (KA), (4) false belief (FB), and (5) hidden emotion (HE). The five tasks were comparable in procedure, language and format as well as comparable across the English and Chinese versions. These two groups cross-sectionally evidenced two consistent, similar but crucially differing sequences of understanding: The item-order (from easy to hardest) for US children is that listed above, but for Chinese children the sequence was DD> KA > DB > FB > HE. That is, the order of DB and KA was reversed across these groups. Such findings are valuable for establishing developmental sequences in children raised in different cultures, and seemingly provide a cross-sectional shortcut to tracking longitudinal sequences. However, it remains an open question whether the sequences established cross-sectionally via the scale accurately depicted the longitudinal progressions that individual children undergo. We addressed that question by examining whether cross-sectional progressions and longitudinal progressions converged in Chinese preschoolers. 31 Chinese preschoolers from Beijing who had received the scale as 3-year-olds were retested again as 4-year-olds and 25 of them were retested a third time as 5-year-olds. Each child received the 5-item scale at each testing. As is standard for this scale tasks all used toy figurine and picture props to show objects and situations. All tasks included a focal test question and a control question. Children were required to pass both questions in order to count as passing a task. The data showed that the same 5-step sequence established in cross-sectional scaling analyses also characterized the longitudinal progression in Chinese children. These progressions were confirmed with Guttman and Rasch scale analyses. More specifically the scores of great majority of children increased longitudinally and decreases were rare. Thus a repeated measure ANOVA yielded a significant main effect for testing times (ages). Closer examination of children's individual longitudinal progressions confirmed that children's scores not only increased, they generally increased in sequence along the scale. In conclusion, the ToM Scale (in Chinese version) validly provides a useful method for approximating longitudinal progressions via a cross-sectional approach. It also confirms consistent sequential conceptual understanding in Chinese individual children which is largely were similar to but also crucially different from that of children from Anglo-European cultures. We discuss these sequential differences of ToM development between Chinese and US children in terms of the social interactive experiences and culturally shaped information that critically influence theory-of-mind understanding, coupled with an analysis of the contrasting language and familial systems that characterized children's early childhood experiences.
来源 心理学报 ,2009,41(8):706-714 【核心库】
关键词 心理理论量表 ; 纵向研究 ; 发展次序 ; 学前儿童
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101  

2. 美国密执安大学人类发育发展中心, 481090406

语种 中文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:3664860

参考文献 共 35 共2页

1.  Astington,J.W. A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology,1999,35:1311-1320 被引 14    
2.  Bartsch,K. Children talk about the mind,1995 被引 8    
3.  Baron-Cohen,S. Mindblindness:An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind,1995 被引 2    
4.  Carlson,S.M. Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. CHILD DEVELOPMENT,2001,72:1032-1053 被引 18    
5.  Dunn,J. Young children's understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs:Individual differences and their antecedents. CHILD DEVELOPMENT,1991,62:1352-1366 被引 8    
6.  Flavell,J.H. An analysis of cognitive-developmental sequences. GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY MONOGRAPHS,1972,86:279-350 被引 1    
7.  Guttman,L. A basis of scaling quantitative data. American Sociological Review,1944,9:139-150 被引 8    
8.  Guttman,L. The basis of scalogram analysis. Measurement and prediction,1950:60-90 被引 5    
9.  Green,B.E. A method of scalogram analysis using summary statistics. Psychometrica,1956,21:79-88 被引 1    
10.  Happe,F.G.E. An advanced test of theory of mind:Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic,mentally handicapped,and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders,1994,24:129-154 被引 3    
11.  Harris,P.L. Children's understanding of the distinction between real and apparent emotion. CHILD DEVELOPMENT,1986,57:895-909 被引 5    
12.  Harris,P.L. Language and children's understanding of mental states. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE,2005,14:69-73 被引 3    
13.  Lalonde,C.E. False belief understanding goes to school:On the social-emotional consequences of coming early or late to a first theory of mind. Cognition and Emotion,1995,9:167-185 被引 3    
14.  Leslie,A.M. ToMM,ToBy,and Agency:Core architecture and domain specificity in cognition and culture. Mapping the Mind:Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture,1994:119-148 被引 1    
15.  Lillard,A. Ethnopsychologies:Cultural variations in theories of mind. Psychological Bulletin,1998,123:2-32 被引 1    
16.  Linacre,J.M. A User's Guide to BIGSTEPS:Rasch Model Computer Programs,1994 被引 1    
17.  Linacre,J.M. User's Guide and Program Manual to WINSTEPS:Rasch Model Compute Programs,2003 被引 1    
18.  Nisbett,R.E. The geography of thought:How Asians and Westerners think differently-and why,2003 被引 1    
19.  Pratt,C. Young children understand that looking leads to knowing(so long as they are looking into a single barrel). CHILD DEVELOPMENT,1990,61:973-982 被引 3    
20.  Perner,J. Three-year-olds' difficulty with false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1987,5:125-137 被引 9    
引证文献 5

1 张丽锦 4,5岁儿童一般语言能力和心理理论关系的纵向研究 心理学报,2010,42(12):1166-1174
被引 0 次

2 于静 儿童公平行为的发展----来自博弈实验的证据 心理科学进展,2010,18(7):1182-1188
被引 11

显示所有5篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号