居住空间对家庭购物出行决策的影响
The Influence of Residential Space on Household Shopping Tour Decision-Making Behaviors
查看参考文献26篇
|
文摘
|
利用2007年北京市民活动日志调查的第一手数据,建立了强调家庭和决策过程的嵌套Logit模型,探讨居住空间对购物出行行为的影响,并在居住空间尺度上模拟评估土地利用政策对居民购物出行优化的作用.结果表明,居住区位的差异往往导致居民通过调整其生活方式(如购物出行模式)来适应,而非直接显著影响其购物出行需求(反映在家庭购物出行频率).居住地商业密度对购物出行频率和出行模式决策的影响均存在明显的空间分异,且需求弹性均随着商业密度的变化而变化.这说明需要针对不同区位、不同居住空间、不同出行需求弹性情况来实施不同的土地利用政策和规划,以便优化购物出行需求.同时,城市居民购物出行模式的调整优化既需要居住空间的土地利用调整也需要交通设施和交通状况本身的改善. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The relationship between urban form and non-work activity-travel has received considerable attention in the recent debates over the area of transportation, urban studies and geography. In this paper, we formulate and estimate a nested model structure that includes the choice of shopping frequency of each household in the upper level, the allocation of household member to shopping task in the middle nest, and the choice of shopping tour pattern of residents in the lower nest. Data for the analysis are drawn from a 2007 Beijing activity dairy survey, including 516 households and 1110 residents in 10 communities distributed from urban core to suburb. The estimated results, with the methods of full information maximum likelihood (FIML), indicate that the difference of residential location does not significantly influent the household shopping travel demand such as tour frequency, however, obviously lead to diverse individual's everyday lifestyle such as shopping tour pattern to offset the impact of location. And the variable of residential dura-tion, supposed as measurement of the cognition about residential space, merely significantly affects all levels of the shopping decision-making behaviors. Moreover, from the result of the simulation with changing the residential shopping density from 0.1M to 2.5M (M is current shopping density), we can draw a conclusion that the elasticity of shopping tour demand is not invariable for the rea- son that in some range (0.7M to 1.4M) the demand is elastic and in other case (<0.7M) is inelastic when the density is changing. And the elasticity varies between the location of intra-four-circle and outer-four-circle. It means that different land-use policies should be carried out in different region inside city, according to residential elasticity of shopping tour demand and the current situ-ation of residential land-use, to optimize the shopping tour frequency. Meanwhile, the result tells us that the probability of choosing only-shop-to-home (OSH) pattern of suburb residents is the most largest, not only for the reason that the lower commercial density in suburb, but also the worse accessibility between suburb residential districts and CBD in urban core, such as lacking of transfer convenience and unpredicted traffic jam in Beijing city, all of which prevent the individu-al taking risks to carry out other activity in the long-distance activity pattern. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2009,28(3):362-369 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
购物行为决策
;
活动分析法
;
居住空间
;
出行模式
;
嵌套Logit模型
;
北京市
|
|
地址
|
北京大学城市与经济地理系, 北京, 100871
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
北京大学林肯研究中心论文奖学金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3654276
|
参考文献 共
26
共2页
|
|
1.
Kelly B. The transportation and land use link.
Journal of Planning Literature,1994,9(2):28-32
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
阎小培.
高密度开发城市的交通系统与土地利用:以广州为例,2006
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
张文佳. 基于家庭的城市居民出行需求理论与验证模型.
地理学报,2008,63(12):1246-1256
|
被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Shiftan Y. The use of activity-based modeling to analyze the effect of land-use policies on travel behavior.
Annals of Regional Science,2008,42:79-97
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Handy S. Regional versus local accessibility:Implications for nonwork travel.
Transportation Research Record,1993,1400:58-66
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Boarnet M G. Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics.
Urban Studies,1998,35(7):1155-1169
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Agyemang-Duah K. Trip generation for shopping travel.
Transportation Research Record,1996,1493:12-20
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Zhang M. Exploring the relationship between urban form and nonwork travel through time use analysis.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2005,73:244-261
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Homer M W. Is non-work travel excessive?.
Journal of Transport Geography,2007,15:411-416
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Ewing R. Land use impacts on trip generation rates.
Transportation Research Record,1996,1518:1-6
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Handy S. Urban form and pedestrian choices:studies of Austin neighborhoods.
Transportation Research Record,1996,1552:135-144
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Handy S. Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel.
Transportation,2001,28:317-346
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Yun D S. Modeling the day-of-the-week shopping activity and travel patterns.
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,1997,31(4):307-319
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Limanond T. Effect of land use on decisions of shopping tour generation:A case study of three traditional neighborhoods in WA.
Transportation,2004,31:153-181
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
仵宗卿. 天津市民购物行为特征研究.
地理科学,2000,20(06):534-539
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
陈零极. 上海市民大型超市购物行为特征研究.
人文地理,2006(5):124-129
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
王德. 王府井商业街消费者行为特征分析.
商业经济,2007(9):16-19
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
仵宗卿. 购物出行空间的等级结构研究—以天津市为例.
地理研究,2001,20(4):479-488
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
王德. 上海市消费者出行特征与商业空间结构分析.
城市规划,2001,25(10):6-14
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
冯健. 北京市居民购物行为空间结构演变.
地理学报,2007,62(10):1083-1096
|
被引
35
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问