西方城市社会空间结构研究回顾及进展
A Review of the Urban Social Structure and Its Development in Western Countries
查看参考文献54篇
|
文摘
|
从城市因子生态分析的视角对近60年的西方城市社会空间结构研究进行回顾,尝试理清其发展的整个脉络和阶段特征,以期为处于发展期的中国城市地理研究提供有价值的经验借鉴.基于因子生态方法的西方城市社会空间结构研究发展过程可以划分为四个阶段:①20世纪50-60年代城市"社会区"概念提出,研究范式发展完善阶段;②60-70年代末期,城市社会空间结构实证案例积累阶段;③80年代初-90年代末,城市社会空间结构实证研究比较总结阶段;④1990年代末至今,城市社会空间结构研究多元化发展阶段.对中国城市社会空间结构研究的借鉴意义有:①基于因子生态的城市社会空间结构研究具有较强的可比性,有助于中国城市社会空间结构特征归纳;②今后中国城市社会区空间结构的实证研究应重视空间过程的演化分析;③将城市因子生态分析的定量结果作为实证分析的基础,从定性的角度深入探讨其形成机制、比较归纳中国城市社会区空间结构的特征及与西方城市社会区空间结构的共性与差异. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
In this paper we review the nearly 60 years process of urban social areas structure research in Western countries with the eye of the factorial ecology. We straighten out the whole context of its development stages and characteristics, and think these valuable experiences are helpful to the contemporary China's urban geography studies. The nearly 60 years process of urban social areas structure research can be divided into four phases: the first stage is that social areas concept was advanced and its research paradigm developed in 1950-1960; the second is many empirical cases accumulation stage in the 1960s to the late 1970s; in the third phase from the 1980s to the late 1990s, the scholars paid attention to the comparison and summary from the kinds of cases; and the fourth is diversified development stage since the late 1990s.Urban socio-spatial structure in Western countries has been extensively analyzed since the 1950s. Shevky and Bell (1949) initiated social area analysis in the study of Los Angeles and San Francisco. In China, there have been many studies of the social structure of major cities using the Fifth National Population Census data at the subdistrict (jiedao) level recently. Chinese scholars carried out research in the cities of Guangzhou, Beijing, Shanghai, Nanchang and so on, but the research fruits of urban social areas on China' s city are rather limited.Finally, this research puts forward some suggestions on the development and study of urban social geography in China. Compared with the numerous case studies based on factorial ecology in Western countries, our urban social structure research should focus more on urban social analysis case studies, fortunately the Fifth National Population Census data is a good available research material to be used. Many comparable Chinese urban case studies based on factorial ecology would be helpful to summing up the characteristics of Chinese urban internal structure and comparing with the Western classic models. At the same time, the spatiotemporal process analysis must be emphasized on these case studies, we could use some years of the National Population Census for instance the Third and the Fourth National Population Census data to rebuild the transformation of urban social areas after the reform and opening-up in the 1980s. Chinese urban social structure studies should be extended. The reason and mechanism of urban social structure and its process in China are needed to go further to excavate. The authors suggest that Chinese urban researchers should combine the qualitative analysis with the quantitative analysis, use the result of the urban factorial ecology, summarize the characteristics of Chinese urban social structure, compare with the urban social structure in the western countries, and analyse the differences and resemblances of each other. |
|
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2009,28(1):93-102 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
城市社会区
;
空间结构
;
因子生态分析
|
|
地址
|
1.
南京大学地理与海洋科学学院, 江苏, 南京, 210093
2.
美国亚利桑那州立大学,地理科学学院, 美国, 85287
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
教育部国家建设高水平大学项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3559732
|
参考文献 共
54
共3页
|
|
1.
王开泳. 城市社会空间结构研究的回顾与展望.
热带地理,2005,25(1):28-32
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
李健. 西方城市社会地理学主要理论及研究的意义.
城市问题,2006,6:84-94
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
魏立华. 有关"社会主义转型国家"城市社会空间的研究评述.
人文地理,2006,4:7-12
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
吕拉昌. 中国城市地理研究的若干问题:海外学者的观点.
人文地理,2006,2:67-71
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
李健. 西方城市社会地理学研究进展及对中国研究的意义.
地理科学,2008,28(1):124-130
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Shevky Eshref.
The Social Areas of Los Angeles,1949
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Herbert D T. Social area analysis:A British study.
URBAN STUDIES,1967,6:41-60
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
NcElrath D C. Societal scale and social differentiation,Accra,Ghana.
The New Urbanization,1968
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Bell Wendell. Economic,family,and ethnic status:An empirical test.
American Sociological Review,1955,20:45-52
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Anderson Theodore R. The Shevky-Bell Social Areas:Confirmation of results and reinterpretation.
Social Forces,1961,60:119-124
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
McElrath D C. The Social Areas of Rome:A Comparative.
American Sociological Review,1962,27:376-391
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Sweeter Frank L.
Patterns of Change in the Social Ecology of Metropolitan Boston:1950～1960,1962
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Schmid Calvin F. Ecological and demographic indices:A methodological analysis.
DEMOGRAPHY,1964,1:194-211
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Jones F Lancaster. A social profile of Canberra 1961.
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology,1965,1:107-120
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Berry B J L.
Metropolitan Planning Guidelines:Commercial Structure,1965
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Carey George W. The regional interpretation of Manhattan population and housing patterns through factor analysis.
The Geographical Review,1966,56:551-569
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Robert A Murdie.
Factorial Ecology of Metropolitan Toronto 1951-1961:An Essay on the Social Geography of the City,1969
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Brian J L Berry.
Contemporary Urban Ecology,1977
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Robert A Murdie. Factor scores:A neglected element of factorial ecology studies.
URBAN GEOGRAPHY,1980,1(4):295-316
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Eugene D Perle. Perspectives on the change ecological structure of suburbia.
URBAN GEOGRAPHY,1981,2(3):237-254
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问