碳排放空间分配及其对中国区域功能的影响
The Carbon Emission Permits Allocation and Its Impact on Regional Functions in China
查看参考文献24篇
文摘
|
碳排放空间的分配直接决定了一个国家减排责任,不同的分配方案对中国的区域功能的实现将产生显著的影响.本文对目前碳排放空间分配的原则、标准以及模型方法等进行了综述;以我国发展为出发点,分析了不同类型的碳排放空间分配方案的优劣势,并且对不同分配方案下中国在获取可获得的碳排放空间进行了比较;中国的历史碳排放量相对较小,并且拥有众多的人口数量,因此基于历史公平和人均原则的分配方案最为有利;在未来要缓解来自国内外的巨大的减排压力,在获取碳排放空间方面,中国不仅需要在国际谈判中坚持按人均分配以及历史公平原则,还要进行更多的科学研究,进而提出"中国方案". |
其他语种文摘
|
Climate change is one of the issues under heated discussion now. People believe that carbon emission is highly related to glabal warming. Therefore, all nations in the world should take responsibility to solve this problem that may affect every continent, every nation, every area, every household and even every individual. After years of international negotiation, it is time for action. The space for carbon emission is important to a country, especially a booming country like China. This article aims to introduce the principles and indicators for the spatial distribution of carbon emission. Meanwhile, it also focuses on the analysis of how different shemes would impact regional fuctions. To find out a widely-accepted blueprint is of great importance to the world. China has some advantages in getting more space for carbon emissions. First, China has a large population. Second, since the country has developed vigorously for just a couple of years, the total amount of carbon emission is much smaller than developed countries. Third, China is in a different stage of development from countries that have already formed a mature society, so it is unfair to compare carbon emission amount in China with that in the US or other countries. Forth, it is a common view that all nations are responsible to carbon emission and global warming, but the degrees and aspects of responsibility are different. Fifth, the products made in China are used all over the world. In other words, we are manufacturing goods for others, and the responsibilities of manufacturers and consumers should be different. China has strong allies in the international climate negotiation to hold our points. Thus the schemes which are based on per capita indicators and have considered the total carbon emission throughout history are favorable. As global warming has become increasingly serious, the disputes between countyies would aggravate. Each country will do anything to get the greatest benefit possible. Then it will be more difficult for China to get appropriate space for carbon emission. Meanwhile, the above mentioned advantages are disappearing. China will face great challenges in getting enough space for carbon emission, which is almost equal to the space for the spring-up on her way of sustainable development. To respond the presses from both home and abroad with reason, we need more research on carbon emission, and a "China scheme" is preferred. |
来源
|
资源科学
,2009,31(4):590-597 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
碳排放空间
;
公平原则
;
分配标准
;
区域功能
|
地址
|
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1007-7588 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家科技职称计划重点项目课题
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3516156
|
参考文献 共
24
共2页
|
1.
.
http://www cchina.gov.cn/file/source/ea/ea200208025.htm,2008
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
MNP.
China now no.1 in CO2 emissions;USA in second position
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
3.
IEA. 世界能源展望.
World energy outlook,2007
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
4.
中国国家发展和改革委员会.
中国应对气候变化国家方案,2007
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
5.
庄贵阳. 气候变化与可持续发展.
环境政治与国际关系,2004(4):50-56
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
张海滨. 中国与国际气候变化谈判.
国际政治研究,2007(1):21-36
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
7.
中国气候变化国别研究组.
中国气候变化国别研究,2000
|
被引
38
次
|
|
|
|
8.
张志强. 温室气体排放评价指标及其定量分析.
地理学报,2008,63(7):693-702
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
9.
徐玉高. 碳权分配:全球碳排放权交易及参与激励.
数量经济技术经济研究,1997(3):72-77
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
10.
王伟中. 稳定大气CO_2浓度和碳排放权分配问题.
经济前沿,2002(10):18-21
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
何健坤. 有关全球气候变化问题上的公平性分析.
中国人口资源与环境,2004,14(6):12-15
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
缪旭明. 人均CO_2累积排放和按贡献值履行义务的研究.
中国软科学,1998(9):28-23
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
陈文颖. 全球未来碳排放权"两个趋同"的分配方法.
清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):850-854
|
被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
14.
陈文颖. 气候变化的历史责任与碳排放限额分配.
中国环境科学,1998,18(6):481-485
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
15.
王伟中. <京都议定书>和碳排放权分配问题.
清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,6(17):81-86
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
陈文颖. 碳排放权分配与碳排放权交易.
清华大学学报(自然科学版),1998,38(12):15-18
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
17.
徐嵩龄. 试论国际环境条件中的公平与效率原则:兼评全球CO?2减排规则.
数量经济技术经济研究,1999(4):10-14
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
18.
任国玉. 世界各国CO_2排放历史和现状.
气象科技,2002,30(3):129-135
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
19.
徐玉高. 气候变化问题上的平等权利原则.
世界环境,2002(2):17-21
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
高广生. 气候变化与碳排放空间分配.
气候变化研究进展,2006,2(6):301-305
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|