帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

中国企业开发式学习与利用式学习平衡的实证研究
Balance between exploitation learning and exploration learning of Chinese enterprises

查看参考文献23篇

于海波 1   郑晓明 2   方俐洛 3   凌文辁 4  
文摘 在构建创新型国家的当今中国,企业开发式学习和利用式学习的平衡是管理理论和实践中的焦点问题.在全国10个城市110家企业进行问卷调查,得到677份有效问卷.结构方程模型分析结果表明,利用式学习和开发式学习是企业学习的两个方面,而不是一个连续体的两个端点.多层回归分析结果表明,利用式学习和开发式学习对财务绩效有显著的积极影响;二者对财务绩效有显著的交互作用:在高利用式学习条件下,开发式学习对财务绩效有显著的积极影响,但在低利用式学习条件下,开发式学习对财务绩效没有显著影响;利用式学习和开发式学习的差对财务绩效没有显著影响.这启发我国企业要在保持高水平的利用式学习的条件下,再提高开发式学习的水平.
其他语种文摘 Today, there were few systematic empirical researches directly linking the balance of the two learning with organiza- tional performance. Six hundred and seventy seven employees from 10 cities in China answered the questionnaire. The results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed that exploration learning and exploitation learning were two sides of enterprise lean- ing rather than two end point of a continuum. The results of Hierarchical Regression Analysis ( HRA) showed that exploration learning and exploitation learning were significantly positively related to finance performance. And the results also showed that there were positive and significant interaction effects between exploration learning and exploitation learning for finance perform- ance. And the difference between exploitation learning and exploration learning was non - significantly related to the finance per- formance. The main implication was that Chinese enterprises should improve the level of exploitation learning before strengthening exploration learning.
来源 科研管理 ,2008,29(6):137-144 【核心库】
关键词 利用式学习 ; 开发式学习 ; 组织学习 ; 财务绩效 ; 平衡
地址

1. 北京师范大学, 北京  

2. 清华大学, 北京  

3. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京  

4. 暨南大学, 广东, 广州

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1000-2995
学科 社会科学总论
基金 北京师范大学社会科学基金项目 ;  中国科学院知识创新工程项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:3498423

参考文献 共 23 共2页

1.  March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87 被引 284 次    
2.  Crossan M. An organizational learning framework:from intuition to institution. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW,1999,24(3):522-537 被引 47 次    
3.  Gupta A K. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,2006,49(4):693-706 被引 57 次    
4.  Vassolo R S. Non-additivity in portfolios of exploration activities:a real options-based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal,2004,25:1045-1061 被引 6 次    
5.  Vermeulen F. Learning through acquisitions. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,2001,44:457-478 被引 12 次    
6.  Baum J A C. Making the next move:How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains'acquisitions. Administrative Science Journal,2000,45:766-801 被引 1 次    
7.  Zi-Lin H. Exploration VS.exploitation:an empifical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science,2004,15:481-494 被引 2 次    
8.  Argyris C. Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective,1978 被引 33 次    
9.  Senge P. The Fifth Discipline:The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization,1990 被引 8 次    
10.  March J G. Rational!ty,foolishness,and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management Journal,2006,27:201-214 被引 12 次    
11.  Beckman C M. Friends or strangers?Firm-specific uncertainty,market uncertainty,and network partner selection. Organization Science,2004,15:259-275 被引 8 次    
12.  Beckman CM. Theinfluence of~undingteam company affiliafions on firm behavior. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,2006,49:741-758 被引 8 次    
13.  Holmqvist M. A dynamic model of intra-and interorganizafional leaning. ORGANIZATION STUDIES,2003,24(1):95-123 被引 6 次    
14.  Levinthal D A. The myopia of learning. Strategic of management Journal,1993,14:95-112 被引 78 次    
15.  Burgelman R A. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY,2002,47:325-357 被引 14 次    
16.  Tushman M L. Ambidextrous organizations:Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Colifornia Management Review,1996,38:8-30 被引 1 次    
17.  Eisenhardt K M. Dynamic capabilities:what are they?. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21:1105-1121 被引 133 次    
18.  Katila R. Something old,something new:A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,2002,45:1183-1194 被引 87 次    
19.  于海波. 企业组织的学习结构. 心理学报,2006,38(4):590-597 被引 8 次    
20.  Calantone R J. Learning ofientation,finn innovation capability,and finn performance. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT,2002,31:515-524 被引 28 次    
引证文献 2 篇

1 王为东 基于企业学习策略的集群持续创新机制及实证研究 南开管理评论,2009,12(6):27-33,41
被引 0 次

2 张娜娜 管理学习对技术进步的贡献与路径研究 科学学研究,2017,35(10):1508-1517
被引 2 次

显示所有2篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号