基于多目标权重分析的草地适宜放牧率探讨
Studies on optimum grazing rates in grasslands based on a multi-objectives weighting analysis
查看参考文献44篇
|
文摘
|
依据生态系统服务的理念，首次发展了生态系统服务指数（ESI），试图通过对生态系统服务功能的综合考虑，提出科学的适宜放牧率的评价方法。本研究利用美国北达科他州立大学中部草原研究站17年长期放牧试验数据，选取植物多样性Shannon-Wiener指数、地上净初级生产力、土壤表层含水量和单位面积家畜增重4个指标，通过对不同指标分别赋予不同的权重，计算不同管理目标下ESI及其稳定性，并对单目标管理与多目标管理进行了比较研究。结果表明，对于北美混合普列里（Prairie）草地，围封不利用或建立自然保护区，虽然生态系统比较稳定，但既不能有效的提高植物多样性、初级生产力和土壤水分含量等生态功能，又没有畜产品产出；而在重牧或极重牧处理下虽然获得了较大的畜产品生产，但导致了草地生态系统的退化和较大的系统不稳定性。因此，这2种管理方式在实践中都是不可取的。应用生态系统服务指数综合考虑，认为应该权衡各项生态功能和生产功能，此时轻牧或中牧是最适宜的。因此，ESI的建立避免了单项指标的评价偏差，使得适宜放牧率的确定更加合理。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Based on ecosystem services theory, an ecosystem services index （ESI） is proposed to ascertain the optimum grazing rate. This paper used 17 years data from the Central Grasslands Research Extension Center, North Dakota State University, USA, including the plant biodiversity （PB） Shannon- Wiener index, aboveground net primary productivity （ANPP）, soil water （SW）, and total beef gain per unit （TBG）. Different weightings were given to different indexes and the ESI and CV were calculated to compare single-objective and multi-objectives. In the prairies of North America, ungrazed or nature reserves were helpful in maintaining the stability of ecosystems, but had low PB, ANPP, SW and TBG. High or extreme grazing intensity resulted in bigger beef gains per unit, but led to degradation of grasslands and lower stability. Thus, neither of these indexes gave optimum grazing rates in practice. The ecosystem services index showed that a light or moderate grazing rate would give a better balance between ecosystem function and production. Thus the construction of the ESI avoids the problems of single indexes and results in a more balanced grazing rate. |
|
来源
|
草业学报
,2008,17(4):149-158 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
适宜放牧率
;
生态系统服务指数
;
多目标权重分析
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院植物研究所, 植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京, 100093
2.
中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 高原生物适应与进化重点实验室, 青海, 西宁, 810082
3.
美国北达科他州州立大学中部草原研究站, 美国
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1004-5759 |
|
学科
|
畜牧、动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院知识创新工程西部行动计划项目
;
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
;
中国科学院择优支持项目资助
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3353890
|
参考文献 共
44
共3页
|
|
1.
Ayres R U. The price-value paradox.
Ecological Economics,1998,25:17-19
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Balvanera P. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services.
Ecology Letters,2006,9:1146-1156
|
被引
128
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Chanasyk D S. Quantification and simulation of soil water on grazed fescue watersheds.
Journal of Range Management,2004,57:169-177
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Chen Z X. Value of ecosystem services in China.
China Science Bulletin,2000,45:870-875
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Conant R T. Grassland management and conversion into grassland:Effects on soil carbon.
Eeo-logical Application,2001,11(2):343-355
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Costanza R. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.
Nature,1997,387:253-260
|
被引
3579
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Costanza R. Introduction to the special issue on the dynamics and value of ecosystem services:Integrating economics and ecological perspectives.
Ecological Economics,2002,41:367-373
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Daily G.
Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems,1997
|
被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Dorrough J. Plant responses to livestock grazing frequency in an Australian temperate grassland.
Ecography,2004,27:798-810
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Elmore A J. Effects of grazing intensity on soil carbon stocks following deforestation of a Hawaiian dry tropical forest.
Global Change Biology,2006,12:1761-1772
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Hayes G E. Cattle grazing impacts on annual forbs and vegetation composition of mesic grasslands in California.
Conservation Biology,2003,17(6):1694-1702
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Holechek J K.
Range Management Principles and Practices,1989
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Lemaire G. Challenges for grassland science:Managing research priorities.
Agriculture Ecosystems Environment,2005,108:99-108
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Mcintype S. The relative importance of cattle grazing in subtropical grasslands:Does it reduce or enhance plant biodiversity.
Journal of Applied Ecology,2003,40:445-457
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Millennium Assessment.
Ecosystems and Human Well-being:Synthesis,2005
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Norton B E. Guidelines for determining stocking rates for saline shrubland.
Reclamation and Revegetation Research,1986,5:1-3
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Oba G. Relationships between biomass and plant species richness in arid-zone grazing lands.
Journal of Applies Ecology,2001,38:836-845
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Pan X B. Evaluation of ecosystem services provided by the Coteau Rangeland of North Dakota.
CGREC Grass and Beef Annual Report,2005,1:9-11
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Patton B D. Effects of grazing intensity precipitateon temperature on forage production.
Rangeland Ecological& Management,2007,60(6):656-665
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Pratt M.
Determining Your Stocking Rate,2001:2-3
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问