帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统
Two Systems in Decision-making and Reasoning： Heuristic System and Analytic System

查看参考文献39篇

孙彦 1   李纾 1   殷晓莉 2  
文摘 近来,在决策与推理的研究中,研究者提出了双系统作用模型：基于直觉的启发式系统和基于理性的分析系统。启发式系统加工速度较快,不占用或占用很少的心理资源,容易受背景相似性、刻板印象的影响;分析系统加工速度慢,占用较多的心理资源,遵从逻辑和规则,而且两个系统有不同进化历史和神经基础。该文根据已有的相关研究,综述了双系统在决策与推理中可能的作用机制、相互关系、个体差异,同时指出了目前研究存在的不足。
其他语种文摘 Researchers in decision-making and reasoning have recently proposed that there are two distinct cognitive systems: heuristic system and controlled analytic system. The former is a relatively effortless system that relies on prior knowledge, judgmental heuristics, and immediate experience; the latter is a slower, effortful, resource-dependent, rule-based one. The two systems have sharply differing evolutionary histories and neuro-logical substrates. The mechanism of the two systems in decision-making and reasoning process, the relationship of them, the individual difference variables and some limitations were also discussed in this article.
来源 心理科学进展 ,2007,15(5):721-726 【扩展库】
关键词 启发式系统 ; 分析系统 ; 决策 ; 推理
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101  

2. 青岛理工大学, 青岛, 266033

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1671-3710
学科 社会科学总论
基金 中国科学院“百人计划”项目 ;  国家自然科学基金（70671099）项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:2975713

参考文献 共 39 共2页

1.  Sloman S A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,1996,119:3-22 被引 35 次    
2.  Evans J S B T. Logical and human reasoning:An assessment of the deductive paradigm. Psychological Bulletin,2002,128:978-996 被引 16 次    
3.  Evans J S B T. In two minds:dual-process account of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2003,7:454-459 被引 38 次    
4.  Stanovich K E. Individual differences in reasoning:Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral&Brain Sciences,2000,23:645-726 被引 32 次    
5.  Kahneman D. Representativeness revisited:Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and Biases:the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment,2002:49-81 被引 7 次    
6.  Sloman S A. Two systems of reasoning. Heuristics and Biases:the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment,2002:379-396 被引 2 次    
7.  Tversky A. External versus intuitive reasoning:The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review,1983,90:293-315 被引 12 次    
8.  Osman M. An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin&Review,2004,11(6):988-1010 被引 3 次    
9.  Roberts M J. Inspection times the change task and rapid-response selection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2002,54:1031-1048 被引 3 次    
10.  Evans J S B T. Rapid responding increases belief bias:evidence for the dual process theory of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning,2005,11:382-389 被引 6 次    
11.  Ferreira M B. Automatic and Controlled Components of Judgment and Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006,91:797-813 被引 12 次    
12.  Goel V. Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition,2003,87:11-22 被引 16 次    
13.  Petty R E. The elaboration likelihood model:current status and controversies. Dual-process theories in social psychology,1999:73-96 被引 1 次    
14.  Epley N. Are Adjustments Insufficient. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2004,30:447-460 被引 6 次    
15.  Epley N. The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic. Psychological Science,2006,17:311-318 被引 18 次    
16.  Gilbert D T. Inferential correction. Heuristics and Biases:the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment,2002:167-184 被引 1 次    
17.  Epley N. Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2004,87:327-339 被引 20 次    
18.  Simmons J P. Intuitive Confidence:Choosing between Intuitive and Nonintuitive Alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2006,135:409-428 被引 7 次    
19.  Brewer M B. A dual-process model of impression formation. Advances in social cognition,1988:1-36 被引 9 次    
20.  Fiske S T. The continuum model:Ten years later. Dual-process theories in social psychology,1999:231-254 被引 3 次    
引证文献 61 篇

1 宋仲玲 投资行为中的突显、过度自信、高估现象研究 心理科学,2008,31(6):1489-1492,1488
被引 0 次

2 李纾 无限理性还是有限理性？——齐当别抉择模型在经济行为中的应用 管理评论,2009,21(5):103-114
被引 8 次

显示所有61篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

iAuthor 链接
李纾 0000-0003-4402-1674
版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号