团队作业与团队互动两类共享心智模型的发展特征
Developmental Characteristics of Two Types of Shared Mental Models
查看参考文献29篇
文摘
|
共享心智模型指团队成员关于团队作业、策略、团队情境、团队互动等的共同的知识结构,根据内容不同可以分为团队作业模型和团队互动模型两类。该研究通过实验室实验探讨两类共享心智模型的发展特征。132名大学生组成44个3人团队,随机分为团队绩效反馈组和无团队绩效反馈组。采用相似性评定法在团队执行作业前、中、后三次测量两类共享心智模型。结果发现:(1)共享心智模型随团队运作时间增加而发展;(2)团队互动模型形成和发展的难度高于团队作业模型;(3)团队绩效反馈对两类心智模型发展的作用不同,反馈加速了团队作业模型的发展速度,但却是团队互动模型能否得以发展的决定性因素。两类共享心智模型的不同发展特征应归因于两者特异性高低的不同。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Shared mental models (SMMs) were defined as team members'shared understandings about team task, task context and strategies, team interaction patterns, and teammates'traits. Team task models and team interaction models were distinguished as two types of SMMs. It has been showed that SMMs can enhance the efficiency of team processes and team performance. Although researchers have focused on antecedents and consequences of SMMs, little research has been conducted to examine the development of SMMs. The current study aimed to investigate how two types of SMMs developed from low to high level.
Totally 132 student participants formed 44 3-person teams to perform on a simulation task, which was developed particularly for the current study. Among them, 23 teams were provided with team performance feedback during task execution, the other 21 teams were under no-feedback condition. Participants were randomly assigned to feedback conditions and to positions within teams. Mental models (MMs) were elicited using participants" individual paired ratings of the relatedness among key concepts of team task or interaction behavior before, during and after task execution. Pathfinder, a network-analysis computer program, could represent each member's MMs based on the matrix of paired ratings, and could offer a closeness index ( C were averaged to form the index) to reflect the similarity of MMs between each pair of teammates. Three " C " indexes team similarity score.
Results of mixed-model ANOVA showed that: a) similarity of mental models increased significantly over time; b) similarity of task models was significantly higher than that of interaction models; and c) similarity of task models in- creased faster under feedback condition than under no-feedback condition, whereas similarity of interaction models in- creased significantly only under feedback condition. Differences in the development of these two models were discussed in terms of whether the models were task-specific in natureThe results indicate that the development of team task models and team interaction models might have different features, and that team performance feedback might have different effects on the development of these two models. |
来源
|
心理学报
,2006,38(4):598-606 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
团队
;
共享心智模型
;
相似性评定
;
绩效反馈
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
ISSN
|
0439-755X |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金资助项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2662965
|
参考文献 共
29
共2页
|
1.
Sundstrom E. Work teams:Applications and effectiveness.
American Psychologist,1990,45(2):120-133
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Levine J M. Progress in small group research.
Annual Review of Psychology,1990,41:585-634
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Guzzo R A. Teams in organizations:Recent research on performance and effectiveness.
Annual Review of Psychology,1996,47:307-338
|
被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Campion M A. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness:Implications for designing effective work groups.
Personnel Psychology,1993,46(4):823-850
|
被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Hackman J R. The design of work teams.
Handbook of organizational behavior,1987:315-342
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Guzzo R A. Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations.
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed.),1992,3:269-313
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Ilgen D R. Teams in organizations:From input-process-output models to imoi models.
Annual Review of Psychology,2005,56(1):517-543
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Klimoski R.
Journal of Management,1994,20(Spec Issue2):403-437
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Kraiger K. Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness.
Team performance assessment and measurement:Theory,methods,and applications,1997:63-84
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Rouse W B. On looking into the black box:Prospects and limits in the search for mental models.
Psychological Bulletin,1986,100(3):349-363
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Wilson J R. Mental models:Theory and application in human factors.
Human Factors,1989,31(6):617-634
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Cannon-Bowers J A. Shared mental models in expert team decision making.
Individual and group decision making:Current issues,1993:221-246
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Mathieu J E. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2000,85(2):273-283
|
被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Volpe C E.
Human Factors,1996,38(1):87-100
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Cannon-Bowers J A. The impact of cross-training and workload on team functioning:A replication and extension of initial findings.
Human Factors,1998,40(1):92-101
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Marks M A. Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2000,85(6):971-986
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Rentsch J R. Why do"great minds"think alike?Antecedents of team member schema agreement.
Journal of Organizational Behavior,2001,22(2):107-120
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Cannon M D. Confronting failure:Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups.
Journal of Organizational Behavior,2001,22(2):161-177
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Marks M A. The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2002,87(1):3-13
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
20.
McCann C.
Ergonomics,2000,43(8):1095-1110
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|