自然与环境资源价值评估的误区
Critique on Non-market Valuation of Natural and Environmental Resources
查看参考文献29篇
|
文摘
|
资源环境价值计量近年来成为资源与环境经济学的研究热点,但却因为在许多最基本的问题上迷失了方向,产生了不少似是而非的问题.被混淆的问题包括:①实物意义上的稀缺与经济学上的稀缺;②使用价值与交换价值;③边际价值与全部价值;④成本与价值;⑤个人消费者价值与社会价值.论文主要目的是通过澄清这些问题来指出如何对自然与环境资源估价. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
This paper attempts to distinguish the differences between the following pairs of con-cepts tphysical scarcity versus economic scarcity.intrinsic value versus exchange value, marginal value versus total value,cost versus value,consumer willingness to pay(WTP)versus shadow value. The purpose of non-market valuation is for efficient allocation of scare resources. There are many kinds of values.Only the exchange value can be used to guide resource allocation.lt is pointed out that the economic scarcity of a resource is reflected in price when market exists.or shadow value when the market does not exist.Measuring total value often does not make sense when we deal with resource allocation since our decision is usually marginal change.lt is particularly argued that WTP is not a good indicator to measure resource scarcity and guide resource allocation.lt is emphasized that that non-market valuation should be conducted in the framework of demand and supply and in the marginal perspective.Appraisal value is suggested as a potential alternative for non-market valuation. |
|
来源
|
自然资源学报
,2005,20(3):453-460 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
价值评估
;
条件估价法
;
消费者价值
;
影子价值
|
|
地址
|
1.
School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, USA, Auburn
2.
Dept. of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, USA, New Brunswick
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-3037 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:1991029
|
参考文献 共
29
共2页
|
|
1.
Kahneman D. the purchase of moral satisfaction [J].
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1992,14(1):57-70
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Knetsch J L. some problems of wrong questions and misleading answers [J].
Environmental Values,1994,3:351-368
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Diamond P A. is some number better than no number[J].
Journal of Economic Perspectives,1994,8(4):45-64
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Freeman A M Ⅲ. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values (2nd edition)[C].
Resources for the Future,2003
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Boyle K J. Contingent valuation in practice [A].
Primer on Nonmarket Valuation,2003
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
De Gregori T. a institutional theory [J].
Journal of Economaic Issues,1987,21(3):1243-1247
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
张五常. 经济解释[M].
经济解释,2002:45
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Costanza R d'Arge. The value of the world's ecosystem resources and natural capital [J].
Nature,1997,387:253-260
|
被引
3579
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Ehrlich P. Betrayal of Science and Reason [M].
Betrayal of Science and Reason,1996
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Pimentel D. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity [J].
Bioscience,1997,47:747-757
|
被引
68
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
周冰冰. 北京市森林资源价值[M].
北京市森林资源价值,2000
|
被引
48
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Van Kooten G C. a critical review [J].
Environmental Science & Policy,1998(1):13-25
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
张耀启. 森林生态效益经济补偿问题初探[J].
林业经济,1997(2):70-76
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
谢高地. 全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].
资源科学,2001,23(6):29-35
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
McKenney D. Resource economists should do more cost analysis and less benefit analysis [B].
Working papers in Ecological Economics No.9801,1998
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Hyde W F. Timber Supply.
Land Allocation and Economic Efficiency,1980
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Chehrazi K. The importance of demand-side analysis [J].
The Appraisal Journal,1999,67:136-142
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Morgan E V. Value.
Encyclopedia Britannica. vol.22,1973
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Arrow K J. Social Choice and Individual Value [M].
Social Choice and Individual Value,1951
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Kelman S. an ethical critique[J].
Regulation,1981(5):74-82
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问