帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

自然资源福利计量的参数模型与表征尺度: 理论与应用比较
Study on the Parametric Models and Measures in Welfare Estimation of Natural Resources: Comparison of Theory and application

查看参考文献30篇

赵军   杨凯  
文摘 对自然资源产生的社会福利进行货币化计量是目前资源与环境经济学研究的焦点之一,条件估值法(CVM)在评估自然资源福利的研究方面具有独特的优势.1984年提出的基于线性效用差下福利计量的参数模型及相应的表征尺度在后来的CVM研究中得到了较多的应用,但已有研究多侧重于方法的应用,对模型和尺度的理论有效性缺乏实证性的探讨.基于随机效用最大化原理对消费者偏好函数模型及相应的福利计量尺度进行了较为详细的数学推导(以Logit模型为例).以上海某城市河流资源CVM福利计量为例,在实证分析过程中结合国外已有研究,将线性模型与基于非线性效用差下的对数模型进行了比较,给出了在CVM研究中对自然资源进行福利计量建议采用的参数模型与表征尺度.
其他语种文摘 Estimating the social welfare produced by natural resources is one of the focuses in the field of resources and environmental economics.Contingent valuation method (CVM) is one of the most dominating techniques for the estimation.Although the parametric model based upon linear utility difference was preferred in the subsequent studies since 1984 when Hanemnn incorporated logit model into CVM,yet with the fast development of computer software,the problem is advanced that whether the logit model can well fit the natural resources demand curve and whether it is appropriate for the welfare measures used in the previous studies need to be clarified.We firstly deduced in details the parametric models and the corresponding welfare measures supported by the theory of random utility maximization.then in a case study the fitnessof-good comparison between linear models and loglinear models based upon ad hoc utility difference was made.It is showed in this paper that:(l)Linear models such as logit advanced by Hanemann can well fit the Willingness-to-pay (WTP) curve and measure the welfare change oi nalural resources,and the zero WTP can be adjusted by Spike model in linear models.Although there is no significant difference in the results such as mean WTP between linear and log-linear models,yet this can not cover the possible truth that the significance level of linear models may be obviously lower than the log-linear ones. (2)Log-models based upon non-linear utility difference can especially in the tails fit the WTP curve very well,which may be more appropriate for the description of the natural resources demand curve but not private goods.There is no significant difference between log-logit and log-probit models. (3)Median WTP is sensitive to the distribution assumption of consumer preference,and there exists difficulty in measuring the total social welfare because of the definition of the median.We suggest that the mean WTP calculated under log-logit model should be used to measure the welfare change of natural resources in contingent valuation method,which can be got by numerical integration in the interval of from zero to the maximum bid amount. (4)Log-linear models effectively excluded the negative WTP and make the models more powerful for the valuation program for resources protection or improvement project,but log-models can not consider the zero WTP while the linear-models can, and log-models will bring obvious fat tail effect in the calculation of mean WTP,so more discussion and improvement are needed for the above flaws of log-models.
来源 自然资源学报 ,2004,19(6):795-803 【核心库】
关键词 自然资源 ; 福利计量 ; 条件估值法 ; 参数模型 ; 支付意愿 ; 拟合优度
地址

华东师范大学,资源与环境科学学院教育部, 教育部地理信息科学重点实验室, 上海, 200062

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1000-3037
学科 普通生物学
基金 国家教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金 ;  上海市重点学科建设项目 ;  国家教育部211工程 ;  上海市青年科技启明星计划
文献收藏号 CSCD:1646140

参考文献 共 30 共2页

1.  Davis R K. Recreation planning as an economic problem[J]. Natural Resource Journal,1963(3):239-249 被引 3    
2.  Hanemann W M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1984,66(3):332-341 被引 60    
3.  Loomis J B. An economic approach[J]. Water Resource Reseorch,1987,23:1449-1556 被引 1    
4.  Loomis J. results from a contingent valuation survey[J]. Ecological Economics,2000,33:103-117 被引 128    
5.  Kenyon W. a case study in the Ettrick Valley[J]. Forestry Policy and Economics,2001(3):69-80 被引 1    
6.  MacDonald H F. Proposed methodology for measuring incremental environmental benefits from using constructed wetlands to control agricultural non-point-source pollution [J]. Journal of Environmental Maragement,1998,54(4):259-267 被引 2    
7.  Costanza R. putting the issues in perspective[J]. Ecological Economics,1998,25(1):67-72 被引 352    
8.  Duffield J W. Inference and optimal design for welfare measure in dichotomous choice contingent valuation[J]. Land Economics,1991,67(2):225-239 被引 3    
9.  Cooper J C. Flexible functional form estimation of willingness to pay using dichotomous choice data [J]. Journal of Environmental Management and Economics,2002,43:267-279 被引 1    
10.  Chen H Z. Semi-nonparametric estimation of binary response models with an application to natural resource valuation[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1997,76:323-340 被引 1    
11.  徐中民. 额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估. 地理学报,2002,57(1):107-116 被引 77    
12.  徐中民. 额济纲旗生态系统服务恢复价值评估方法的比较与应用. 生态学报,2003,23(9):1841-1850 被引 50    
13.  张志强. 黑河流域张掖市生态系统服务恢复的价值评估研究[J]. 自然资源学报,2004,19(2):320-329 被引 11    
14.  赵军. 上海城市内河生态系统服务的条件价值评估[J]. 环境科学研究,2004,17(2):57-60 被引 3    
15.  Hanemann W M. Reply[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1989,71(4):1057-1061 被引 14    
16.  马中. 环境与自然资源经济学概论[M]. 环境与自然资源经济学概论,1999:122-131 被引 4    
17.  曾贤刚(译). 环境与资源价值评估--理论与方法[M]. 环境与资源价值评估--理论与方法,1993:52-68 被引 1    
18.  Bishop R C. Are indirect methods biased?[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1981,66(3):926-930 被引 13    
19.  Mitchell R C. the Contingent Valuation Method [M]. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods:the Contingent Valuation Method,1989 被引 21    
20.  Hanemann W M. Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand[J]. Econometrica,1984,52:541-562 被引 11    
引证文献 8

1 陈琳 条件价值评估法在非市场价值评估中的应用 生态学报,2006,26(2):610-619
被引 39

2 赵军 自然资源与环境价值评估:条件估值法及应用原则探讨 自然资源学报,2006,21(5):834-843
被引 18

显示所有8篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号