管理自我效能感与一般自我效能感的关系
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGERIAL SELF-EFFICACY AND GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY
查看参考文献18篇
|
文摘
|
以管理者自我效能感这个具体自我效能感为研究对象,探讨具体自我效能感与一般自我效能感的关系.结果发现:⑴管理自我效能感和一般自我效能感都对管理者工作绩效有显著影响,但前者的影响效果更为明显;⑵管理自我效能感对管理者工作态度有显著影响,但一般自我效能感的影响效果不显著;⑶一般自我效能感主要通过管理自我效能感,对管理者工作态度和工作绩效产生间接影响.这就证明了:⑴自我效能感可以分为两个操作层次,即一般和具体,且前者主要通过后者产生间接作用;⑵要提高自我效能感的预测效果,须针对具体自我效能感进行研究. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Self-efficacy, as presented in Bandura's social learning and social cognition theories is a construct, which refers mainly to beliefs about specific behaviors in specific situations (specific self-efficacy, SSE). Some researchers have expanded the construct to include a more trait-like variable dubbed general self-efficacy (GSE). Focused on managerial self-efficacy (MSE) , the relationship between SSE and GSE was explored by in this research. The re-sults showed that: (l)both MSE and GSE were important variables to predict managers'job performance, but GSS didn't predict well job performance as MSE; (2)MSE has significant correlations with work-related attitudes, but no relationships were found between GSE and work-related attitudes; (3)MSE mediates the relationships between GSE and job performance) and relationships between GSE and work-related attitudes. The above findings support that self-efficacy may be conceptualized as both a state(SSE) and a trait(GSE) , but SSE should be given a priority if the objective is to explain the motivational dynamics leading to performance in a specific situation or on a highly specific task. |
|
来源
|
心理学报
,2004,36(5):586-592 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
管理者
;
管理自我效能感
;
一般自我效能感
|
|
地址
|
1.
北京大学心理系, 北京, 100871
2.
暨南大学人力资源管理研究所, 广州, 510632
3.
中国科学院心理所, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
0439-755X |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金资助项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:1645448
|
参考文献 共
18
共1页
|
|
1.
Bandura A. A social-cognitive view.
Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive view,1986
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Bandura A. The exercise of control.
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control,1997
|
被引
76
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Sherer M. Prentice-Dunn.
Psychological Reports,1982,51:663-671
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Chen G. Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2000,85(6):835-847
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Schwarzer R. Comparison of the German.
Applied Psychology:An International Review,1997,46(1):69-88
|
被引
34
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Judge T A. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits-self-esteem.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86(1):80-92
|
被引
52
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Woodruff S L. Task.
Psychological Reports,1993,72(2):423-432
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
陆昌勤. 管理者的管理自我效能感.
心理科学进展(前心理学动态),2001,9(2):179-185
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
陆昌勤. 组织行为学中自我效能感研究的历史、现状与思考.
心理科学,2002,25(3):345-346
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Stajkovic A D. A meta-analysis.
Psychological Bulletin,1998,124(2):240-261
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Bandura A. Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1991,60:941-951
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
许志超. “华人工作相关人格量表”的编制、意义与效度.
心理学报,2000,32(4):443-452
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Dension D R. Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership.
Organizational Science,1995,6(5):524-540
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
凌文辁. 影响组织承诺的因素探讨.
心理学报,2001,33(3):259-263
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Siu O L. A comparative study.
Journal of Managerial Psychology,1999,14(1):6-25
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Podsakofff P M. A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88(5):879-903
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Kelloway E K. A researcher's guide.
Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide,1998
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Anderson J C. A review and recommended two-step approach.
Psychological Bulletin,1988,103:411-423
|
被引
229
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问