帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

Knowing that You Know and Knowing that You don't Know:A Fmri Study on Feeling-of-Knowing(FOK)
"知道自己知道"与"知道自己不知道"--一项有关知道感(FOK)的脑成像研究

查看参考文献25篇

文摘 Neural correlates of feeling-of-knowing (FOK) were investigated by event-related fMRI and unrelated word-pairs in a standard Recall-Judgment-Recognition (RJR) procedure. According to performance in post-scan criterion test, FOK trials were categorized as "PP" (positive-FOK, positive/"hits"-recognition), "NN" (negativeFOK, negative/" misses"-recognition), "NP" (negative-FOK, negative-recognition), and "PN" (positive-FOK,negative-recognition). Contrasts between accurate FOK predictions (PP, NN) and inaccurate ones (NP, PN) revealed no difference. Further analysis indicated PP and NN were different; combining them together might conceal differences. Specifically, PP was associated with left prefrontal activities in BA 8 or BA 47 relative to NN or NP respectively. This observation queried the conventional view that regarded PP and NN as the same kind of "accurate FOK predictions", and called for dissociations between feeling-of-knowing (PP) and feeling-of-not-knowing (NN).
其他语种文摘 采用事件相关功能性磁共振成像技术(event-related fMRI)以及在FOK(feeling-of-knowing)研究中常用的"线索回忆-FOK判断-再认测验"(Recall-Judgment-Recognition,RJR)程序,以汉字词对为识记材料,研究了FOK判断中的大脑活动区域.根据FOK判断的正负以及其后的再认测验的对错,实验将FOK判断的项目分为四类:PP项目(正性FOK判断,正确再认),NN(负性FOK判断,错误再认),NP(负性FOK判断,正确再认)以及PN(正性FOK判断,错误再认).脑成像的分析结果显示:准确的FOK预测(即PP与NN项目)与不准确的FOK预测(即NP与NP项目)在脑活动上没有显著的差异.而进一步分析表明,这种"无差异"的现象可能是由于PP项目与NN项目激活了不同的脑活动模式所造成的.具体地讲,相对于NN项目而言,PP项目伴随有明显的左侧前额叶(BA 8区)的活动.这一观察提示我们:知道感(PP)与不知道感(NN)可能是由不同的脑神经网络所支持、并通过不同的认知过程来实现的.
来源 心理学报 ,2004,36(4):426-433 【核心库】
关键词 feeling-of-knowing ; event-related fMRI ; metamemory
地址

1. 中科院心理所, Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 北京, 100101  

2. Neuroscience Research Institute, AIST, 日本  

3. University of Tsukuba, 日本

语种 英文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金 ;  中国科学院项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:1597870

参考文献 共 25 共2页

1.  Hart J T. Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology,1965,56:208-216 被引 14    
2.  Nelson T O. Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning. Journal of Experimental psychology: General,1984,113:282-300 被引 6    
3.  Schacter D L. Feeling of knowing in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,1983,12:452-460 被引 1    
4.  Metcalfe J. Novelty monitoring. Psychological Review,1993,100:3-22 被引 5    
5.  Shimamura A. A study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,1986,12:452-460 被引 3    
6.  Souchay C. Aging. Neuropsychology,2000,14:299-309 被引 2    
7.  Prevey M L. monitoring knowledge inaccessible to conscious recall. Cortex,1991,27:81-92 被引 3    
8.  Prevey M L. self-monitoring of memory functions. Brain and Cognition,1988,7:298-311 被引 4    
9.  Maril A. an event-related fMRI study of semantic retrieval failure and cognitive conflict. Neuron,2001,31:653-660 被引 4    
10.  Nolde S F. The role of prefrontal during test of episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1998,2:399-406 被引 9    
11.  Thompson-Schill S L. a reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1997,94:14792-14797 被引 9    
12.  Fletcher P C. Shallice T. Brain,1996,119:1587-1596 被引 3    
13.  Rugg M D. evidence from brain potentials and positron emission tomography. Experimental Brain Research,1998,123:18-23 被引 6    
14.  McDermott K B. An Event-Related fMRI Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2000,12:965-976 被引 1    
15.  Ranganath C. Left anterior prefrontal activation increases with demands to recall specific perceptual information. The Journal of Neuroscience,2000,20:1-5 被引 3    
16.  Andreasen N C. Ⅱ. NeuroImage,1995,2:296-305 被引 1    
17.  Buckner R L. Dissociation of human prefrontal cortical areas across different speech production tasks and gender groups. Journal of Neurophysiololgy,1995,74:2163-2173 被引 3    
18.  Fujii T. a PET study. NeuroReport,1997,8:1113-1117 被引 1    
19.  Tulving E. Novelty and familiarity activations in PET studies of memory encoding and retrieval. Cerebral Cortex,1996,6:71-79 被引 3    
20.  Cabeza R. An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal Cognitive Neuroscience,2000,12:1-47 被引 64    
引证文献 4

1 刘岩 知道感与不知道感:两种不同的认知加工过程--一项来自行为实验的证据 心理学报,2005,37(5):590-597
被引 2

2 王培培 知道感(FOK)和不知道感(FOnK)的双向实验分离 心理学报,2006,38(5):702-708
被引 0 次

显示所有4篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号