帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

不同粗饲料组合对肉牛生长性能、营养物质表观消化、瘤胃发酵参数及微生物区系的影响
Effects of Different Roughage Combinations on Growth Performance, Nutrient Apparent Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Microflora of Beef Cattle

查看参考文献63篇

王金宇 1,2   陈群 2 *   蔡鑫毓 1,2   邱玉朗 2   李林 2  
文摘 本试验旨在研究不同粗饲料组合对肉牛生长性能、营养物质表观消化、瘤胃发酵参数及微生物区系的影响。选择18头体重为(517±9) kg的健康西门塔尔杂交牛,随机分为3组,每组6个重复,每个重复1头牛。3组分别饲喂50.0%玉米秸秆+50.0%精料( A组) 、16.7%羊草+ 33.3%玉米秸秆青贮+50.0%精料( B组) 、16.7%玉米秸秆+33.3%玉米秸秆青贮+50.0%精料( C组)的试验饲粮。预试期15 d,正试期90 d。结果表明:1) B组的平均日增重( ADG)显著高于A、C组( P < 0.05),C组的ADG显著高于A组( P < 0.05) 。B组的料重比显著低于A组( P < 0.05) 。2) B组的干物质( DM)表观消化率显著高于A组( P < 0.05), B组的酸性洗涤纤维( ADF)表观消化率显著高于A、C组( P<0.05) 。3) B、C组的瘤胃液氨态氮( NH_3 -N)含量显著低于A组( P<0.05) 。B组的瘤胃液乙酸、丙酸、丁酸、异丁酸、戊酸和总挥发性脂肪酸含量显著高于A、C组( P<0.05),且C组的瘤胃液丁酸含量显著低于A组( P<0.05) 。4) C组的Simpson指数显著低于B组( P<0.05) 。B组的瘤胃普雷沃氏菌科UCG-003( Prevotellaceae_UCG-003)相对丰度显著高于A组( P<0.05),A、B组的拟杆菌目RF16群( Bacteroidales_RF16_group)相对丰度显著高于C组( P<0.05),C组的瘤胃WCHB1-41相对丰度显著高于A、B组( P<0.05) 。由此可见,16.7%羊草+33.3%玉米秸秆青贮的粗饲料组合可提高肉牛DM和ADF表观消化率、部分挥发性脂肪酸含量和瘤胃中增加纤维分解菌活性有益菌的相对丰度,提高肉牛生长性能。
其他语种文摘 This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different roughage combinations on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibility, rumen fermentation parameters and microflora of beef cattle. Eighteen healthy Simmental crossbred cattle with body weight of (517±9) kg were randomly divided into 3 groups with 6 replicates per group and 1 cattle per replicate. The 3 groups were fed experimental diets which contained 50.0% corn straw+50.0% concentrate (group A), 16.7% Leymus chinensis+33.3% corn straw silage+ 50.0% concentrate (group B) and 16.7% corn straw + 33.3% corn straw silage + 50.0% concentrate (group C), respectively. The preparing experiment for 15 days, and the experiment lasted for 90 days. The results showed as follows: 1) the average daily gain (ADG) of group B was significantly higher than that of groups A and C (P<0.05), and the ADG of group C was significantly higher than that of group A (P<0.05). The feed to gain ratio of group B was significantly lower than that of group A (P<0.05). 2) The dry matter (DM) apparent digestibility of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P<0.05), and the acid detergent fiber (ADF) of group B was significantly higher than that of groups A and C (P<0.05). 3) The rumen fluid ammonia nitrogen (NH_3 -N) content of groups B and C was significantly lower than that of group A (P<0.05). The contents of acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, isobutyric acid, valeric acid and total volatile fatty acid in rumen fluid of group B were significantly higher than those of groups A and C (P<0.05), and the rumen fluid butyric acid content of group C was significantly lower than that of group A (P<0.05). 4) The Simpson index of group C was significantly lower than that of group B (P<0.05). The rumen Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 relative abundance of group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P<0.05), the rumen Bacteroidales_RF16_group relative abundance of groups A and B was significantly higher than that of group C (P<0.05), and the rumen WCHB1-41 relative abundance of group C was significantly higher than that of groups A and B (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the 16.7% Leymus chinensis + 33.3% corn straw silage roughage combination can improve the DM and ADF apparent digestibility, partial volatile fatty acid contents and the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria with increased cellulolytic bacteria activity of beef cattle, and improve the growth performance of beef cattle.
来源 动物营养学报 ,2024,36(10):6432-6447 【核心库】
DOI 10.12418/CJAN2024.547
关键词 玉米秸秆青贮 ; 生长性能 ; 营养物质表观消化率 ; 瘤胃发酵参数 ; 瘤胃微生物区系
地址

1. 吉林农业大学动物科学技术学院, 长春, 130118  

2. 吉林省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所, 公主岭, 136100

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1006-267X
学科 畜牧、动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂
基金 吉林省创新工程项目 ;  吉林省重大专项项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:7838594

参考文献 共 63 共4页

1.  Barriere Y. Brown-midrib genes in maize and their efficiency in dairy cow feeding.Perspectives for breeding improved silage maize targeting gene modifications in the monolignol and p-hydroxycinnamate pathways. Maydica,2017,62(2):1-19 CSCD被引 1    
2.  Chibisa G E. Effects of feeding corn silage from short-season hybrids and extending the backgrounding period on production performance and carcass traits of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science,2018,96(6):2490-2503 CSCD被引 1    
3.  Tian J P. Effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculants and cellulase on fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of Leymus chinensis silage. Grassland Science,2014,60(4):199-205 CSCD被引 7    
4.  Brito A F. Effect of varying dietary ratios of alfalfa silage to corn silage on production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science,2006,89(10):3924-3938 CSCD被引 7    
5.  Hassanat F. Replacing alfalfa silage with corn silage in dairy cow diets: effects on enteric methane production,ruminal fermentation,digestion,N balance,and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science,2013,96(7):4553-4567 CSCD被引 13    
6.  Yan R. Short communication:effects of replacing part of corn silage and alfalfa hay with Leymus chinensis hay on milk production and composition. Journal of Dairy Science,2011,94(7):3605-3608 CSCD被引 4    
7.  Zebeli Q. Invited review:role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95(3):1041-1056 CSCD被引 13    
8.  Zebeli Q. A model to optimise the requirements of lactating dairy cows for physically effective neutral detergent fibre. Archives of Animal Nutrition,2010,64(4):265-278 CSCD被引 4    
9.  刘公社. 羊草种质资源的评价与利用. 科学通报,2016,61(2):271-281 CSCD被引 39    
10.  闫玉春. 典型草原群落不同围封时间下植被、土壤差异研究. 干旱区资源与环境,2008(2):145-151 CSCD被引 23    
11.  Bernard J K. Effect of replacing corn silage with annual ryegrass silage on nutrient digestibility,intake,and milk yield for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science,2002,85(9):2277-2282 CSCD被引 3    
12.  张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. (4版),2016 CSCD被引 47    
13.  Zhong R Z. Effects of substitution of different levels of steam-flaked corn for finely ground corn on lactation and digestion in early lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science,2008,91(10):3931-3937 CSCD被引 17    
14.  Cooper S D B. The effect of late pregnancy on the diet selections made by ewes. Livestock Production Science,1994,40(3):263-275 CSCD被引 2    
15.  Owen S N. Foraging responses of kudus to seasonal changes in food resources:elasticity in constraints. Ecology,1994,75(4):1050-1062 CSCD被引 1    
16.  Molle G. Responses to condensed tannins of flowering Sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) grazed by dairy sheep part 1:effects on feeding behaviour,intake,diet digestibility and performance. Livestock Science,2009,123(2/3):138-146 CSCD被引 2    
17.  Villalba J J. Understanding and manipulating diet choice in grazing animals. Animal Production Science,2015,55(3):261-271 CSCD被引 2    
18.  Adler L S. Size-mediated performance of a generalist herbivore feeding on mixed diets. Southwestern Naturalist,2004,49(2):189-196 CSCD被引 1    
19.  Freeland W J. Strategies in herbivory by mammals:the role of plant secondary compounds. The American Naturalist,1974,108(961):269-289 CSCD被引 24    
20.  Provenza F D. Implications of linking herbivore experience,varied diets,and plant biochemical diversity for pastures. ASA-CSSA-SSSA International Annual Meetings,2005:254-1 CSCD被引 1    
引证文献 1

1 孙宇 中草药调控反刍动物瘤胃菌群代谢的研究进展 动物营养学报,2025,37(2):771-777
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号