碳排放权交易对企业违约风险的影响及作用机制
The impact and mechanism of carbon emission trading on corporate default risk
查看参考文献81篇
|
文摘
|
近年来国内外各种不确定因素增多,企业债务问题频出,违约风险不容忽视.在低碳绿色发展背景下,碳排放权交易政策是我国实现"双碳"目标的重要环境规制,在激励企业碳减排的同时,是否对企业违约风险产生影响?本文基于我国碳排放权交易试点的准自然实验,使用2010-2020年试点地区上市公司数据,通过双重差分法、三重差分法研究碳交易政策对企业违约风险的影响.研究发现,碳交易政策显著降低了试点企业特别是高污染企业的违约风险.在进行一系列稳健性检验后,结论仍然成立.机制研究表明,碳交易政策可以通过促进绿色创新、加强环境信息披露和缓解融资约束三条路径降低违约风险.异质性分析表明,试点政策在地方政府环境治理力度较强以及公众环境关注程度较高的地区,对企业违约风险的缓解作用更显著.本文拓宽了环境风险与违约风险关系的相关研究,丰富了碳金融市场微观层面效果的经验证据,同时也为企业绿色转型中的金融风险防控提供了有益启示. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
In recent years, with the increase of various uncertainties at home and abroad, corporate debt problems occur frequently and the risk of default cannot be ignored. Under the background of low-carbon and green development, the carbon emission trading (CET) system is an important environmental regulation set up in China for realizing carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. While encouraging corporates to reduce carbon emissions, does it affect their default risk? Based on a quasi-natural experiment of China's CET system, using the data of listed companies in the pilot area from 2010 to 2020, this paper studies the impact of CET on corporate default risk through the difference-in-differences model (DID) and difference-indifference- in-differences model (DDD). This research finds that CET significantly reduces the default risk of the pilot corporates, especially high-polluting corporates. After a series of robustness tests, the conclusion is still valid. Mechanism research shows that CET reduces the default risk by increasing green innovation, strengthening environmental information disclosure and easing financing constraints. Heterogeneity analysis shows that pilot policies have a more significant mitigation effect on enterprise default risk in areas where local environmental governance is stronger and public environmental concern is higher. This paper broadens the research on the relationship between environmental risk and default risk, enriches the empirical evidence on the effect of the carbon finance market at the micro level, and also provides beneficial enlightenment for the prevention and control of financial risks in the green transformation of enterprises. |
|
来源
|
系统工程理论与实践
,2024,44(8):2475-2492 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.12011/SETP2023-0992
|
|
关键词
|
碳排放权交易
;
违约风险
;
绿色创新
;
环境信息披露
;
融资约束
|
|
地址
|
山东师范大学商学院, 济南, 250014
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-6788 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
山东省自然科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7790565
|
参考文献 共
81
共5页
|
|
1.
汪明月. 碳交易政策下低碳技术异地协同共享策略及减排收益研究.
系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(6):1419-1434
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
任亚运. 碳交易的减排及绿色发展效应研究.
中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(5):11-20
|
CSCD被引
34
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
张国兴. 碳交易政策的协同减排效应.
中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(3):1-10
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Zhang W. Does carbon emissions trading promote green technology innovation in China?.
Applied Energy,2022,315:119012
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
胡珺. 市场激励型环境规制可以推动企业技术创新吗?——基于中国碳排放权交易机制的自然实验.
金融研究,2020(1):171-189
|
CSCD被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
何彦妮. 碳交易市场对企业创新策略的影响及作用机制.
中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(7):37-48
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Zhu J. Low-carbon innovation induced by emissions trading in China.
Nature Communications,2019,10(1):1-8
|
CSCD被引
52
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
范丹. 碳排放权交易如何影响企业全要素生产率?.
系统工程理论与实践,2022,42(3):591-603
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Chen W. Carbon emissions trading system and investment efficiency: Evidence from China.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2022,358:131782
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
曹翔. 不同碳减排政策对内外资企业竞争力的影响比较.
中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(6):10-15
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
沈洪涛. 碳排放权交易机制能提高企业价值吗.
财贸经济,2019,40(1):144-161
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Tang Q. Carbon management systems and carbon mitigation.
Australian Accounting Review,2014,24(1):84-98
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Bauer R. Corporate environmental management and credit risk.
SSRN 1660470,2010
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Sharfman M P. Environmental risk management and the cost of capital.
Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(6):569-592
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Porter M E. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship.
Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(4):97-118
|
CSCD被引
361
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
De Villiers C. Where firms choose to disclose voluntary environmental information.
Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,2011,30(6):504-525
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
He G. Research on the impact of environment, society, and governance (ESG) on firm risk: An explanation from a financing constraints perspective.
Finance Research Letters,2023:104038
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Safiullah M. Do all institutional investors care about corporate carbon emissions?.
Energy Economics,2022,115:106376
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Kabir M N. Carbon emissions and default risk: International evidence from firm-level data.
Economic Modelling,2021,103:105617
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Gutierrez-Lopez C. How can firms' transition to a low-carbon economy affect the distance to default?.
Research in International Business and Finance,2022,62:101722
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问