亲社会风险行为及其理论模型与神经机制
Theoretical models and neural mechanisms of prosocial risky behavior
查看参考文献114篇
|
文摘
|
亲社会风险行为(prosocial risky behavior)是指为了他人利益或社会福利做出的冒险行为.因兼具亲社会性和风险性,且经常与消极的风险行为交替发生,亲社会风险行为在日常生活中难以被识别,但在一定程度上表现出了人类积极健康发展的特点.在明确亲社会风险行为概念的来源、界定及其测量方法的基础上,本文借鉴了亲社会行为和风险行为的解释路径,从风险偏好和社会偏好整合加工的视角对人类亲社会风险行为的前因研究成果进行了归纳,进而构建了一个新颖的亲社会风险行为理论模型,并系统阐述了其大脑神经基础和时间加工进程特点.未来的研究应进一步明确亲社会风险行为的心理结构,优化其研究范式,比较经济与社会决策领域下框架效应的特点及其认知神经机制,并探索不同方面的因素对亲社会风险行为的影响作用. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The risk-taking tendency in human decision-making is not entirely negative. It can be positive and pro-social when the purpose is beneficial to others or society. Recently, several scholars have investigated and compared the internal mechanisms of the generation and development of individual negative risk and positive prosocial behaviors using research methods from developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. They found overlapping neural circuits, thus, they proposed the concept of prosocial risky behavior. This term refers to the dual positive nature of individual risk-taking and prosocial tendencies in a given behavior. It provides a theoretical premise for the tendency of harmful human behavior to shift in a positive direction. Prosocial risky behavior is risk-taking for the benefit of others or for general social welfare. It is dangerous yet prosocial. Thus, it often alternates with risky negative behavior. Prosocial risky behavior is difficult to identify in everyday life. However, to some extent it shows the hallmarks of positive, healthy human development. For prosocial risky behavior, the current research is scattered, lacking systematic classification. Previous studies have interpreted only its mechanisms and neural basis regarding risk or social preference. Some previous studies have regarded prosocial risky behavior as simple prosocial behavior, focusing primarily on the influence of risk factors (risk preferences). Other researchers regarded prosocial risky behavior as simple risk-taking behavior, mainly focusing on prosocial motivation’s influence (social preferences). Less so, with this concern, but special social behavior. This study’s objective is to examine the concept of prosocial risky behavior, including its definition and measurement. It aims to achieve an integrated view of prosocial behavior and risk behavior, and clarify their connection from the perspective of risk and social preferences in the evolution of prosocial risky behavior. A novel theoretical model of prosocial risky behavior is constructed. Furthermore, the study provides a detailed explanation of the neural basis and temporal processing characteristics of prosocial risky behavior. Future research should clarify the psychological structure of prosocial risky behavior, optimize its paradigm, and compare framing effect features and their cognitive neural mechanisms, specifically with reference to economics and social decision-making. In addition, future research should explore the characteristics and developmental rules of prosocial risky behavior across the lifespan related to: Decision-makers, decision-making objects, and decision situations. This effort could deepen our understanding of its characteristics and mechanisms and reveal how the framing effect works in prosocial risky behavior. In addition, it should clarify its potential neural mechanisms providing a practical and reliable empirical basis for verifying a theoretical model of prosocial risky behavior. Simultaneously, it has important, instructive theoretical implications for the stimulation of prosocial risky behavior and the promotion of individual performance. |
|
来源
|
科学通报
,2023,68(2/3):154-168 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.1360/TB-2022-0699
|
|
关键词
|
亲社会风险行为
;
风险偏好
;
社会偏好
;
理论模型
;
神经机制
|
|
地址
|
1.
湖南科技大学教育学院心理学系, 湘潭, 411201
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101
3.
湖南第一师范学院心理健康教育中心, 长沙, 410205
4.
中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
综述型 |
|
ISSN
|
0023-074X |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
湖南省自然科学基金
;
湖南省教育科学规划基金
;
湖南省研究生科研创新项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7407848
|
参考文献 共
114
共6页
|
|
1.
Kathy T. But is helping you worth the risk? Defining prosocial risk taking in adolescence.
Dev Cogn Neuros-neth,2017,25:260-271
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Telzer E H. Dopaminergic reward sensitivity can promote adolescent health: A new perspective on the mechanism of ventral striatum activation.
Dev Cogn Neuros-neth,2016,17:57-67
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
窦凯. 青少年亲社会冒险行为量表的修订及信效度检验.
中国健康心理学杂志,2020,10:1538-1541
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Skaar N R. Measuring adolescent prosocial and health risk behavior in schools: Initial development of a screening measure.
School Mental Health,2014,6:137-149
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Zanon M. Brain activity and prosocial behavior in a simulated life-threatening situation.
NeuroImage,2014,98:134-146
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Corbett B. Interpersonal regret and prosocial risk taking in children.
Cogn Dev,2021,58:101036
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Gross J. When helping is risky: Behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms of prosocial decisions entailing risk.
Neuropsychology,2020,26:1-34
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Campanha C. Responding to unfair offers made by a friend: Neuroelectrical activity changes in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex.
J Neurosci,2011,31:15569-15574
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Gu R. Pain and social decision-making: New insights from the social framing effect.
Brain Sci Adv,2019,5:221-238
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Liu J. The neural mechanism of the social framing effect: Evidence from fMRI and tDCS studies.
J Neurosci,2020,40:3646-3656
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
崔芳. 右侧颞顶联合区及道德加工脑网络的功能连接预测社会性框架效应:来自静息态功能磁共振的证据.
心理学报,2021,53:55-66
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Van Vugt M. Competitive Altruism: Development of Reputation-based Cooperation in Groups.
Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology,2007
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Chiang Y S. Self-interested partner selection can lead to the emergence of fairness.
Evol Hum Behav,2010,4:265-270
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Van Vugt M. Men behaving nicely: Public goods as peacock tails.
Br J Psychol,2013,104:3-13
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Crockett M J. Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2014,111:17320-17325
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Leder J. Risky choice in interpersonal context: Do people dare because they care?.
J Econ Psychol,2016,2:1-23
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Brock J M. Dictating the risk: Experimental evidence on giving in risky environments.
Am Econom Rev,2013,103:415-437
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Krawczyk M. 'Give me a chance!' An experiment in social decision under risk.
Exp Econ,2010,13:500-511
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Izuma K. Processing of the incentive for social approval in the ventral striatum during charitable donation.
J Cogn Neurosci,2010,22:621-631
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Fehr E. The nature of human altruism.
Nature,2003,425:785-791
|
CSCD被引
52
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问