基于FAHP法和区间数改进TOPSIS法的盾构隧道下穿建筑物风险评估
Risk Assessment for Shield Tunneling Beneath Buildings Based on Interval Improved TOPSIS Method and FAHP Method
查看参考文献10篇
文摘
|
为评估盾构隧道施工对邻近建筑物的影响,提出一种基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)和区间数改进优劣解距离(TOPSIS)法相结合的风险评估方法.通过调研建立基于土体性质、建筑物因素、隧道因素、盾构掘进参数等影响因素为主的风险评估体系,基于专家打分利用FAHP判断因素权重.利用传统TOPSIS法,根据因素分级标准选取6个典型样本,确定非等分风险等级判断标准.首次将区间数改进TOPSIS法运用到盾构隧道下穿建筑物的风险评估中,采用区间数描述工程情况.该评估过程均采用量化方式,比传统风险评估方法的准确性更高,受主观因素影响较少,客观性更强.利用该方法对某砌体建筑物进行风险评估,结果与实际情况相符,证明了该方法的有效性,可为类似工程风险评估提供参考. |
其他语种文摘
|
In order to evaluate the impact of shield tunnel construction on adjacent buildings, a method based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and the interval number improvement technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is proposed. A risk assessment system based on soil properties, building factors, tunnel factors, shield tunneling parameters, and other factors is established after investigation. The FAHP is used to determine the weight of factors based on expert scoring. Based on the traditional TOPSIS method, 6 typical samples are selected according to the factor grading standard to determine the non-uniform risk rating criteria. For the first time, the interval improved TOPSIS method is applied to the risk assessment of shield tunneling beneath buildings. The engineering situation can be better represented by the interval number. Compared with traditional risk assessment methods, this method is more accurate, less affected by subjective factors, and more objective. The proposed method has been used to evaluate the risk of a certain masonry building, and the result is consistent with the actual situation, which proves its effectiveness of. Thus, the proposed method can provide reference for risk assessment of similar projects. |
来源
|
上海交通大学学报
,2022,56(12):1710-1719 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2021.018
|
关键词
|
盾构隧道
;
模糊层次分析法
;
TOPSIS法
;
风险评估
|
地址
|
湖南大学地下空间开发先进技术研究中心;土木工程学院, 建筑安全与节能教育部重点实验室, 长沙, 410082
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1006-2467 |
学科
|
建筑科学 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金重点项目
;
湖南省创新平台与人才计划-湖湘高层次人才聚集工程-创新团队项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7364937
|
参考文献 共
10
共1页
|
1.
Clarke J A. Evaluation of risk assessment procedures for buildings adjacent to tunnelling works.
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2014,40:333-342
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
2.
于丹丹. 地铁隧道施工邻近建筑物安全风险评价.
城市轨道交通研究,2013,16(4):32-37
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
3.
魏纲. 邻近盾构隧道的建筑物安全风险模糊层次分析.
地下空间与工程学报,2014,10(4):956-961
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
4.
王烨晟. 受地铁工程影响建筑物安全风险等级评定研究.
路基工程,2015(3):42-46
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
彭道刚. 基于D-AHP和TOPSIS的火电厂控制系统信息安全风险评估.
控制与决策,2019,34(11):2445-2451
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Taylan O. Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies.
Applied Soft Computing,2014,17:105-116
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Zhang L M. Decision support analysis for safety control in complex project environments based on Bayesian networks.
Expert Systems With Applications,2013,40(11):4273-4282
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Zhang L M. An improved Dempster-Shafer approach to construction safety risk perception.
Knowledge-Based Systems,2017,132:30-46
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
9.
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.
城市轨道交通地下工程建设风险管理规范: GB 50652-2011,2012
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
10.
陈仁朋. 盾构隧道下穿引起砌体结构建筑沉降损伤实例研究.
岩土工程学报,2020,42(12):2301-2307
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|