帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

主动控制感量表中文版的信效度检验
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Sense of Agency Scale

查看参考文献27篇

张伯明 1,2   黄冠华 1,2   郑爽 1,2   顾晶金 1,2   赵科 1,2 *   傅小兰 1,2  
文摘 目的:检验主动控制感量表(Sense of Agency Scale, SoAS)中文版的信度和效度。方法:通过网络平台施测得到有效问卷1800份,随机分成两个独立样本后分别执行项目分析、探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析、结构效度及信度的分析。结果:根据项目分析的结果删除2道题目,得到一个9题量表。探索性因素分析得到一个两因子结构模型。验证性因素分析的结果表明模型区分度良好,拟合度指标为:χ 2/df =2.54,CFI=0.971,TLI=0.960,RMSEA= 0.041,SRMR=0.036。内部一致性信度系数为0.819,分半信度系数为0.661,重测信度系数为0.713。主动控制感量表与一般自我效能感量表、控制感量表的相关系数分别为0.587、0.696(P <0.01)。结论:中文版主动控制感量表具有良好的信效度,可以作为有效的主动控制感测量工具。
其他语种文摘 Objective: This study aimed to introduce the Sense of Agency Scale (SoAS) as a new measurement for Chinese researchers, and test the reliability and validity of Chinese version. Methods: A sample of 1, 800 participants (904 females; Mean age=33.35,SD =9.52) were recruited via an online network platform and completed the 11-item version of CSoAS. The total sample were randomly divided into two samples for subsequent analyses. Results: Nine items were retained after the item analysis, and two subscales (i.e., SoPA and SoNA) were extracted via the exploratory factor analysis. The two-facet model were also supported by the results of confirmatory factor analysis (χ 2/df =2.54, CFI=0.971, TLI=0.960, RMSEA=0.041, SRMR=0.036). Each of the two factors'AVE value was larger than the correlation coefficient of the two factors (r 2=0.383), CR>0.7. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.819, the split-half reliability was 0.661 and testretest reliability coefficient was 0.713. The score of the sense of agency scale was significantly correlated with self-efficacy (GSES), sense of control(The Sense of Control Scale), and the coefficients were 0.587、0.696(P <0.01)respectively. Conclusion: C-SoAS has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a reliable tool to measure one's sense of agency among Chinese.
来源 中国临床心理学杂志 ,2022,30(6):1344-1347,1352 【核心库】
DOI 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.06.016
关键词 主动控制感 ; 因素分析 ; 信度 ; 效度
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

2. 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1005-3611
学科 基础医学
基金 国家自然科学基金 ;  国家社会科学基金重大项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:7346440

参考文献 共 27 共2页

1.  张淼. 主动控制感的测量及认知神经机制. 心理科学进展,2018,26(10):1787-1793 CSCD被引 8 次    
2.  Villa R. Violation of expectations about movement and goal achievement leads to sense of agency reduction. Experimental Brain Research,2018,7(236):2123-2135 CSCD被引 1 次    
3.  Gallagher S. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2000,4(1):14-21 CSCD被引 19 次    
4.  Bryson L. Managing the work-life roller-coaster: Private stress or public health issue?. Social Science & Medicine,2007,65(6):1142-1153 CSCD被引 2 次    
5.  Ward M M. Sense of control and self-reported health in a population-based sample of older Americans: Assessment of potential confounding by affect, personality, and social support. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine,2012,20(1):140-147 CSCD被引 1 次    
6.  O'Connor D B. Sense of personal control, stress and coping style: A cross-cultural study. Stress and Health,2002,16(4):173-183 CSCD被引 1 次    
7.  Bregman-Hai N. Who wrote that? Automaticity and reduced sense of agency in individuals prone to dissociative absorption. Consciousness and Cognition,2020,78:102861-102875 CSCD被引 1 次    
8.  Christensen J F. I just lost it! Fear and anger reduce the sense of agency: A study using intentional binding. Experimental Brain Research,2019,237(5):1205-1212 CSCD被引 2 次    
9.  Caspar E A. Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Current Biology,2016,26(5):585-592 CSCD被引 8 次    
10.  Haggard P. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience,2002,5(4):382-385 CSCD被引 12 次    
11.  Blakemore S J. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience,1998,1(7):635-640 CSCD被引 3 次    
12.  Blakemore S J. The cerebellum contributes to somatosensory cortical activity during selfproduced tactile stimulation. NeuroImage,1999,10(4):448-459 CSCD被引 5 次    
13.  Farrer C. The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. Cerebral Cortex,2008,18(2):254-261 CSCD被引 4 次    
14.  Synofzik M. Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one's actions. Brain,2010,133(1):262-271 CSCD被引 4 次    
15.  Haggard P. Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews,2017,18(4):197-208 CSCD被引 1 次    
16.  Tapal A. The sense of agency scale: A measure of consciously perceived control over one's mind, body, and the immediate environment. Frontiers in Psychology,2017,8(9):1552-1563 CSCD被引 4 次    
17.  Hurault J C. Measuring the sense of agency: A french adaptation and validation of the sense of agency scale (F-SoAS). Frontiers in Psychology,2020,11(10):584145-584157 CSCD被引 1 次    
18.  王才康. 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究. 应用心理学,2001,1(7):37-40 CSCD被引 301 次    
19.  李静. 不同社会阶层贫富差距归因倾向心理机制探讨. 第十八届全国心理学学术会议摘要集——心理学与社会发展,2015 CSCD被引 1 次    
20.  吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用,2010:159-193 CSCD被引 3 次    
引证文献 2 篇

1 张伯明 新冠疫情风险感知对焦虑的影响:有调节的中介模型 中国临床心理学杂志,2023,31(1):213-217
CSCD被引 2 次

2 陈湘军 感知健康能力与婚姻宽恕在农村老年慢性病患者感知伴侣回应性与主动控制感间的链式中介效应 军事护理,2025,42(3):22-26
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有2篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号