四川省偏远农村婴幼儿看护人的人格特质与其营养包喂服行为的关联性分析
Relationship between Personality Traits and Nutrition Package Feeding Behaviors of Infant Caregivers in Remote Rural Areas of Sichuan Province
查看参考文献39篇
|
文摘
|
目的分析四川省偏远农村地区婴幼儿看护人的人格特质以及营养包喂服行为的现状,并探究两者之间的关系。方法采用多阶段随机整群抽样方法,在四川省偏远农村地区选择6 ~24月龄婴幼儿及其看护人作为研究对象。采用结构式问卷收集婴幼儿及其看护人的基本特征、看护人的营养包喂服行为,运用中国版10项目大五人格量表对看护人外向性、宜人性、尽责性、情绪稳定性、开放性5个维度的人格特质进行评估。运用多因素Logistic回归分析婴幼儿看护人的人格特质与其营养包喂服行为之间的关系。结果共调查895对婴幼儿及其看护人。在看护人人格特质方面,外向性维度的平均分为(9.01 ± 2.64)分、宜人性维度的平均分为(10.60 ± 1.99)分、尽责性维度的平均分为(9.41 ± 2.06)分、情绪稳定性维度的平均分为(9.01 ±2.38)分、开放性维度的平均分为(8.57 ±2.29)分。在看护人营养包喂服行为方面,营养包有效喂服率为53.3% (477/895)。回归分析结果显示,在控制其他因素的前提下,看护人的尽责性人格特质(OR =1.08, 95%CI =1.004 ~1.153, P =0.038)是其有效喂服营养包的保护因素。结论四川省偏远农村地区婴幼儿看护人营养包喂服行为不容乐观,具有高尽责性人格的看护人给其婴幼儿有效喂服营养包的可能性更高。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To analyze the personality traits and nutrition package feeding behaviors of infant caregivers in remote rural areas of Sichuan province and explore the relationship between them. Methods A multi-stage random cluster sampling method was employed to select the infants of 6-24 months old and their caregivers in the remote rural areas of Sichuan province. A structured questionnaire was designed to collect the basic characteristics of infants and their caregivers, as well as the feeding behaviors of the caregivers. The Ten-Item Personality Inventory in China was used to evaluate the caregivers’ personality traits in five dimensions: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness. Multivariate Logistic regression was adopted to analyze the relationship between personality traits and nutrition package feeding behaviors of infant caregivers. Results A total of 895 pairs of infants and their caregivers were investigated. The caregivers showed the average scores of 9.01 ±2.64, 10.60 ±1.99, 9.41 ±2.06, 9.01 ±2.38, and 8.57 ±2.29 in the dimensions of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness, respectively. The effective feeding rate of nutrition package was 53.3% (477/895). The results of regression analysis showed that under the premise of controlling for other factors, the caregiver’s conscientious personality (OR =1.08, 95%CI = 1.004-1.153, P =0.038) was the protective factor for the effective feeding of nutrition package. Conclusion The feeding behavior of infant caregivers in the remote rural areas of Sichuan province remains to be improved, and the caregivers with high conscientious personality are more likely to feed their infants effectively. |
|
来源
|
中国医学科学院学报
,2022,44(5):815-821 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.14608
|
|
关键词
|
四川省偏远农村
;
婴幼儿看护人
;
营养包喂服行为
;
大五人格特质
|
|
地址
|
1.
四川大学华西公共卫生学院/四川大学华西第四医院健康行为与社会医学系, 成都, 610041
2.
四川大学华西公共卫生学院/四川大学华西第四医院流行病与卫生统计学系, 成都, 610041
3.
四川大学公共管理学院社会学系, 成都, 610041
4.
四川大学华西公共卫生学院/四川大学华西第四医院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系, 成都, 610041
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-503X |
|
学科
|
预防医学、卫生学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
四川省科技厅项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7330343
|
参考文献 共
39
共2页
|
|
1.
中华预防医学会儿童保健分会. 婴幼儿喂养与营养指南.
中国妇幼健康研究,2019,30(4):392-417
|
CSCD被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
刘月姣. 《中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告(2020年)》发布.
中国食物与营养,2020,26(12):2
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
聂景春. 中国农村贫困地区婴幼儿贫血现状及影响因素分析.
华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2019,37(3):58-69
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
胡芹. 深圳市6 ~ 36个月婴幼儿服用儿童营养包效果评估.
中国妇幼卫生杂志,2016,7(2):26-29
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
方亮. 安徽省贫困地区6 ~ 24月龄婴幼儿营养状况调查.
中国妇幼保健,2017,32(19):4796-4798
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
国家卫生健康委员会.
关于做好2019年基本公共卫生服务项目工作的通知,2022
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Wu Q. Monitoring and evaluating the adherence to a complementary food supplement (Ying Yang Bao) among young children in rural Qinghai, China: a mixed methods evaluation study.
J Glob Health,2017,7(1):011101
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
王庆志. 基于PRECEDE理论探索陕西南部贫困农村地区婴幼儿看护人营养包喂服依从行为的影响因素.
卫生研究,2018,47(4):599-604
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
李甫云. 甘肃省贫困地区儿童营养改善项目营养包服用影响因素分析.
中国妇幼保健,2019,34(21):4851-4855
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Mccrae R R.
Personality in adulthood,1990:184-200
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Ozer D J. Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes.
Annu Rev Psychol,2006,57(1):401-421
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Roberts B W. The power of personality: the comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes.
Perspect Psychol Sci,2010,2(4):313-345
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
陈少华.
人格心理学,2010:80-87
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Hampson S E. Mechanisms by which childhood personality traits influence adult well-being.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci,2010,17(4):264-268
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Smith T W. Personality as risk and resilience in physical Health.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci,2006,15(5):227-231
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Allen M S. Linking Big Five personality traits to sexuality and sexual health: a meta-analytic review.
Psychol Bull,2018,144(10):1081-1110
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Keller C. Does personality influence eating styles and food choices? Direct and indirect effects.
Appetite,2015,84:128-138
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Kircaburun K. Instagram addiction and the Big Five of personality: the mediating role of self-liking.
J Behav Addict,2018,7(1):158-170
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Rochefort C. Big Five personality and health in adults with and without cancer.
J Health Psychol,2019,24(11):1494-1504
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Prinzie P. The relations between parents' Big Five personality factors and parenting: a metaanalytic Review.
J Pers Soc Psychol,2009,97(2):351-362
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问