疫情居家期间父母教养方式与复学后欺凌受害及抑郁的关系
Relationship of Parenting Styles During COVID-19 Isolation and Bullying Victimization and Depression after Returning to School
查看参考文献33篇
文摘
|
目的:以布朗芬布伦纳的生态系统理论为依据,检验疫情居家期间父母教养方式、复学后遭受欺凌受害的情况与高中生抑郁症状之间的关系。方法:采用爱荷华青年和家庭项目中的自评教养问卷(Parenting Style Scale)、儿童抑郁量表(Children's Depression Inventory,CDI)及特拉华欺凌受害量表(学生卷)(DBVS-S)在复学后6周对广西某市某县级中学高一、高二两个年级的1379名学生进行调查。结果:母亲积极教养方式和父亲积极教养方式均与抑郁呈负相关;母亲消极教养方式和父亲消极教养方式均与抑郁呈正相关;母亲积极教养方式和父亲积极教养方式均与欺凌受害呈负相关;母亲消极教养方式和父亲消极教养方式均与欺凌受害呈正相关;欺凌受害与抑郁呈正相关。欺凌受害在母亲积极教养方式、母亲消极教养方式、父亲积极教养方式及父亲消极教养方式与抑郁的关系间中介效应显著。结论:居家期间父母的消极教养方式使孩子更易遭受欺凌受害,并引发抑郁症状;相反,居家期间父母的积极教养方式对孩子形成保护作用,使孩子不易成为欺凌受害者,因而不易产生抑郁症状。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Objective: Based on the ecosystems theories of Bronfenbrenner, the purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of parenting styles during COVID-19 isolation and bullying victimization and depression after returning to school. Methods: At the 6th week after returning to school, a total of 1379 senior high school students from a county middle school in Guangxi were investigated, using the Parenting Style Scale from Iowa Youth and Families Project, Children's Depression Inventory and Delaware Bully Victimization Scale(Student Volume). Results: Both maternal positive parenting style and paternal positive parenting style had a negative correlation with depression of students(Ps <0.01). Both maternal negative parenting style and paternal negative parenting style had a positive correlation with students'depression(Ps <0.01). Both maternal positive parenting style and paternal negative parenting style had a negative correlation with bullying victimization(P m<0.01,P p<0.05). There was a positive correlation between negative parenting style and bullying victimization(Ps <0.01). There was a positive correlation between bullying victimization and depression(Ps <0.01). Bullying victimization played a partial mediator role on the relationship between parenting styles and students'depression. Conclusion: The author concludes that negative parenting styles during COVID-19 isolation makes children more vulnerable to bullying and depressive symptoms;on the contrary, positive parenting styles during COVID-19 isolation has a protective effect on children, making them less likely to become victims of bullying victimization and thus less likely to develop depressive symptoms. |
来源
|
中国临床心理学杂志
,2022,30(2):377-381 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.02.026
|
关键词
|
父母教养方式
;
欺凌受害
;
抑郁
;
生态系统理论
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1005-3611 |
学科
|
基础医学 |
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7197293
|
参考文献 共
33
共2页
|
1.
代小蓉. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间成都市高中学生心理状况及影响因素分析.
现代预防医学,2020,47(21):3911-3914
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
罗嘉仪. 新冠肺炎疫情背景下中学生复学心理健康状况调查分析.
中小学心理健康教育,2020(22):12-15
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
3.
孙桂芝. 新冠肺炎疫情复学后高中生心理健康状况调查.
四川精神卫生,2020,33(6):506-509
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Bronfenbrenner U.
The ecology of human development,1979
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
5.
王秋英. 家庭养育方式与中学生心理健康水平的相关研究.
中国心理卫生杂志,1998(5):21-22
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
邓世英. 西方有关父母教养方式与青少年问题行为关系的理论及其研究综述.
心理发展与教育,2001(2):50-54
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Garber J. Cognitive vulnerability in children at risk for depression.
Cognition and Emotion,1997,11(5/6):619-635
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
8.
李旭. 青少年归因方式在教养方式与抑郁情绪间的中介作用.
中国心理卫生杂志,2002,16(5):327-330
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Baumrind D. Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior.
Genetic Psychology Monographs,1967,75:43-88
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Radziszewska B. Parenting style and adolescent depressive symptoms, smoking, and academic achievement: Ethnic, gender, and SES differences.
Journal of Behavioral Medicine,1996,19:289-305
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Danielle H D. Relation of positive and negative parenting to children's depressive symptoms.
Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology,2006,35(2):313-322
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Olweus D.
Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do,1993
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
13.
谢家树. 中美青少年校园欺负受害问题的比较研究.
中国临床心理学杂志,2016,24(4):706-709
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Aluede O. A review of the extent, nature, characteristics and effects of bullying behaviour in schools.
Journal of Instructional Psychology,2008,35(2):151-158
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Ballard M. Bullying and violence: A proposed prevention program.
NASSP Bulletin,2000:38-47
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Nansel T R. Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment.
Journal of the American Medical Association,2001,285(16):2094-2100
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Menesini E. Bullying and victimization in adolescence: Concurrent and stable roles and psychological health symptoms.
Journal of Genetic Psychology,2009,170(2):115-133
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
18.
李海垒. 青少年受欺负与抑郁的关系.
心理发展与教育,2012,28(1):77-82
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Hawker D S J. Twenty years'research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A metaanalytic review of cross-sectional studies.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,2000,41(4):441-455
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Stormshak E. An ecological approach to promoting early adolescent mental health and social adaptation: Familycentered intervention in public middle schools.
Child Development,2011,82(1):209-225
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|