中文版家长反思功能量表的信效度检验
Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire
查看参考文献36篇
|
文摘
|
目的:修订中文版家长反思功能量表并进行信效度检验。方法:对545名幼儿家长施测,其中184名家长在8周后完成重测;采用父母教养方式与维度问卷、幼儿依恋关系量表、亲密关系经历量表及抑郁和焦虑筛查超短量表作为效标。结果:探索性因素分析提取三因子(前心智化、确定性、兴趣和好奇心),累积方差贡献率45.15%。验证性因素分析数据拟合较好(χ~2/df =1.51,IFI=0.94,CFI=0.93,GFI=0.92,RMSEA=0.05)。三维度的Cronbach α系数为0.49,0.79,0.66,重测信度为0.67,0.53和0.61。前心智化与父母依恋、焦虑抑郁、专制教养、纵容教养、幼儿不安全依恋显著正相关,与权威教养、幼儿安全依恋显著负相关;确定性、兴趣和好奇心与父母焦虑抑郁、专制教养、纵容教养、幼儿不安全依恋显著负相关,与权威教养显著正相关。结论:中文版家长反思功能量表在幼儿家长群体中信效度良好。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective: To revise the Chinese version of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire and test its reliability and validity. Methods: 545 parents from three kindergartens in Fujian Province were selected for the test, of which 184 parents completed the retest after 8 weeks and a battery of self-reported questionnaires assessing parenting styles, children attachment, parents attachment and mental health were used as criteria. Results: Exploratory factor analysis(EFA)extracted three factors(Pre-Mentalizing, Certainty about Mental States, Interest and Curiosity), and these three factors could explain 45.15% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)results also supported the 3-factor model(χ~2/df = 1.51, IFI=0.94, CFI=0.93, GFI=0.92, RMSEA=0.05). The Cronbach α coefficients for each factor were 0.49, 0.79 and 0.66. The test-retest reliability were 0.67, 0.53 and 0.61, respectively. Pre-Mentalizing was significantly positively correlated with parents attachment, parents mental health, authoritarian and permissive parenting, children insecurity attachment, and was significantly negatively correlated with authoritative parenting, children security attachment. Certainty about Mental States, Interest and Curiosity were significantly negatively correlated with parents mental health, authoritarian and permissive parenting, children insecurity attachment, and were significantly positively correlated with authoritative parenting. Conclusion: The revised Chinese version of Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire has satisfactory reliability and validity among kindergarten parents, which can be used to measure the level of parental reflective functioning. |
|
来源
|
中国临床心理学杂志
,2022,30(2):340-345 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.02.019
|
|
关键词
|
心智化
;
家长反思功能
;
信度
;
效度
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049
3.
北京教育学院, 北京, 100120
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1005-3611 |
|
学科
|
基础医学 |
|
基金
|
北京市教育规划课题
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7197286
|
参考文献 共
36
共2页
|
|
1.
Slade A. Maternal reflective functioning, attachment, and the transmission gap: A preliminary study.
Attachment and Human Development,2005,7(3):283-298
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Fonagy P. Thinking about thinking: Some clinical and theoretical considerations in the treatment of a borderline patient.
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis,1991,72(4):639-656
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
唐秋萍. 反映能力问卷中文版的信效度研究.
中国临床心理学杂志,2017,25(2):280-284
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Diamond D. Attachment and mentalization in female patients with comorbid narcissistic and borderline personality disorder.
Personality Disorders Theory,2014,5(4):428-433
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
鲍婷婷. 反映能力与边缘性人格特征:述情障碍的中介效应.
中国临床心理学杂志,2018,26(2):309-312
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Kuipers G S. Attachment, mentalization and eating disorders: A review of studies using the adult attachment interview.
Current Psychiatry Reviews,2012,8(4):326-336
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Katznelson H. Reflective functioning: A review.
Clinical Psychology Review,2014,34(2):107-117
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Fischer-Kern M. Mentalizing in female inpatients with major depressive disorder.
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,2013,201(3):202-207
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Carpendale J. Constructing an understanding of mind: the development of children's social understanding within social interaction-response.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,2004,27(1):130-151
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Steele M.
Measuring mentalization across contexts: Links between representations of childhood and representations of parenting in an adoption sample,2008:115-138
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Slade A. Parental reflective functioning: An introduction.
Attachment and Human Development,2005,7(3):269-281
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Slade A. Reflective parenting programs: Theory and development.
Psychoanalytic Inquiry,2007,26(4):640-657
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Rutherford H J V. Investigating the association between parental reflective functioning and distress tolerance in motherhood.
Infant Behavior and Development,2015,40:54-63
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
赵丽沙. 母亲抚养压力对4~6岁儿童持续性注意的影响:夫妻冲突与母亲敏感性的中介作用.
中国临床心理学杂志,2020,28(6):1301-1304
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Fonagy P.
Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self,2002:325-460
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Slade A. Minding the baby: A reflective parenting program.
Psychoanalytic Study of the Child,2005,60:74-100
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Luyten P. The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation.
PLos One,2017,12(5):e0176218
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Lee Y. Translation and preliminary validation of a Korean version of the parental reflective functioning questionnaire.
Infant Mental Health Journal,2020,42(4):1-13
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Roo M D. Advancing optimal development in children: Examining the construct validity of a parent reflective functioning questionnaire.
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting,2019,2(1):e11561
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Nijssens L. Parental attachment dimensions and parenting stress: The mediating role of parental reflective functioning.
Journal of Child and Family Studies,2018,27:2025-2036
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问