开放式荟萃分析的规范化报告
A standardized checklist on meta-analysis reporting in the open science era
查看参考文献66篇
|
文摘
|
荟萃分析(又称元分析)以量化方式综合实证研究结果,是积累整合证据并推进基础与应用研究的重要工具.在开放式科学这种新型研究实践下,荟萃分析是整合开放数据、进行科学推断的重要手段.但荟萃分析的过程繁复、方法多样,其执行上的严谨性对荟萃分析质量影响较大,因此报告的透明性和开放性对其结果的可重复性尤为重要.为了解中文荟萃分析报告规范性的现状,让更多研究者了解荟萃分析报告的规范性与透明性,提升荟萃分析报告的质量,本文以国际学界广泛使用的系统综述和荟萃分析优先报告条目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)以及开放式科学理念为基础,结合基于效应量的荟萃分析报告特点,拟定《开放与可重复荟萃分析的报告清单》(Preferred Reporting Items for Open and Reproducible Metaanalysis,PRIOR-MA),并以心理学中的荟萃分析为例,对近五年国内发表的68篇中文荟萃分析的方法和结果部分进行回顾.基于结果,本文建议荟萃分析报告需要在以下方面进一步加强其开放性与透明性:文献搜索的时间及限制、研究筛选和数据收集过程的细节、文章筛选的流程图、效应量转换的细节、单个研究偏倚状况的评估等.本文为开放式荟萃分析提供了一个较为全面的报告清单(PRIOR-MA),为未来荟萃分析研究提供了参考. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Meta-analysis is a crucial tool for accumulating evidence in basic and applied research.In the open science era,meta-analysis becomes an important way for integrating open data from different sources.Meanwhile,because of researchers' high degree of freedom introduced by multiple-steps and multiple-choices in each step of meta-analysis,the openness and transparency are crucial for reproducing the results of meta-analysis.To reflect the transparency and openness of meta-analysis reports published in Chinese journals and improve the transparency and openness of future meta-analysis by Chinese researchers,we developed a Chinese version of a checklist for meta-analysis (Preferred Reporting Items for Open and Reproducible Meta-analysis,PRIOR-MA),which was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the principle of openness and transparency.We then surveyed the methods and results of 68 meta-analysis papers published in mainstream Chinese psychological journals in the last five years.Our results revealed that the openness and transparency of Chinese meta-analysis reports need to be improved,especially in the following aspects:the date/time and limitation of literature search,the details of screening and data collection,the flow chart of article screening,the details of effect size transformation,and the evaluation of individual research bias.The checklist,which lists almost all aspects that an open meta-analysis should include,can be used as a guide for future metaanalysis.This paper provides a comprehensive checklist (PRIOR-MA) for open meta-analysis,and provides a reference for future meta-analytic research. |
|
来源
|
中国科学. 生命科学
,2021,51(6):764-778 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.1360/SSV-2021-0009
|
|
关键词
|
荟萃分析
;
报告规范
;
可重复性
;
质量评价
;
开放式科学
|
|
地址
|
1.
清华大学心理学系, 北京, 100084
2.
Department of Clinical and Counseling Psychology,Teachers College,Columbia University, USA, New York, 10025
3.
Department of Biomedical Engineering,New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA, Newark, 07102
4.
渤海大学教育与体育学院, 锦州, 121013
5.
华南师范大学心理学院, 广州, 510631
6.
北京大学心理与认知科学学院, 行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室, 北京, 100871
7.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
8.
中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049
9.
南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系, 天津, 300350
10.
华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉, 430079
11.
北京师范大学心理学部, 北京, 100875
12.
宁波大学心理学系暨研究所, 宁波, 315211
13.
北京师范大学/IDG麦戈文脑科学研究院, 认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京, 100875
14.
国家基础学科公共科学数据中心, 北京, 100190
15.
南京师范大学心理学院, 南京, 210023
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
综述型 |
|
ISSN
|
1674-7232 |
|
学科
|
普通生物学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
中国科学技术协会学科发展项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7064115
|
参考文献 共
66
共4页
|
|
1.
Glass G V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research.
Educ Res,1976,5:3-8
|
CSCD被引
134
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Schmaal L. ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing.
Transl Psychiatry,2020,10:1-9
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Xia M. Reproducibility of functional brain alterations in major depressive disorder: Evidence from a multisite resting-state functional MRI study with 1,434 individuals.
NeuroImage,2019,189:700-714
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Yan C G. Reduced default mode network functional connectivity in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2019,116:9078-9083
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Simons D J. An introduction to registered replication reports at perspectives on psychological science.
Perspect Psychol Sci,2014,9:552-555
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Maassen E. Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology.
PLoS ONE,2020,15:e0233107
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Nosek B A. Promoting an open research culture.
Science,2015,348:1422-1425
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
左西年. 推进神经影像数据共享与开放式脑科学.
中国科学:生命科学,2020
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Sharpe D. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away.
Clin Psychol Rev,1997,17:881-901
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Ferguson C J. Comment: Why meta-analyses rarely resolve ideological debates.
Emot Rev,2014,6:251-252
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
de Vrieze J. The metawars.
Science,2018,361:1184-1188
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Ferguson C J. The public health risks of media violence: a meta-analytic review.
J Pediatr,2009,154:759-763
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Anderson C A. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in Eastern and Western countries: A meta-analytic review.
Psychol Bull,2010,136:151-173
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Gotzsche P C. Data extraction errors in meta-analyses that use standardized mean differences.
JAMA,2007,298:430-437
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Sacks H S. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.
N Engl J Med,1987,316:450-455
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
McAlister F A. The medical review article revisited: has the science improved?.
Ann Intern Med,1999,131:947-951
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Gates N J. A neuropsychologist's guide to undertaking a systematic review for publication: Making the most of PRISMA guidelines.
Neuropsychol Rev,2016,26:109-120
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Moher D. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement.
Oncol Res Treat,2000,23:597-602
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Moher D. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement.
PLoS Med,2009,6:e1000097
|
CSCD被引
355
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Liberati A. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
J Clin Epidemiol,2009,62:e1-e34
|
CSCD被引
137
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问