云服务供应链多人合作与技术创新决策的两型博弈模型
Biform game for the cloud service supply chain with multi-person cooperation and technology innovation decision
查看参考文献35篇
|
文摘
|
针对云服务供应链中既存在策略选择又存在收益分配的问题,用非合作-合作两型博弈分析了由一个云应用开发商和三个云服务运营商组成的两级云服务供应链的合作与技术创新问题.用非合作博弈分析了供应链成员的策略选择问题;用合作博弈的宗系解分配合作成员所得收益.结果表明,在不考虑下游运营商技术创新时,上游开发商会选择实力较强的运营商组合进行合作,且只有在贴标签成本较低时,才会选择贴标签以增加分配收益;而在考虑下游运营商技术创新时,下游实力较差的运营商只有在其创新收益高于实力较强的运营商时才有可能与开发商合作,且只有参与合作的运营商会选择技术创新.研究结论将为两级云服务供应链成员的策略选择及利益分配提供可操作性的建议. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
In this paper,a biform game is used to study the cooperation and technological innovation of two-stage cloud service supply chain,which is composed of one cloud application developer and three cloud service operators.The strategy selection of supply chain members is analyzed according to non-cooperative game.The clique solution of cooperative game is used to distribute the profits of cooperative developers and operators.The results obtained in this paper show that,when not considering the technological innovation of the downstream operators,the upstream developers will choose the combination of stronger operators for cooperation,and only when the cost of labeling is low they will choose the branding strategy to increase the distribution revenue.When considering the technological innovation of the downstream operators,the poor downstream operators are only likely to cooperate with the developers if their innovation revenue is higher than that of the stronger operators,and only the operators cooperating with the developers will choose the technological innovation.The conclusion obtained in this paper will provide operational suggestions for the strategy choice and the distribution of benefits of the two-stage supply chain with multi-developers and multi-operators. |
|
来源
|
系统工程理论与实践
,2021,41(7):1771-1783 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.12011/SETP2020-0408
|
|
关键词
|
云服务供应链
;
宗系解
;
两型博弈
;
技术创新
|
|
地址
|
1.
苏州科技大学商学院, 苏州, 215009
2.
桂林电子科技大学数学与计算科学学院, 桂林, 541004
3.
电子科技大学经济与管理学院, 成都, 611731
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-6788 |
|
学科
|
数学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
国家自然科学基金面上项目
;
桂林电子科技大学研究生教育创新计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7028287
|
参考文献 共
35
共2页
|
|
1.
Haluk D. The risk and information sharing of application services supply chain.
European Journal of Operational Research,2006,187(3):765-784
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Fei T. A new game theoretical resource allocation algorithm for cloud computing.
International Conference on Advances in Grid & Pervasive Computing,2010
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Pal R. Economic models for cloud service markets pricing and capacity planning.
Theoretical Computer Science,2013,496:113-124
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Hu Y. An equilibrium model of online shopping supply chain networks with service capacity investment.
Service Science,2013,5(3):238-248
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Anselmi J. Generalized Nash equilibria for SaaS/PaaS clouds.
European Journal of Operational Research,2014,236(1):326-339
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Gong Y. Methods for resource allocation via agent coalition formation in grid computing systems.
IEEE International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Systems and Signal Processing. 1,2003:295-300
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Choi T. The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation.
Journal of Operations Management,2006,24(5):637-652
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Dusit N. Resource and revenue sharing with coalition formation of cloud providers: Game theoretic approach.
Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid), 2011 11th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on,2011
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
周贵川. 资源型企业间合作技术创新影响因素的博弈分析.
管理世界,2014(1):184-185
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
李泉林. 云资源提供商的合作博弈模型与收益分配研究.
运筹与管理,2014(4):274-279
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
余佳. 考虑风险厌恶特征的供应链竞合模式比较研究.
系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(8):2091-2104
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
姜力文. 基于竞合博弈的O2O品牌制造商定价与订货联合策略.
系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(8):1951-1961
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Brandenburger A. Biform games.
Management Science,2007,53(4):537-549
|
CSCD被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
鲁馨蔓. 基于竞合博弈的云服务供应链合作与技术创新决策.
软科学,2018,32(11):39-43,64
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
王先甲. 具有外部性的合作博弈问题中的稳定的联盟结构.
系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(5):1173-1182
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
于晓辉. 信息不完全下联盟结构合作对策的比例Owen解.
系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(8):2105-2115
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
江彬倩. 多目标合作博弈最小二乘预核仁与核仁解.
系统工程理论与实践,2020,40(3):691-702
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
胡石清. 社会合作中利益如何分配?--超越夏普利值的合作博弈"宗系解".
管理世界,2018,34(6):83-93
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Ravi A. A general framework for the study of decentralized distribution systems.
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,2001,3(4):349-368
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Daniel G. A three-stage model for a decentralized distribution system of retailers.
Operations Research,2003,51(5):771-784
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问