帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

价值评估问卷中文版在大学生中的效度和信度检验
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Valuing Questionnaire in college students

查看参考文献26篇

毕丹丹 1,2   丁晴雯 1,2   张家萌 1,2   陈杰 1   李新影 1,2 *  
文摘 目的:评估价值评估问卷(VQ)中文版在大学生中的效度和信度。方法:在大学生中收集有效问卷625份,其中224人同时完成幸福感、负性情绪状态和心理灵活性其他成分3类效标工具,选取其中100人进行两周后重测。结果:探索性因子分析提取VQ“进展”和“障碍”2个因子;验证性因子分析表明,两因子结构拟合可以接受(SBχ~2=75.173,df=31,CFI=0.939,TLI=0.912,RMSEA=0.068,SRMR=0.056)。心理幸福感、生活满意度和积极情绪与进展得分正相关(r=0.55、0.52、0.63),而与障碍得分负相关(r=-0.61、-0.45、-0.41);负性情绪状态得分、心理灵活性的经验性回避得分与进展得分负相关(r=-0.41、-0.38),而与障碍得分正相关(r=0.53、0.47),均P<0.01。2个因子的Cronbach α系数分别为0.81和0.68,重测信度分别为0.68和0.70。结论:价值评估问卷(VQ)中文版在大学生中具有可接受的效度和信度。
其他语种文摘 Objective:To examine the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Valuing Questionnaire (VQ) in college students.Methods:Totally 625 college students were assessed with the VQ and 224 of them were asked to complete the validity questionnaires at the same time.After 2 weeks,100 participates of 244 filled in the VQ to assess the test-retest reliability.Results:The exploratory factor analysis showed that the VQ consisted 2 factors,namely progress and obstruction.The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the hypothesized 2-factor model (SBχ~2=75.173,df=31,CFI=0.939,TLI=0.912,RMSEA=0.068,SRMR=0.056).The scores of psychological well-being,life satisfaction and positive affect were positively correlated with progress score (r=0.55,0.52,0.63),and were negatively correlated with obstruction score (r=-0.61,-0.45,-0.41).The scores of negative emotions and experimental avoidance werenegatively correlated with progress (r=-0.41,-0.38),and were positively correlated with obstruction (r=0.53,0.47,Ps<0.01).The Cronbach α coefficients of the progress and obstruction were 0.81 and 0.68,and the test-retest reliabilities were 0.68 and 0.70.Conclusion:It suggests that the Chinese versionof the Valuing Questionnaire (VQ) has acceptable psychometric properties in college students.
来源 中国心理卫生杂志 ,2021,35(5):417-422 【核心库】
DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2021.05.011
关键词 接纳承诺疗法(ACT) ; 心理灵活性 ; 价值 ; 效度 ; 信度
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

2. 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1000-6729
学科 社会科学总论
基金 应激下情绪与记忆的认知神经机制
文献收藏号 CSCD:6961723

参考文献 共 26 共2页

1.  A-tjak J G. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. PsychotherPsychosom,2015,84(1):30-36 CSCD被引 13    
2.  Hayes S C. Acceptance and commitment therapy:model,processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther,2006,44(1):1-25 CSCD被引 75    
3.  张婍. 接纳与承诺疗法的心理病理模型和治疗模式. 中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(5):377-381 CSCD被引 37    
4.  Reilly E D. A systematic review of values measures in acceptance and commitment therapy research. J Contextual BehavSci,2019,12:290-304 CSCD被引 1    
5.  Carvalho S A. The utility of the valuing questionnaire in chronic pain. J Contextual BehavSci,2018,9:21-29 CSCD被引 1    
6.  Hoyer J. Valued living before and after CBT. J Contemp Psychother,2020,50(1):37-45 CSCD被引 1    
7.  Chase J A. Values are not just goals:online ACT-based values training adds to goal setting in improving undergraduate college student performance. J Contextual BehavSci,2013,2(3):79-84 CSCD被引 1    
8.  Wilson K G. The valued living questionnaire:defining and measuring valued action within a behavioral framework. Psychol Rec,2010,60(2):249-272 CSCD被引 3    
9.  Lundgren T. The bull' s eye values survey:a psychometric evaluation. CognBehavPract,2012,19(4):58-526 CSCD被引 1    
10.  Ciarrochi J. The link between value motives,value success,and well-being among people diagnosed with cancer. Psychooncology,2010,20(11):1184-1192 CSCD被引 1    
11.  Smout M. Development of the valuing questionnaire (VQ). J Contextual BehavSci,2014,3(3):164-172 CSCD被引 1    
12.  Rickardsson J. Assessing values-psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the valuing questionnaire in adults with chronic pain. J Contextual BehavSci,2019,14:40-49 CSCD被引 1    
13.  土井理美. 日本語版valuing questionnaire (VQ)の信頼性と妥当性の検証. 行動療法研究,2017,43(1):83-94 CSCD被引 1    
14.  Christie A M. The meaning and doing of mindfulness:the role of values in the link between mindfulness and well-being. Mindfulness,2016,8(2):368-378 CSCD被引 1    
15.  Mosher C E. Symptom experiences in metastatic breast cancer patients:relationships to activity engagement,value-based living,and psychological inflexibility. Psychooncology,2017,26(11):1944-1951 CSCD被引 1    
16.  Morrison K L. Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on impulsive decision-making. BehavModif,2020,44(4):600-623 CSCD被引 2    
17.  Krafft J. A randomized controlled trial of multiple versions of an acceptance and commitment therapy matrix app for well-being. BehavModif,2019,43(2):246-272 CSCD被引 1    
18.  吴双磊. 大学生完美主义倾向及与心理幸福感的关系研究,2007 CSCD被引 2    
19.  熊承清. 生活满意度量表中文版在民众中使用的信度和效度. 中国健康心理学杂志,2009,17(8):948-949 CSCD被引 73    
20.  黄丽. 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(1):54-56 CSCD被引 176    
引证文献 1

1 焦瑞超 中学生体象灵活性问卷的编制及效度信度检验 中国心理卫生杂志,2025,39(6):515-521
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号