质子治疗机房的屏蔽设计方案国内外比较
Shielding design scheme for proton therapy treatment rooms: Comparison between Chinese and international radiation shielding standards for radiotherapy facilities
查看参考文献17篇
|
文摘
|
目的探讨国内外不同辐射防护标准对质子治疗机房屏蔽设计的影响。方法以一个多室质子中心机房为例,分别根据美国国家辐射防护与测量委员会(NCRP) 151号报告、新加坡辐射防护法案、英国ACoP指南以及国家标准GBZ/T 201.5-2015规定的辐射防护限值,得到相应的屏蔽方案。比较各个机房间隔墙和机房与控制室间隔墙厚度,在保持各个机房设计尺寸不变的前提下,从机房有效使用面积、建设成本等方面讨论上述4种屏蔽方案的差异性。结果由NCRP 151号报告计算得到的各机房墙体(A~F)厚度最薄,由国家标准计算得到的墙体厚度最厚,其中两个旋转治疗室间隔墙厚度增加了1倍以上,总的治疗室使用面积减少17.69%,总建筑材料成本增加44万元。结论通过比较不同屏蔽标准对质子治疗机房设计的影响,发现与其他国际法规或标准相比,我国现行的质子机房辐射屏蔽标准远高于其他国家,这会显著增加机房的屏蔽墙厚度,对国内的质子治疗技术的发展及将来升级到超高剂量率治疗模式都有一定影响。建议参考质子治疗技术相对成熟的国家标准和经验,适当放宽瞬时剂量率限值条件,增加更能反映现实治疗工况的时间平均剂量率(time averaged dose rate, TADR)限值条件,以更好地实现机房屏蔽设计的最优化原则。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To explore the impacts of different foreign and domestic radiation shielding standards on the shielding design of proton therapy treatment rooms. Methods A multi-room proton therapy center was taken as an example. Different shielding schemes were determined for the center according to different radiation shielding limits stipulated in NCRP Report No. 151,the Singapore Radiation Protection Act, the UK Approved Code of Practice and Guidance, and the national standard in China GBZ/T 201.5-2015. Afterwards, the thickness of the walls between two adjacent treatment rooms and the walls between the control room and its adjacent treatment room were compared. Meanwhile, the differences among the four radiation shielding schemes were discussed in terms of effective usable areas and the construction cost of concrete on the premise that each room's design size remains the same in these four schemes. Results The calculation result revealed that the concrete shielding walls (A-F) of the treatment rooms determined according to NCRP Report No. 151 were the thinnest. In contrast, the walls of the treatment rooms determined according to GBZ/T 201.5-2015 were the thickest, among which the wall between the two adjacent gantry rooms was more than doubled in thickness. As a result,the total usable area of the four treatment rooms decreased by 17.69%,and the total construction cost increased by 440 thousand yuan. Conclusions Compared with other regulations and standards listed in this paper, the current national standard in China is the strictest in terms of radiation shielding criteria. This will notably increase the shielding wall thickness and will have certain impacts on the development of domestic proton therapy technology and the possible upgrade to ultra-high dose rate treatment mode in the future. Therefore, it is recommended that the threshold of the instantaneous dose rate (IDR) should be appropriate improved and the limit of the time-averaged close rate (TADR) that can better reflect actual treatment conditions be added by referring to the standards and experience of countries with mature proton therapy technologies. In this way, the shielding for proton therapy treatment rooms can be designed optimally. |
|
来源
|
中华放射医学与防护杂志
,2020,40(12):911-918 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2020.12.004
|
|
关键词
|
质子治疗
;
辐射防护
;
屏蔽设计
;
标准
|
|
地址
|
1.
合肥离子医学中心肿瘤放疗科, 230088
2.
中国科学院等离子体物理研究所, 合肥, 230031
3.
国家癌症中心中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院放疗科, 国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心, 北京, 100021
4.
中国科学技术大学离子医学研究所, 合肥, 230026
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0254-5098 |
|
学科
|
医药、卫生 |
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6876148
|
参考文献 共
17
共1页
|
|
1.
Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
IPEM Report No. 75. Design and shielding of radiotherapy treatment facilities,2017
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Ipe N E.
PTCOG Report No. 1. PTCOG Publications Sub-committee Task Group on shielding design and radiation safety of charged particle therapy facilities,2020
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
中华人民共和国卫生部.
GBZ/T 201.5-2015放射治疗机房辐射屏蔽规范第5部分:质子加速器放射治疗机房,2015
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
夏文龙. 粒子治疗技术的进展.
中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2017,26(8):951-955
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Lai B L. Shielding analysis of proton therapy accelerators: a demonstration using Monte Carlo-generated source terms and attenuation lengths.
Health Phys,2015,108(2 Suppl 2):S84-S93
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Sheu R J. Source terms and attenuation lengths for estimating shielding requirements or dose analyses of proton therapy accelerators.
Health Phys,2013,105(2):128-139
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
中华人民共和国卫生部.
GBZ/T 201.2-2011放射治疗机房辐射屏蔽规范第2部分:电子直线加速器放射治疗机房,2011
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Singapore Legislation Division of the Attorney-general' s Chambers. Radiation protection act ( chapter 262,section 28): radiation protection ( ionising radiation) regulations.
Singapore statutes,2001
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Avery S. Analytical shielding calculations for a proton therapy facility.
Radiat Prot Dosim,2008,131(2):167-179
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Newhauser W D. The physics of proton therapy.
Phys Med Biol,2015,60(8):R155-R209
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
NCRP Report No. 151. Structural shielding design and evaluation for megavoltage X-and gamma-ray radiotherapy facilities,2005
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Agosteo S. Shielding design for a proton medical accelerator facility.
IEEE Transact Nucl Sci,1996,43(2):705-715
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
International Atomic Energy Agency.
Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources, international basic safety standards, and general safety requirements,part 3 (interim),2011:65-90
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
国家质量监督检验检疫总局.
GB 18871-2002电离辐射防护与辐射源安全基本标准,2003
|
被引
73
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
International Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA Safety Reports Series No. 47. Radiation protection in the shielding of radiotherapy facilities,2006
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Favaudon V. Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice.
Sci Transl Med,2014,6(245):245ra93
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Bourhis J. Treatment of a first patient with FLASH-radiotherapy.
Radiother Oncol,2019,139:18-22
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问