双模式交通系统中拥挤费收入返还策略研究
Research on the revenue allocation strategies of congestion charge in a two-modal transport system
查看参考文献18篇
文摘
|
在地铁公交和道路驾车两种出行方式并存且竞争的交通系统中,将出行者分为有小汽车和无小汽车两类,有小汽车的出行者可以选择驾驶小汽车或乘坐地铁出行,无小汽车的出行者只能乘坐地铁出行.在瓶颈道路最优收费下,考虑地铁车厢拥挤成本,分析了拥挤费收入返还给公共交通出行者的五种方案,给出了兼顾个人出行成本公平与道路交通出行效率的拥挤费收入分配比例,并通过数值算例验证了理论结果. |
其他语种文摘
|
A competitive transportation system with a mass transit (subway) parallel to a road way constrained by a bottleneck is considered. All travelers are divided into two groups. All travelers of one group have cars, and the other group have no cars. Travelers with cars can choose driving car or taking the subway, and travelers without cars can only take the subway. Under the optimal charging of bottleneck road, this paper analyzes five strategies to return the congestion charge revenue for public transportation travelers considering the body congestion cost of carriage in subway, and introduces the distribution proportion of the congestion charge revenue which takes into account the equity of individual travel cost and the efficiency of road traffic system, and verifies the theoretical results through numerical examples. |
来源
|
系统工程理论与实践
,2020,40(12):3210-3219 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.12011/setp2020-0144
|
关键词
|
双模式
;
拥挤费收入
;
返还
;
公平
|
地址
|
1.
内蒙古财经大学统计与数学学院, 呼和浩特, 010070
2.
北京航空航天大学经济管理学院, 北京, 100191
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-6788 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
内蒙古自治区高等学校科学技术研究项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6868219
|
参考文献 共
18
共1页
|
1.
Goodwin P. The "Rule of Three": A possible solution to the political problem of competing objectives for road pricing.
Traffic Engineering & Control,1989,30(10):495-497
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Small K. Using the revenues from congestion pricing.
Transportation,1992,19(4):359-381
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Litman T. Using road pricing revenue: Economic efficiency and equity considerations.
Transportation Research Record,1996,1558(1):24-28
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Parry I. Revenue recycling and the welfare effects of road pricing.
The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,2001,103(4):645-671
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Schaller B. New York City's congestion pricing experience and implications for road pricing acceptance in the United States.
Transport Policy,2010,17(4):266-273
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Tabuchi T. Bottleneck congestion and modal split.
Journal of Urban Economics,1993,34(3):414-431
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Danielis R. Bottleneck road congestion pricing with a competing railroad service.
Transportation Research Part E,2002,38(5):379-388
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Huang H J. Fares and tolls in a competitive system with transit and highway: The case with two groups of commuters.
Transportation Research Part E,2000,36(4):267-284
|
CSCD被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
9.
徐淑贤. 用户异质下公交定价和道路收费收入再分配.
系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(7):1791-1799
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
10.
李志纯. 基于活动方法的瓶颈模型与拥挤收费问题研究.
管理科学学报,2017,20(8):97-105
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
郭倩雯. 公交乘客福利补贴及公交企业运营管制.
系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(4):994-1002
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Wang J. Optimal parking supply in bi-modal transportation network considering transit scale economies.
Transportation Research Part E,2019,130(10):207-229
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Arnott R. Departure time and route choice for the morning commute.
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,1990,24(3):209-228
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Arnott R. A structural model of peak-period congestion: A traffic bottleneck with elastic demand.
American Economic Review,1993,83(1):161-179
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Vickrey W S. Congestion theory and transport investment.
American Economic Review,1969,59(2):251-260
|
CSCD被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Small K A. The scheduling of consumer activities: Work trips.
American Economic Review,1982,72(3):467-479
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Smith M J. The existence of a time dependent equilibrium distribution of arrivals at a single bottleneck.
Transportation Science,1984,18(4):385-394
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Daganzo C F. The uniqueness of a time dependent equilibrium distribution of arrivals at a single bottleneck.
Transportation Science,1985,19(1):29-37
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|