61份大麦种质资源对蠕孢菌叶斑病的抗性鉴定
Evaluation of resistance in 61 barley germplasm accessions to spot blotch caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana
查看参考文献28篇
文摘
|
麦根腐平脐蠕孢菌[Bipolaris sorokiniana(Sacc.)Shoemaker]引起的叶斑病是大麦上重要的病害叶部之一,在世界各大麦主要种植区均能造成严重的经济损失。本研究利用3个致病力不同的蠕孢叶斑病菌株Z 12010、Z 12014和Z 13010分别对来源于中国及国外引进的61份大麦种质资源进行苗期抗蠕孢菌叶斑病鉴定,田间接种Z 12014菌株进行成株期抗病性鉴定。在所鉴定的大麦种质中未发现在苗期或成株期对叶斑病免疫的材料。苗期抗叶斑病分析发现,品种之间对3个菌株的抗性存在明显差异,Varunda、Legacy、Tradition、09GW-01、09GW-07、08PJ-36、09PJ-39、垦啤麦7号、垦啤麦10号、驻大麦3号、S-4和中饲麦1号等12份材料对3个菌株表现为中抗至高抗反应型。7份材料成株期抗Z 12014菌株,其中Legacy、蒙啤麦3号、09PJ-39、垦啤麦9号、垦啤麦11号和龙啤麦3号等6份材料具有全生育期抗性特点,品种10-3苗期对菌株Z 12014感病,而成株期抗该菌株。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Spot blotch,caused by the fungal pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana(Sacc.)Shoemaker,is one of the important foliar diseases on barley,which can cause serious yield losses in the barley-growing regions worldwide.In this study,three Bs isolates(Z 12010,Z 12014,and Z 13010)with different patterns of pathogenicity were used to test the spot blotch resistance of 61 barley germplasm accessions collected from China and other countries at the seedling stage.The adult-plant resistance to spot blotch in this set of barley germplasms was evaluated by inoculating isolate Z 12014 in the field.There was no barley accession showing immune reaction to spot blotch.Significant difference in the seedling resistance were found among the accessions against the three pathogenic isolates.Twelve accessions,Varunda,Legacy,Tradition,09GW-01,09GW-07,08PJ-36,09PJ-39,Kenpimai 7,Kenpimai 10,Zhudamai 3,S-4,and Zhongsimai 1,were moderately or highly resistant to the three isolates examined.Seven barley accessions were resistant to isolate Z 12014 at the adult-plant stage,of which 6 accessions,Legacy,Mengpimai 3,09PJ-39,Kenpimai 9,Kenpimai 11,and Longpimai 3,showed all-stage resistance,and variety 10-3 was susceptible at the seedling stage but resistant at the adult-plant stage to isolate Z 12014. |
来源
|
植物病理学报
,2020,50(5):602-609 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.13926/j.cnki.apps.000340
|
关键词
|
大麦
;
蠕孢菌叶斑病
;
种质资源
;
苗期抗性
;
成株抗性
|
地址
|
1.
长江大学,农学院, 主要粮食作物产业化湖北省协同创新中心, 荆州, 434025
2.
中国农业科学院植物保护研究所, 植物病虫害生物学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100193
3.
西南科技大学,西南科技大学生命科学与工程学院, 绵阳, 621010
4.
黑龙江省农业科学院作物资源研究所, 哈尔滨, 150086
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0412-0914 |
学科
|
植物保护 |
基金
|
国家现代农业(大麦青稞)产业技术体系建设专项
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6819852
|
参考文献 共
28
共2页
|
1.
Lu L S.
Barley sciences in China ( in Chinese),1996:143-149
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Roy J K. Association mapping of spot blotch resistance in wild barley.
Molecular Breeding,2010,26(2):243-256
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Agostinetto L. Barley spot blotch intensity,damage,and control response to foliar fungicide application in southern Brazil.
Crop Protection,2015,67:7-12
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Steffenson B J. Genetics of seedling and adult plant resistance to net blotch ( Pyrenophora teres f. teres ) and spot blotch ( Cochliobolus sativus) in barley.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics,1996,92(5):552-558
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Kumar J. Bipolaris sorokiniana,a cereal pathogen of global concern: cytological and molecular approaches towards better control.
Molecular Plant Pathology,2002,3(4):185-195
|
CSCD被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Lan G F. Research progress on barley common root rot.
大麦与谷类科学,2014(4):19-22
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Tekauz A. Survey for foliar diseases of barley in Manitoba in 2002.
Canadian Plant Disease Survey-Disease Highlights,2003,83:60-61
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Kidambi R D. Influence of infection by Cochliobolus sativus on yield components of spring barley.
Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology,1985,7(3):238-241
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Clark R V. Yield losses in barley cultivars caused by spot blotch.
Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology,1979,1(2):113-117
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Fetch T G. Diversity and sources of multiple disease resistance in Hordeum spontaneum.
Plant Disease,2003,87(12):1439-1448
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Fetch T G. Spring barley accessions with dual spot blotch and net blotch resistance.
Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology,2008,30(4):534-542
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Yao Q J. Investigation and evaluation of barley germplasm accesions resistance to spot blotch ( in Chinese).
植物病理学报,2019,49(1):77-84
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Wilcoxson R D. Development of barley resistant to spot blotch and genetics of resistance.
Plant Disease,1990,74(3):207-210
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Peterson G A. Registration of'Dickson'barley.
Crop Science,1968,8(3):397
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Rasmusson D C. Registration of 'Morex'barley.
Crop Science,1979,19(2):293-293
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Foster A E. Registration of Hazen Barley.
Crop Science,1984,24(6):1210-1210
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Ghazvini H. Virulence diversity in the population of Bipolaris sorokiniana.
Plant Disease,2007,91(7):814-821
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Gyawali S.
Association mapping of resistance to common root rot and spot blotch in barley,and population genetics of Cochliobolus sativus,2010
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Guo H Q. Virulence and molecular diversity in the Cochliobolus sativus population causing barley spot blotch in China.
Plant Disease,2019,103:2252-2262
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Rehman S. First report of spot blotch of barley caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana in Morocco.
Plant Disease,2019
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|