波动率风险和波动率风险溢酬:中国的独特现象
Volatility risk and volatility risk premium:Anomalies in China's market
查看参考文献34篇
文摘
|
本文以美国市场作为对比,运用多种方法深入考察了中国市场的波动率风险和波动率风险溢酬,发现中国市场具有与美国市场不同的异常现象.首先,与美国市场不同,中国股票市场上的波动率风险整体而言并非系统性风险,而是呈现出暴跌时期显著为负,非暴跌时期显著为正的明显时变特征;其次,虽然中国市场的波动率风险是非系统性风险,但期权隐含的波动率风险溢酬却显著为负,这与美国情形不同,也不符合金融原理,可能意味着中国期权价格存在高估.进一步的模拟Buy-Write策略结果证实中国期权价格的确存在持续的系统性高估. |
其他语种文摘
|
In comparison to the US market,we use several methods to study the volatility risk and the volatility risk premium in China's market.We find that there exist anomalies in China's market.First,unlike the US market,the volatility risk in China's market is not a systematic risk on the whole.It is time-varying,and shows significantly negative during crash period while significantly positive during non-crash period.Second,the option-implied volatility risk premium in China is negative although the volatility risk is not a systematic risk,which differs from the US market and does not match the principles of finance.That might mean the options should be continuously overpriced in China.It is proved by the simulation of the Buy-Write strategy. |
来源
|
系统工程理论与实践
,2019,39(12):2995-3010 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.12011/1000-6788-2019-0888-16
|
关键词
|
波动率风险
;
波动率风险溢酬
;
测度转换
;
delta中性
;
Buy-Write策略
|
地址
|
1.
厦门大学经济学院, 厦门, 361005
2.
厦门大学管理学院, 厦门, 361005
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-6788 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6697604
|
参考文献 共
34
共2页
|
1.
丛明舒. 中国场内期权市场研究--基于中美关于期权隐含方差的差异.
金融研究,2018(12):189-206
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Cochrane J H.
Asset pricing,2001
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Coval J D. Expected option returns.
Journal of Finance,2001,56(3):983-1009
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Bakshi G. Delta-hedged gains and the negative market volatility risk premium.
Review of Financial Studies,2003,16(2):527-566
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Carr P. Variance risk premiums.
Review of Financial Studies,2009,22(3):1311-1341
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Black F. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.
Journal of Political Economy,1973,81(3):637-654
|
CSCD被引
727
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Bollerslev T. Dynamic estimation of volatility risk premia and investor risk aversion from option-implied and realized volatilities.
Journal of Econometrics,2011,160(1):235-245
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
8.
陈蓉. 波动率风险溢酬:基于香港和美国期权市场的研究.
商业经济与管理,2012,1(2):53-59
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Bekaert G. The VIX,the variance premium and stock market volatility.
Journal of Econometrics,2014,183(2):181-192
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
10.
陈蓉. 波动率风险溢酬: 时变特征及影响因素.
系统工程理论与实践,2011,31(4):761-770
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Chernov M. A study towards a unified approach to the joint estimation of objective and risk neutral measures for the purpose of options valuation.
Journal of Financial Economics,2000,56(3):407-458
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Pan J. The jump-risk premia implicit in options:Evidence from an integrated time-series study.
Journal of Financial Economics,2002,63(1):3-50
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Duan J C. Jump and volatility risk premiums implied by VIX.
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2010,34(11):2232-2244
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
14.
吴鑫育. 波动率风险溢价--基于VIX的实证.
系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(s1):1-11
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Glosten L R. On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks.
Journal of Finance,1993,48(5):1779-1801
|
CSCD被引
114
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Engle R F. Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility.
Journal of Finance,1993,48(5):1749-1778
|
CSCD被引
55
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Bollerslev T. Leverage and volatility feedback effects in high-frequency data.
Journal of Financial Econometrics,2006,4(3):353-384
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
18.
郑振龙. 波动率风险及风险价格--来自中国A股市场的证据.
金融研究,2011(4):143-157
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Black F. Studies of stock price volatility changes.
Proceedings of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statistical Association,Business and Economic Statistics. 81,1976:177-181
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Christie A C. The stochastic behavior of common stock variances:Value,leverage and interest rate effects.
Journal of Financial Economics,1982,10(4):407-432
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|