基于多目标遗传算法和FLUS模型的西北农牧交错带土地利用优化配置
Land Use Optimization Configuration based on Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm and FLUS Model of Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest China
查看参考文献41篇
文摘
|
西北农牧交错带生态环境脆弱,区位特殊性和生态重要性使其在我国社会经济发展和生态环境保护方面具有重要战略意义。通过对该区域进行土地利用优化配置,使有限的土地资源支撑起生态环境保护和经济发展的重任是本文的出发点。多目标遗传算法和FLUS模型的应用可以从多方面(数量结构、空间布局、综合效益)完善土地利用优化配置,为土地利用优化配置提供更多的选择方案。本文选用多目标遗传算法和FLUS模型对该区域进行2025年的土地利用变化模拟,通过设置自然发展、生态保护优先、经济发展优先、生态-经济均衡4种情景,探讨了如何在兼顾生态环境保护与社会经济发展的情况下进行土地利用的优化配置。结果表明,基于生态-经济均衡情景下的优化方案,土地利用类型的数量结构和空间布局更为合理,其综合效益优于另外3种情景。该情景在合理限制经济发展速度的前提下,使生态建设获得稳定发展,其经济效益较生态保护优先情景下增长了8.96%,生态效益较经济发展优先情景下增长了0.77%,在生态保护与经济发展2种目标之间达到平衡,为西北农牧交错带的土地利用规划提供了决策辅助。 |
其他语种文摘
|
The ecological environment of the agro-pastoral ecotone in Northwest China is extremely fragile. Due to global warming, the frequent droughts in this region have seriously affected agriculture and animal husbandry, which is not conducive to the sustainable socio-economic development of the agro-pastoral ecotone there. It is the special location and ecological value that determine the region has an important strategic significance in socio-economic development and ecological environment protection in China. The usage of land resources plays an important role in not only the ecological environment, but the socio-economy. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to achieve ecological environmental protection and economic development by optimizing the allocation of limited land resources in the region. The application of multi-objective genetic algorithm and FLUS model can improve the land use optimization configuration from many aspects (i.e., quantitative structure, spatial distribution, comprehensive benefits). In addition, the combination of the genetic algorithm and multi-objective programming model can provide more alternative options for it. In this paper, the multi-objective genetic algorithm and FLUS model are used to simulate the land use change of the region in 2025. By setting up four scenarios (i.e., natural development, ecological protection priority, economic development priority and eco-economic equilibrium), we explore how to optimize land use allocation on the condition of considering both the protection of ecological environment and the development of social economy. The results suggest that the eco-economic equilibrium optimization scheme shows great advantages in both the quantitative structure and spatial distribution of land use types, and its comprehensive benefits are superior to the other three scenarios. On the premise of reasonably limiting the speed of economic development, this scenario has enabled the ecological construction to develop at stable speed. Its economic benefits have increased by 8.96% compared with those under the ecological protection priority scenario, and its ecological benefits have increased by 0.77% compared with those under the economic development priority scenario. The scenario achieves the coordination between ecological protection and economic development.The eco-economic equilibrium optimization scheme has shown great potential in many aspects, such as promoting the development of unused land, assisting in the adjustment of land use structure, and driving the optimization of industrial structure. The optimal allocation of land use provides decision-making assistance for the future ecological environment construction and economic development planning of the agro-pastoral ecotone in this region. In addition, to solve the contradiction between economic development and ecological construction in the agro-pastoral ecotone, the government should strictly co-ordinate arrangements for various types of land, while enhancing the comprehensive utilization of land resources. |
来源
|
地球信息科学学报
,2020,22(3):568-579 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.190531
|
关键词
|
土地利用优化
;
多目标遗传算法
;
FLUS模型
;
Markov Chain
;
GM(1,1)模型
;
生态环境保护
;
生态-经济均衡
;
西北农牧交错带
|
地址
|
兰州大学资源环境学院, 兰州, 730000
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1560-8999 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
国家科技基础资源调查项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6696149
|
参考文献 共
41
共3页
|
1.
马冰滢. 基于生态-经济权衡的京津冀城市群土地利用优化配置.
地理科学进展,2019,38(1):26-37
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
2.
陆军辉. 土地利用配置的混沌蚁群优化算法研究.
地球信息科学学报,2017,19(8):1026-1035
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
3.
魏伟. 基于CLUE-S模型和生态安全格局的石羊河流域土地利用优化配置.
武汉大学学报·信息科学版,2017,42(9):1306-1315
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
4.
穆亚超.
基于Landsat影像的西北农牧交错带地区植被信息提取,2017
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
5.
曾晟轩. 西北农牧交错带中部气候变化特征及其持续性.
水土保持研究,2018,25(4):356-364
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
6.
杜华明. 北方农牧交错带干旱灾害及其对暖干气候的响应.
干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(1):124-128
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
7.
刘家福. 基于Markov模型的长岭县土地利用时空变化研究.
水土保持研究,2009,16(3):16-19
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
8.
田贺. 基于SD模型的中国2010-2050年土地利用变化情景模拟.
热带地理,2017,37(4):547-561
|
CSCD被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
9.
耿红. 基于灰色线性规划的土地利用结构优化研究.
武汉测绘科技大学学报,2000,25(2):167-171,182
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
10.
刘欣. 基于CLUE-S模型的多目标土地利用格局模拟与优化———以河北省廊坊市北三县为例.
地理与地理信息科学,2018,34(5):92-98
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Zhang H H. Simulating multi-objective land use optimization allocation using Multi-agent system: A case study in Changsha, China.
Ecological Modelling,2016,320:334-347
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
12.
黎夏. 基于神经网络的元胞自动机及模拟复杂土地利用系统.
地理研究,2005,24(1):19-27
|
CSCD被引
130
次
|
|
|
|
13.
张美美. 基于ANN-CA的银川平原湿地景观演化驱动力情景模拟分析.
地球信息科学学报,2014,16(3):418-425
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
14.
刘小平. 基于多智能体的土地利用模拟与规划模型.
地理学报,2006,61(10):1101-1112
|
CSCD被引
72
次
|
|
|
|
15.
邓华. 多因素耦合下三峡库区土地利用未来情景模拟.
地理学报,2016,71(11):1979-1997
|
CSCD被引
49
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Liu X P. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects.
Landscape and Urban Planning,2017,168:94-116
|
CSCD被引
331
次
|
|
|
|
17.
胡碧松. 基于CA-Markov 模型的鄱阳湖区土地利用变化模拟研究.
长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(6):1207-1219
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
18.
岳东霞. 基于CA-Markov模型的石羊河流域生态承载力时空格局预测.
生态学报,2019,39(6):1993-2003
|
CSCD被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Liu D F. Optimal rural land use allocation in central China: Linking the effect of spatiotemporal patterns and policy interventions.
Applied Geography,2017,86:165-182
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Wu M. A coupled SD and CLUE-S model for exploring the impact of land use change on ecosystem service value: A case study in Baoshan district,Shanghai, China.
Environmental management,2015,56(2):402-419
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|