帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

越老越风险规避吗?—年龄对冲动性预测决策行为的调节效应
Are Older Adults More Risk-Averse? Task-Specific Effect of Impulsiveness on Age-Related Decision Changes

查看参考文献28篇

喻婧 1 *   饶俪琳 2   雷旭 1  
文摘 心理学质性研究具有漫长的过去,却只有短暂的历史。心理学自诞生起就具有质性研究传统,但被主流所忽视。从组织机构、出版渠道和研究成果方面看,当前国内外心理学质性研究的发展态势暗示质性研究传统正在回归到主流当中。尽管仍存在误解和急功近利等众多问题和困难需要克服,但是心理学质性研究方法在研究复杂心理现象和产生新的概念、新的理论方面展现了潜力。心理学质性研究的复兴正使心理学处于一个多元化转向的阶段。
其他语种文摘 Decision-making under risk changes with age.This age-related difference is often attributed to the alteration in risk tolerance.A recent age-related decision-making meta-analysis suggested that in decisions from experience,age-related differences in risk taking were a function of decreased learning performance,whereas in decisions from description,younger adults and older adults showed similar risk-taking behavior.However,little is known about whether age-related differences in decision-making reflect a direct effect of aging or,alternatively,are caused by age-related changes in risk attitudes,like impulsiveness.Our main goal was to investigate older adults' risk propensity in different decision-making tasks,namely,description-based and experience-based tasks.Moreover,this study was to determine whether self-report of impulsiveness could predict behavior on different decision tasks,and whether this prediction could be mediated by age.We tested two groups of participants:27 older adults (age 65.56±5.38;29.63% male) and 27 younger adults (age 21.04±1.60;40.74% male).All participants completed a battery of psychometric tests including Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11th version (BIS-11),and two sets of decision-making tasks:a description-based task Cambridge Gambling Task (CGT) and an experience-based task Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).During the CGT,participants were told that a token was hidden under one of the red or blue cards,with color ratios changing from 5:1,4:2,to 3:3.To indicate the location of the token,participants had to bet on one color of the cards,and the bets were associated with a certain amount ratio (10 vs.90,30 vs.70,or 50 vs.50) for each choice.During the BART,participants were told that they would inflate a balloon on each of a number of trials by pressing "pump" button.Each pump could earn participants 0.1 CNY;however,if the balloon exploded,they would lose the money accumulated on that trial.Older adults reported lower levels of impulsive behavior in the motor impulsiveness,attentional impulsiveness,and non-planning impulsiveness as compared with younger adults.However,older adults were more likely to choose options that had a low probability of winning on the CGT,showing a risk-seeking propensity.The decision of older adults was also significantly different than those of younger adults on the BART;however,for this task,older adults made more risk-averse decisions than the younger adults.Besides the heterogeneous results of these two tasks,the findings have shown that older adults made significantly lower quality decisions than younger adults.Moreover,the moderation analysis showed that the effects of age upon decision-making reflected an indirect influence of age-related impulsiveness decline.In conclusion,different decision-making tasks do not entirely succeed in capturing the same age-related risk-taking propensity.Moreover,our study highlights that the relationship between aging and decision making is mediated,in part,by self-assessment of impulsiveness.Our results show that in order to truly understand the age-related alterations upon decision-making,future research may consider take into account the convergent and predictive validity of self-report,and behavioral measures of risk taking.
来源 心理科学 ,2019,42(6):1382-1388 【扩展库】
DOI 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20190615
关键词 质性心理学 ; 质性研究 ; 质性方法
地址

1. 西南大学心理学部, 重庆, 400715  

2. 中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100010

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1671-6981
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 ;  国家教育部人文社会科学研究项目 ;  重庆市社会科学规划项目 ;  中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金
文献收藏号 CSCD:6639150

参考文献 共 28 共2页

1.  李献云. Barratt冲动性量表中文修订版社区和大学人群中应用的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志,2011,25(8):610-615 被引 50    
2.  Brandstatter E. The priority heuristic:Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review,2006,113(2):409-432 被引 21    
3.  Cavanagh J F. Individual differences in risky decision-making among seniors reflect increased reward sensitivity. Frontiers in Neuroscience,2012,6:111 被引 2    
4.  Deakin J. Risk taking during decision-making in normal volunteers changes with age. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,2004,10(4):590-598 被引 3    
5.  de Wit H. IQ and nonplanning impulsivity are independently associated with delay discounting in middle-aged adults. Personality and Individual Differences,2007,42(1):111-121 被引 6    
6.  Enticott P G. Associations between laboratory measures of executive inhibitory control and self-reported impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences,2006,41(2):285-294 被引 1    
7.  Frey R. The role of cognitive abilities in decisions from experience: Age differences emerge as a function of choice set size. Cognition,2015,142:60-80 被引 1    
8.  Goetzmann W N. Equity portfolio diversification. Review of Finance,2008,12(3):433-463 被引 3    
9.  Henninger D E. Processing speed and memory mediate age-related differences in decision making. Psychology and Aging,2010,25(2):262-270 被引 3    
10.  Kinsella K. An aging world: 2008: International population reports,2009 被引 1    
11.  Komiotis G M. Do older investors make better investment decisions?. The Review of Economics and Statistics,2011,93(1):244-265 被引 2    
12.  Lejuez C W. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The balloon analogue risk task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,2002,8(2):75-84 被引 25    
13.  Malloy-Diniz L. Impulsive behavior in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Characterization of attentional, motor and cognitive impulsiveness. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,2007,13(4):693-698 被引 1    
14.  Mata R. Age differences in risky choice: A meta-analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,2011,1235(1):18-29 被引 5    
15.  Mata R. The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging,2007,22(4):796-810 被引 5    
16.  Moeller F G. Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. American Journal of Psychiatry,2001,158(11):1783-1793 被引 34    
17.  Rao L L. Decreasing ventromedial prefrontal cortex deactivation in risky decision making after simulated microgravity: Effects of-6° head-down tilt bed rest. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,2014,8:187 被引 5    
18.  Roalf D R. Risk, reward, and economic decision making in aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,2012,67(3):289-298 被引 1    
19.  Rogers R D. Choosing between small, likely rewards and large, unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience,1999,19(20):9029-9038 被引 2    
20.  Rolison J J. Risky decision making in younger and older adults: The role of learning. Psychology and Aging,2012,27(1):129-140 被引 3    
引证文献 1

1 宋皓杰 工作时间与工作绩效的非线性关系:一项元分析 心理科学进展,2022,30(12):2666-2680
被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号