帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

青少年回避与融合问卷(简版)的信效度分析
Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth(AFQ-Y8)

查看参考文献26篇

陈燕红 1,2,3   赵颖 4   段艳梅 5   白晓宇 1,2,3   王淑娟 1,3   祝卓宏 1,2,3 *  
文摘 目的:考察中文版青少年回避与融合问卷(简版)(Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth, AFQ-Y8)在我国青少年群体中的信效度。方法:选取样本一为来自全国32个省级行政区的874名青少年,施测AFQ-Y8中文版和中国中学生心理健康量表(Mental Health Inventory of Middle-school Students, MMHI-60)以检验问卷的结构效度和效标效度;样本二为131名云南某中学初中生,施测AFQ-Y8中文版和接纳与行动问卷第二版(Acceptance and Action Questionnaire—2~(nd) Edition, AAQ-II)以检验问卷的聚合效度,间隔两周后对样本二再次施测以检验重测信度。结果:探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析均证实AFQ-Y8为单因素结构。AFQ-Y8得分与MMHI-60总分和各因子得分均呈显著正相关(r =0.38~0.54,P <0.001),与AAQ-II得分高度正相关(r =0.75,P <0.001)。量表的Cronbach α系数为0.78,重测信度为0.76。结论:AFQ-Y8中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可用于测量我国青少年的心理灵活性。
其他语种文摘 Objective: To examine the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y8) in Chinese adolescents. Methods: 874 adolescents from 32 different provincial-level administrative regions(Sample 1) were invited to complete AFQ-Y8 and the Mental Health Inventory of Middle-school Students (MMHI-60) to evaluate the construct validity and the criterion validity. 131 students from a junior middle school in Yunnan (Sample 2) were invited to complete AFQ-Y8 and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire—2nd Edition(AAQ-II) to evaluate the convergent validity. All students from Sample 2 completed the questionnaires again two weeks later to evaluate the test-retest reliability. Results: The result of exploratory factor analysis indicated AFQ-Y8 comprised a single factor, accounting for 40.04% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the single-factor model fit well(χ~2/ df =2.45, RMR=0.05, GFI=0.97, NNFI=0.93, RFI=0.90, CFI=0.96, IFI=0.96, RMSEA=0.06, NFI=0.93, AGFI=0.95). The scores of AFQ-Y8 were positively correlated with the scores of MMHI-60(r =0.38~0.54,Ps <0.001) and AAQ-II(r =0.75,P < 0.001). The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.78, and the test-retest reliability was 0.76. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the AFQ-Y8 has good reliability and validity and thus could be used as an instrument for assessing the psychological flexibility of Chinese adolescents.
来源 中国临床心理学杂志 ,2019,27(6):1192-1195,1114 【核心库】
DOI 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2019.06.023
关键词 青少年 ; 心理灵活性 ; 信度 ; 效度
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101  

2. 中国科学院大学, 北京, 100049  

3. 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

4. 北京东方金桥教育科技有限公司, 北京, 100085  

5. 云南省红河州泸西县中枢镇初级中学, 泸西, 652403

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1005-3611
学科 基础医学
基金 北京市科技计划项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:6630194

参考文献 共 26 共2页

1.  Bond F W. Psychological Flexibility, ACT, and Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management,2006,26(1/2):25-54 CSCD被引 5    
2.  Hayes S C. A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy,2004:59-76 CSCD被引 4    
3.  Yovel I. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and the New Generation of Cognitive Behavioral Treatments. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences,2009,46(4):304-309 CSCD被引 2    
4.  A-Tjak J G. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,2015,84(1):30-36 CSCD被引 13    
5.  陈玥. 接纳承诺疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍综述. 中国临床心理学杂志,2018,26(1):205-208 CSCD被引 9    
6.  Hayes L. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for the Treatment of Adolescent Depression: A Pilot Study in a Psychiatric Outpatient Setting. Mindfulness,2011,2(2):86-94 CSCD被引 3    
7.  Livheim F. The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Adolescent Mental Health: Swedish and Australian Pilot Outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies,2015,24(4):1016-1030 CSCD被引 2    
8.  Woidneck M R. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Among Adolescents. Behavior Modification,2014,38(4):451-476 CSCD被引 3    
9.  Swain J. Mechanisms of change: Exploratory outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for anxious adolescents. Journal of Contextual Behavior Science,2015,4(1):56-67 CSCD被引 1    
10.  Wicksell R K. Evaluating the effectiveness of exposure and acceptance strategies to improve functioning and quality of life in longstanding pediatric pain--a randomized controlled trial. Pain,2009,141(3):248-257 CSCD被引 3    
11.  Gauntlett-Gilbert J. Acceptance and values-based treatment of adolescents with chronic pain: outcomes and their relationship to acceptance. Journal of Pediatric Psychology,2013,38(1):72-81 CSCD被引 2    
12.  Hayes S C. Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behavior Research and Therapy,2006,44(1):1-25 CSCD被引 74    
13.  Hayes S C. Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record,2004,54(4):553-578 CSCD被引 24    
14.  Greco L A. Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Psychological Assessment,2008,20(2):93-102 CSCD被引 6    
15.  Christodoulou A. Greek Version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth: Psychometric Evaluation and Gender Multigroup Invariance in Adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,2018,36(8):844-849 CSCD被引 1    
16.  Valdivia-Salas S. Spanish Validation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Assessment,2017,24(7):919-931 CSCD被引 1    
17.  Cederberg J T. A preliminary validation of the Swedish short version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth(AFQ-Y8) for children and adolescents with cancer. Journal of Contextual Behavior Science,2018,10(2):103-107 CSCD被引 1    
18.  Szemenyei E. Measuring Psychological Inflexibility in Children and Adolescents: Evaluating the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Assessment,2018 CSCD被引 1    
19.  Livheim F. Psychometric properties of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth: A psychological measure of psychological inflexibility in youth. Journal of Contextual Behavior Science,2016,5(2):103-110 CSCD被引 2    
20.  Renshaw T L. Screening for Psychological Inflexibility: Initial Validation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth as a School Mental Health Screener. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,2017,35(5):482-493 CSCD被引 1    
引证文献 3

1 胡心怡 大学生疫情压力感知、心理灵活性对抑郁的影响:有调节的中介作用 中国临床心理学杂志,2020,28(4):739-742
CSCD被引 11

2 彭彪 父母拒绝对中学生抑郁的影响:自尊与心理僵化的链式中介作用 中国临床心理学杂志,2021,29(4):773-777
CSCD被引 6

显示所有3篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号