帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

区域可持续发展能力的能值与㶲耦合分析模型构建
Construction of an emergy and exergy coupling model for the analysis of regional sustainable development capability

查看参考文献66篇

樊新刚 1,2   仲俊涛 3   杨美玲 4   文琦 4   马振宁 4   米文宝 4 *  
文摘 可持续发展能力评价方法是识别人地协同规律、支撑科学决策的重要工具和热点需求。通过文献回顾与理论分析框架构建,耦合能值及㶲方法,提出自组织能力指数(SO)、生态压力指数(EP)、可持续发展能力指数(SC)构成的,基于热力学理论的可持续发展能力分析模型,利用文献荟萃法筛选17个典型发达国家1985年状态值计算SO与EP阈值,划分了4个阶段。利用中美两国1985-2015年特征对比验证,结果显示:① 2005年以前中国属“低自组织能力、低生态压力”阶段,之后进入“低自组织能力、高生态压力”阶段,存在低生态效率、规模扩张驱动特征;美国一直属“高自组织能力、高生态压力”阶段,存在高生态效率驱动、经济与生态脱钩特征,与全球生态足迹网络和世界自然基金会等的研究结果一致,模型具有较好适应性和可靠性。②模型利用“获得㶲量/输入能值量”表达经济社会生态效率、“经济社会㶲损耗量/生态系统年产㶲量”表达生态压力,连接了经济社会对生态基底的熵化路径,可识别区域所处可持续发展阶段、分析水平变化和驱动因素。③模型以人类与生态并重的视角,从深度上反映经济社会的生态效率、从广度上评价生态空间被占用比例,具有宏观规模与微观效率分析相结合的优势,是对经典方法的补充。
其他语种文摘 Methods for the evaluation of sustainable development capability are important and highly sought after tools for identifying the synergistic relationship between humans and the environment and guiding scientific decision-making for the implementation of ecological and environmental protection measures. Compared to traditional methods such as ecological footprint, environmental sustainability index, and human development index, emergy analysis and exergy analysis result in smaller errors and are more objective. These two methods can directly convert materials and services into energy units, without evaluation indicators and weight settings, and do not require raw dimensionless data. Exploring the coupling of emergy analysis and exergy analysis can provide a new perspective on and method for the analysis of regional sustainable development capabilities. Based on a literature review, a theoretical analysis framework was constructed. This study proposes an emergy and exergy coupling model for the analysis of sustainable development capability based on a thermodynamic theory. This analytical model has three indices, namely, self- organizing capability index (SO), ecological pressure index (EP), and sustainable development capability index (SC). The emergy and exergy input and output values of 17 typical developed countries in 1985 were screened via meta-analysis to calculate the SO and EP thresholds of the model, based on which sustainable development capability was divided into four stages. The model was tested via a comparative analysis of the sustainable development capability of China and the USA in 1985- 2015. The results show that China was in the low self-organizing capacity and low ecological pressure stage before 2005. After 2005, it entered the low self-organizing capability and high ecological pressure stage. It has had low eco- efficiency and scale expansion driving characteristics. The USA is always in the high self- organizing capacity and high ecological pressure stage, and is characterized by high ecological efficiency, and economic and ecological decoupling. These results are consistent with the findings of the World Ecological Footprint Network and World Wildlife Fund, indicating that the proposed model is adaptive and reliable. In addition, the study results indicate that this model can express the ecological efficiency of an economic and social system in terms of "total annual exergy amount used/annual emergy input amount". Moreover, it can express the ecological pressure as "annual exergy loss of an economic and social system/annual eco- exergy produced by an ecosystem." This model connects the entropy path of an economic and social system to the ecosystem. Furthermore, it can identify sustainable development stage and analyze changes in sustainable development level and factors driving these changes. From an anthropological and ecological perspective, the model expresses the ecological efficiency of an economic and social system, evaluates the proportion of ecological space occupied, and can combine macroscopic scale with microscopic efficiency analysis, which is an improvement over conventional methods.
来源 地理学报 ,2019,74(10):2062-2077 【核心库】
DOI 10.11821/dlxb201910008
关键词 可持续发展能力 ; 自组织能力 ; 生态压力 ; 能值 ; 㶲 ; 耦合模型
地址

1. 宁夏大学西部发展研究中心, 银川, 750021  

2. 宁夏大学经济管理学院, 银川, 750021  

3. 青海师范大学地理科学学院, 西宁, 810016  

4. 宁夏大学资源环境学院, 银川, 750021

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0375-5444
学科 社会科学总论;社会与环境
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 ;  宁夏自然科学基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:6597001

参考文献 共 66 共4页

1.  Caiado R G G. Towards sustainable development through the perspective of ecoefficiency: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,165:890-904 CSCD被引 5 次    
2.  樊杰. 人地系统可持续过程、格局的前沿探索. 地理学报,2014,69(8):1060-1068 CSCD被引 78 次    
3.  黄茄莉. 国际可持续性评价方法研究进展与趋势. 生态经济,2015,31(1):18-22 CSCD被引 5 次    
4.  靳相木. 自然资源核算的生态足迹模型演进及其评论. 自然资源学报,2017,32(1):163-176 CSCD被引 13 次    
5.  Krajnc D. A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,2005,43(2):189-208 CSCD被引 13 次    
6.  黄宝荣. 中国2000~2010年生态足迹变化特征及影响因素. 环境科学,2016,37(2):420-426 CSCD被引 23 次    
7.  吴健生. 基于生态足迹的城市地域可持续发展能力评价——以深圳为例. 资源科学,2008,30(6):850-856 CSCD被引 14 次    
8.  Yang Yu. Progress in China’s sustainable development research: Contribution of Chinese geographers. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(8):1176-1196 CSCD被引 11 次    
9.  曹斌. 可持续发展评价指标体系研究综述. 环境科学与技术,2010,33(3):99-105 CSCD被引 19 次    
10.  王红. 基于物质流分析的中国减物质化趋势及循环经济成效评价. 自然资源学报,2015,30(11):1811-1822 CSCD被引 5 次    
11.  王琳. 环境-社会经济系统物质流分析研究述评. 生态经济,2018,34(3):44-52 CSCD被引 3 次    
12.  Nielsen S N. A Common framework for emergy and exergy based LCA in accordance with Environ Theory. International Journal of Ecodynamics,2007,2(3):170-185 CSCD被引 1 次    
13.  樊新刚. 宁夏限制开发生态区生态经济系统协调发展研究,2015 CSCD被引 3 次    
14.  Campbell D E. Emergy baseline for the Earth: A historical review of the science and a new calculation. Ecological Modelling,2016,339:96-125 CSCD被引 3 次    
15.  Nakicenovic N. Regional and global exergy and energy efficiencies. Energy,1996,21(3):223-237 CSCD被引 1 次    
16.  Ukidwe N U. Thermodynamic input-output analysis of economic and ecological systems. Handbook of Input-output Economics in Industrial Ecology,2009 CSCD被引 1 次    
17.  Gong M. Exergy analysis of the supply of energy and material resources in the Swedish society. Energies,2016,9(9):1-16 CSCD被引 1 次    
18.  樊新刚. 扩展(火用)方法在区域生态经济驱动机制及效率研究中的应用. 应用生态学报,2017,28(1):273-280 CSCD被引 6 次    
19.  Fischer-Kowalski M. Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a vital factor in analysing the environmental impact of socio-economic metabolism. Population & Environment,2001,23(1):7-47 CSCD被引 7 次    
20.  Brown M T. Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: Monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecological Engineering,1997,9(1/2):51-69 CSCD被引 126 次    
引证文献 12 篇

1 樊杰 中国区域发展格局演变过程与调控 地理学报,2019,74(12):2437-2453
CSCD被引 55 次

2 米文宝 近35年来宁夏大学人文—经济地理学研究进展与展望 经济地理,2020,40(5):29-39
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有12篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号