东北地区经济结构失衡水平评价及其对经济增长的影响研究--基于空间计量模型分析
The Evaluation of Imbalance of Economic Structure and Its Influence on Economic Growth: Based on the Spatial Econometric Model
查看参考文献27篇
文摘
|
构建包括产业结构、投资消费结构、金融结构、区域经济结构和国际收支结构在内的经济结构失衡测度指标体系,运用因子分析法和ArcGIS空间分析法对2003~2015年东北地区经济结构失衡水平、空间格局及集聚模式进行探究,并构建空间计量模型考察其对经济增长的影响。结果表明:①东北地区经济结构普遍处于失衡状态,但失衡水平在不断降低。②经济结构失衡水平高值区被低值区包围,在空间上形成典型中心-外围分布模式。③ SDM模型估计结果表明,经济结构失衡对经济增长的影响具有阶段性,2003~2008年,对经济增长产生抑制作用,并表现出负空间溢出效应,而2009~2015年对经济增长产生促进作用,出现“失衡并增长”。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Along with the economy development goes into a new normal in China, the economic structure imbalance becomes one of highlighted economic problems, especially in Northeast China. This phenomenon has attracted wide attention from scholars and society. The state government points out that the adjustment of economic structure and the transformation of economic development mode, are not only important measurements to promote healthy development of national economy, but also vital methods to prosper the economy in Northeast China. Therefore, it is of important academic significance and practical value to analyze economic structure imbalance and its influence on economic growth. Based on this, this study establishes an evaluation index of economic structure imbalance, including industrial structure, investment and consumption structure, financial structure, regional economic structure and international payments structure, explores level of economic structure and its spatial-temporal characteristics of 34 cities in Northeast China from 2003 to 2015 by using factor analysis method and ArcGIS spatial analysis method. Due to the spatial effects of per capita GDP, then the paper sets up spatial econometrics models (including spatial lag model, spatial error model and spatial Durbin model) in order to explore the impact of economic structure imbalance on economic growth in Northeast China, which are different from traditional regression models ignoring space factors. The results show that: 1) Generally speaking, the economic structure in Northeast China is in imbalanced condition, but the level of imbalance is continuously decreasing. There is spatial heterogeneity in the level of imbalance, and the high level of imbalance area mainly concentrates in resource-based and old industrial cities. 2) High-value areas with imbalanced level of economic structure are surrounded by low-value areas, presenting a typical "core-periphery" distribution pattern in space. 3) Among three spatial econometrics models, the regression result obtained by spatial Durbin model is more convincing than the other two. The model reveals that the impact of economic structure imbalance is of a periodic characteristic. In the period of 2003 to 2008, it inhibits economic growth and generates significantly negative spillover effects. However, from 2009 to 2015, it promotes economic growth, that is“imbalance but growth”. The reasons for this seemingly contradictory are as followings: on one hand, from the previous analysis, the imbalance level of economic structure has been declining after adjustment, and appears a trend towards equilibrium. According to the principle of evolutionary economy, when the economic structure changes from imbalance to equilibrium, new drivers emerge and promote economic growth. On the other hand, in the Northeast China, the main driving forces for economic growth origin from the secondary, tertiary industry and investment, structure imbalance within a certain range can still stimulate economic growth weakly. |
来源
|
地理科学
,2019,39(4):636-643 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.04.013
|
关键词
|
经济结构
;
结构失衡
;
经济增长
;
空间计量模型
;
东北地区
|
地址
|
东北师范大学地理科学学院, 吉林, 长春, 130024
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家社会科学基金
;
东北师范大学哲学社会科学校内重点培育项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6495071
|
参考文献 共
27
共2页
|
1.
陈妍. 东北地区资源型城市经济转型发展波动特征与影响因素——基于面板数据模型的分析.
地理科学,2017,37(7):1080-1086
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Chenery H B. Patterns of industrial growth.
American Economic Review,1960,50(4):624-654
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Kuznets S.
Modern economic growth: Rate, structure, and spread,1966
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Kongsamut P. Beyond balanced growth.
Review of Economic Studies,2001,68(4):869-882
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Ngai L R. Structural change in a multisector model of growth.
American Economic Review,2007,97(1):429-443
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Peneder M. Industrial change and aggregate growth.
Structural Change & Economic Dynamics,2003,14(14):427-448
|
CSCD被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Hartwig J. Structural change, aggregate demand and employment dynamics in the OECD, 1970-2010.
Structural Change & Economic Dynamics,2015,34(1):36-45
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Alonso-Carrera J. Demand-based structural change and balanced economic growth.
Journal of Macroeconomics,2015,46:359-374
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
9.
项俊波. 中国经济结构失衡的测度与分析.
管理世界,2008(9):1-11
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
10.
刘迎秋.
中国宏观经济运行报告(2013~2014),2013
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
张伟. 我国经济结构测度及其影响因素的实证研究.
东北大学学报(自然科学版),2013,34(2):301-304
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
刘伟. 中国经济增长中的产业结构变迁和技术进步.
经济研究,2008(11):4-15
|
CSCD被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
13.
干春晖. 改革开放以来产业结构演进与生产率增长研究——对中国1978-2007年"结构红利假说"的检验.
中国工业经济,2009(2):55-65
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
14.
陈利. 基于产业结构视角的云南省县域经济差异研究.
地理科学,2016,36(3):384-392
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
15.
李汝资. 中国产业结构变迁中的经济效率演进及影响因素.
地理学报,2017,72(12):2179-2198
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
16.
于婷婷. 东北地区人口结构与经济发展耦合关系研究.
地理科学,2018,38(1):114-121
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
17.
马仁锋. 海洋产业影响省域经济增长估计及其分异动因判识.
地理科学,2018,38(2):177-185
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
18.
刘燕妮. 经济结构失衡背景下的中国经济增长质量.
数量经济技术经济研究,2014(2):20-35
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
19.
国家统计局城市社会经济调查司.
中国城市统计年鉴,2004:2016
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
辽宁省统计局.
辽宁统计年鉴,2004:2016
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|