空间认同:城市空间研究转向中的知识前沿、趋势与启发
Spatial Identity: Knowledge Frontiers, Trends and Enlightenment of Urban Space Research
查看参考文献46篇
|
文摘
|
中国城市化进程的快速发展,促使人们不断解构、调整和重构对城市空间的认同,这是城市化发展中不容忽视的新问题。以Web of Science(WoS)为数据源,对国外城市空间认同研究进行了分析和知识再现。研究发现:①城市空间认同是人们对城市发展中社会经济认同、文化认同、集体认同、身份认同与情感认同的集合。作为重要的国民意识,城市空间认同主题是国外学者关注的重要领域,对该领域研究的本质上是对城市空间实践中人文主义空间诉求的知识表征;②在2008~2017年的国外城市空间认同研究中,美国、英国、澳大利亚等国家具有明显优势,国际合作研究网络主要在美洲-欧洲、欧洲-澳洲,以及澳洲-欧美之间;国外城市空间认同研究高被引文献注重对“空间多中心性”“地方与连续性”“城市社区”“城市公民身份”“空间绅士化”“地方主义”等方面的讨论。③未来研究更加倾向在“认同”“空间”“城市”“地理”“政治”“地方”,以及“社区”等新主题方面。相比较而言,国内对城市空间认同的研究较为欠缺,随着中国城市空间实践不断推向纵深阶段,需要强化城市空间认同研究的“理论自觉”。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The rapid development of China’s urbanization process has prompted people to deconstruct, adjust and reconstruct urban spatial identity continously. This is a new problem that cannot be ignored in the development of urbanization in China. Urban spatial identity is an important theme in the era of urban cultural pluralism. Taking Web of Science (WoS) citation database as data source, this paper analyzes and reproduces the researches of urban spatial identity conducted abroad. The essence of urban spatial identity is the collection of people ′ s social and economic identity, cultural identity, collective identity, individual identity and emotional identity in urban development. As an important type of national consciousness, the theme of urban spatial identity is a great concern to foreign scholars. The research in this field is essentially a knowledge representation of humanistic space demands in urban spatial practice. In the study of foreign urban spatial identity from 2008 to 2017, the United States, Britain, Australia and other countries have obvious advantages. The international cooperation research networks are mainly in America-Europe, Europe-Australia, and between Australia and Europe and America. Most of the highly cited literatures on urban spatial identity abroad focus on the discussion of‘spatial multicentricity’‘locality and continuity’‘urban community’‘urban citizenship’‘space gentrification’and‘ localism’. In the future, the study of urban spatial identity will turn to focus on new themes such as ‘identity’‘space’‘city’‘geography’‘politics’‘place’and‘community’. In contrast, there is a lack of research on urban spatial identity in China. With the development of urban space practice in China, it is necessary to strengthen the‘theoretical consciousness’of urban space identity research. China’s urban space research needs a global perspective. Although there are differences between China’s urbanization development and western developed countries, foreign research on urban space identity can provide reference and inspiration for China’s urban space practice and healthy development in the new era. |
|
来源
|
地理科学
,2019,39(4):587-595 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.04.008
|
|
关键词
|
城市空间认同
;
城市空间研究转向
;
知识图谱
|
|
地址
|
南京农业大学人文与社会发展学院, 江苏, 南京, 210095
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6495066
|
参考文献 共
46
共3页
|
|
1.
Proshansky H M. The city and self-identity.
Environment and Behavior,1978,10(2):147-169
|
CSCD被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
吴细玲. 对城市空间认同的思考-以厦门城市空间为例.
特区经济,2015,340(5):43-47
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Casey E S. Between Geography and Philosophy: What does it mean to be in a place-world?.
Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1997,87(3):509-531
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Massey D.
Space, place and gender,1994:146-156
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
May J. Globalization and the politics of place: Place and identity in an inner London neighbourhood.
Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers, NS,1996,21(1):194-215
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
苏贾.
后现代地理学-重申批判社会理论中的空间,2007:116-120
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
郭文. “空间的生产”内涵、逻辑体系及对中国城镇化实践的思考.
经济地理,2014,34(6):33-39
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
陈悦.
引文空间分析原理与应用,2014:15-17
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
李杰.
Citespace:科技文献挖掘及可视化,2016:34-77
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Massey D.
For space,2005
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Valentine G. Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounters.
Progress in Human Geography,2008,32(3):323-337
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Scannell L. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework.
Journal of Nvironmental Psychology,2009,30(1):1-10
|
CSCD被引
41
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Podmore J. Critical commentary: Sexualities landscapes beyond homonormativity.
Geoforum,2013,49:263-267
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Kooy M. Technologies of government: Constituting subjectivities, spaces, and infrastructures in colonial and contemporary Jakarta.
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2008,32(2):375-391
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Marquez F B. Spatial frontiers and neo-communitarian identities in the city: The case of Santiago de Chile.
Urban Studies,2008,45(7):1461-1483
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Keene D E. Race, class and the stigma of place: Moving to 'opportunity' in Eastern Iowa.
Health & Place,2010,16(6):1216-1223
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Samara T R. Order and security in the city: Producing race and policing neoliberal spaces in South Africa.
Ethnic and Racial Studies,2010,33(4):637-655
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Wacquant L. Territorial stigmatization in action.
Environment and Planning A,2014,46(6):1270-1280
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Grove J M. An ecology of prestige in New York city: Examining the relationships among population density, socio-economic status, group identity, and residential canopy cover.
Environmental Management A,2014,54(3):402-419
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Hervani A A. Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework.
Sustainability,2017,9(1):68-70
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问