帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

基于PS-DR-DP理论模型的区域资源环境承载力综合评价
The comprehensive evaluation of regional resources and environmental carrying capacity based on PS-DR-DP theoretical model

查看参考文献47篇

王亮 1,2,3   刘慧 1,2 *  
文摘 资源环境承载力状态评价研究成果众多,研究视角多侧重于“压力—状态—响应”模型的传统途径。本文构建了区域资源环境承载力综合评价框架体系,通过建立“PS-DR-DP”正六边形相互作用力理论模型,将资源环境承载力分解为“压力—支撑力”“破坏力—恢复力”“退化力—提升力”三对相互作用力,分别对应资源支撑能力、环境容量和风险灾害抵御能力,根据不同作用力大小变化所引起的六边形的形状和面积的变化综合测度区域资源环境承载力状态的变化。基于上述理论模型,采用分类排列多边形图示法,研究了北京市2010-2015年资源环境承载力状态的变化。结果表明,2010-2015年北京市资源环境承载力趋于理想承载状态。2010年正向因子综合承载作用力与负向因子综合承载作用力的比值为1.0143,比值大于1,区域承载状态较好;而2015年该比值为1.1411。与2010年相比,2015年北京市资源环境承载状态相对更佳。2015年相比较于2010年,负向因子作用力均减弱,正向因子综合作用力增强。2015年人口规模为2171万,承载贡献均值为0.7025,进入最佳承载门槛,且仍具有进一步承载的空间。研究结论对北京市2020年人口规模控制在2300万以内提供了理论支撑。
其他语种文摘 There are many achievements on the state evaluation of resources and environmental carrying capacity. Most of the studies use the traditional analysis method together with the "Pressure- State- Response" model. This article first constructs a comprehensive evaluation framework system of regional resources and environmental carrying capacity. Then it builds the "PS- DS- DP" hexagon interactional theory model and divides the carrying capacity into three pairs of interaction forces, namely "Pressure-Support", "Destructiveness-Resilience" and "Degradation- Promotion", which correspond to resources supporting ability, environmental capacity and risk disaster resisting ability, respectively. The negative load of carrying capacity includes pressure, destructiveness and degradation, while support, resilience and promotion represent the positive ones. With the changes of the shape and area of the hexagon caused by the interaction forces, the state of regional resources environmental carrying capacity could be measured. This study figures out that the state value of carrying capacity is equal to the ratio of the positive contribution value to the negative contribution value. The regional load condition shows good if the ratio is over 1, and the bigger the better. Once the ratio is less than 1, it has to be warned. Regional carrying capacity rating standards in this paper are delimited by 4 levels: Ⅰ (≤0.30), Ⅱ (0.30- 0.70), Ⅲ (0.70- 0.85) and Ⅳ (≥0.85) corresponding to a lower level balance load for a region with an approximate stable state, an unstable state caused by the high speed increasing, an ideal carrying capacity of an approximate stable state, and a full load with the system collapse. A perfect state is not to reach the limit while remaining the system stable. Based on the above theoretical models and the earlier achievements, this research applies the classified- array polygon method to explore the state change of resources environmental carrying capacity of Beijing from 2010 to 2015. According to the general research hypothesis, the increasing population will add to the regional resources pressure. But Beijing's resource pressure has a slight decrease as the city's population grows, which differs from the conclusions that the city was overloaded. The result shows that Beijing is getting close to a perfect state. The state value of carrying capacity was 1.0143 in 2010 and increased to 1.1411 in 2015, suggesting that Beijing's carrying capacity turned better in 2010-2015. Compared to 2010, the negative factor forces became weakened and the positive ones continued to enhance in 2015. With the average rank value achieving 0.7025 in 2015, Beijing reached the optimal load threshold and still had space for further carrying. Finally, these results give a theoretical support for Beijing to control the population within 23 million by 2020.
来源 地理学报 ,2019,74(2):340-352 【核心库】
DOI 10.11821/dlxb201902010
关键词 综合承载力 ; PS-DR-DP模型 ; 人口规模 ; 北京市
地址

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京, 100049  

3. 北京师范大学地理科学学部, 北京, 100875

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0375-5444
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家重点研发计划专项
文献收藏号 CSCD:6431248

参考文献 共 47 共3页

1.  Park R E. Introduction to the Science of Sociology,1970:1-12 CSCD被引 1 次    
2.  Meadows D H. The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,1972,4(3):323-332 CSCD被引 4 次    
3.  FAO. Agro-ecological Zoning: Guidelines. Fao Soil Bulletins,1996 CSCD被引 1 次    
4.  Karnopp D. System Dynamics: A Unified Approach,1990 CSCD被引 4 次    
5.  Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Focus,1992,6(2):121-130 CSCD被引 582 次    
6.  Ress W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: Measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy. Focus,1994,6(2):121-130 CSCD被引 1 次    
7.  Odum H T. Environmental accounting: Emergy and environmental decision making. Child Development,1996,42(4):1187-1201 CSCD被引 10 次    
8.  封志明. 百年来的资源环境承载力研究:从理论到实践. 资源科学,2017,39(3):379-395 CSCD被引 126 次    
9.  Celine C. Assessing carrying capacities of coastal areas in France. Journal of Coastal Conservation,2008,12(1):27-34 CSCD被引 4 次    
10.  Guyondet T. Climate change influences carrying capacity in a coastal embayment dedicated to shellfish aquaculture. Estuaries & Coasts,2015,38(5):1593-1618 CSCD被引 3 次    
11.  Reghunathan V M. Factors affecting the environmental carrying capacity of a freshwater tropical lake system. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment,2016,188(11):615 CSCD被引 4 次    
12.  Brown K. Environmental carrying capacity and tourism development in the Maldives and Nepal. Environmental Conservation,1997,24(4):316-325 CSCD被引 6 次    
13.  Sarma A K. Estimating Sustainable Carrying Capacity of Flood Prone Hilly Urban Areas. Urban Hydrology,Watershed Management and Socio-Economic Aspects,2016 CSCD被引 1 次    
14.  Irankhahi M. Combination of GISFM and TOPSIS to evaluation of urban environment carrying capacity (Case study: Shemiran City, Iran). International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology,2017,14(6):1-16 CSCD被引 8 次    
15.  Mwalyosi R B B. Population growth, carrying capacity and sustainable development in south-west Masailand. Journal of Environmental Management,1991,33(2):175-187 CSCD被引 2 次    
16.  竺可桢. 论我国气候的几个特点及其与粮食作物生产的关系. 地理学报,1964,30(1):1-13 CSCD被引 45 次    
17.  曾维华. 人口、资源与环境协调发展关键问题之一:环境承载力研究. 中国人口·资源与环境,1991,1(2):33-37 CSCD被引 24 次    
18.  施雅风. 乌鲁木齐河流域水资源环境承载力及其合理利用,1992:94-112 CSCD被引 1 次    
19.  王中根. 区域生态环境承载力的量化方法研究. 长江工程职业技术学院学报,1999,16(4):9-12 CSCD被引 1 次    
20.  高吉喜. 区域可持续发展的生态承载力研究,1999 CSCD被引 10 次    
引证文献 25 篇

1 王曼曼 长三角沿海地区土地承载力测度与耦合分析 农业工程学报,2020,36(5):281-292
CSCD被引 2 次

2 欧惠 基于“三生空间”的福建省城市综合承载力研究 生态科学,2020,39(3):71-79
CSCD被引 8 次

显示所有25篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号