帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

幼儿对所有权权利的理解
Preschoolers' understanding of ownership rights

查看参考文献50篇

李占星 1   牛更枫 1   喻丰 1 *   朱莉琪 2 *  
文摘 对物品的所有权意味着所有者对所有物具有多重权利,如触碰、使用、更改、追踪和转移等。研究发现, 3岁幼儿就能理解,所有者对自己的物品具有触碰权和使用权,而他人不具有。但是,他们理解所有物的更改权、追踪权和转移权,却相对滞后。这提示对不同所有权权利表征的发展可能是分化的。此外, 3岁幼儿还理解所有者具有赋予他人使用所有物的权利,还会积极维护这种权利,并对阻止权利实施的行为表示抗议,说明他们也能理解二级所有权权利。为什么幼儿对不同所有权权利的表征会出现分化,其背后的机制需要未来研究的探索。此外,某些公共物品(如公共汽车)本身存在着所有权权利相分离的情况,幼儿是如何表征的,也值得我们进行研究。不同文化对所有权权利的侧重不同,提示我们有必要对所有权权利认知的发展进行跨文化检验。
其他语种文摘 To own an object means that the owner has many informative rights to the object, such as touching, using, changing, tracking and transferring. Research revealed that 3-year-old children understand that an owner have exclusive rights to touch and use his/her own objects but others do not, but their understandings of owners' rights to change, track and transfer property are relatively poorer. This indicates that the development of children's representation of ownership rights may not be synchronous. Three-yearolds understand that an owner has right to entitle others to use his/her property, and actively maintain this. When someone prevents the enforcement of this right, they will protest. This demonstrates that young children are aware of second-order ownership rights. In future studies, the mechanisms underlying the dissociation among representations of different ownership rights should be explored. Besides, it is worthwhile investigating how children represent ownership rights of public property(such as buses). Different cultures may put different weight on specific ownership right, which calls for more cross-cultural studies.
来源 心理科学进展 ,2018,26(12):2153-2160 【核心库】
DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02153
关键词 所有权权利 ; 所有权三元理论 ; 多维权利理论 ; 二级所有权权利
地址

1. 西安交通大学人文社会科学学院社会心理学研究所, 西安, 710049  

2. 中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1671-3710
学科 社会科学总论
基金 中国博士后科学基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:6388686

参考文献 共 50 共3页

1.  程南华. 儿童的社会权力认知及其与社会行为的关系. 心理科学进展,2018,26(2):283-293 CSCD被引 2    
2.  李占星. 儿童基于不同线索的所有权判断及其文化差异. 心理科学进展,2016,24(12):1889-1896 CSCD被引 4    
3.  Bertram C. Property in the moral life of humans. Social Philosophy and Policy,2014,30(1/2):404-424 CSCD被引 1    
4.  Blake P R. Children's understanding of ownership transfers. Cognitive Development,2009,24(2):133-145 CSCD被引 2    
5.  Blumenthal J A. "To be human" A psychological perspective on property law. Tulane Law Review,2009,83:1-56 CSCD被引 1    
6.  Brosnan S F. Property in nonhuman primates. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development,2011,132:9-22 CSCD被引 1    
7.  Chen X Y. Judgments of damage to public versus private property in Chinese children at different historical times. Developmental Science,2016,21(1):e12506 CSCD被引 1    
8.  Cram F. Children's endorsement of ownership attributes. Journal of Economic Psychology,1989,10:63-75 CSCD被引 1    
9.  Corlatean T. Characteristics of the public and private property right. Romanian Statistical Review,2012,60(2):301-305 CSCD被引 1    
10.  DeScioli P. The territorial foundations of human property. Evolution and Human Behavior,2011,32(5):297-304 CSCD被引 1    
11.  Dixon S. Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! Object requests,ownership and entitlement in a children's play session. Journal of Pragmatics,2015,82:39-51 CSCD被引 1    
12.  Friedman O. Twenty-one reasons to care about the psychological basis of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development,2011,132:1-8 CSCD被引 1    
13.  Gelman S A. Children Seek Historical Traces of Owned Objects. Child Development,2016,87(1):239-255 CSCD被引 1    
14.  Gelman S A. Developing digital privacy: Children's moral judgments concerning mobile GPS devices. Child Development,2018,89(1):17-26 CSCD被引 1    
15.  Gelman S A. Tracking the actions and possessions of agents. Topics in Cognitive Science,2014,6(4):599-614 CSCD被引 1    
16.  Hitch G J. Visual working memory in young children. Memory & Cognition,1988,16(2):120-132 CSCD被引 1    
17.  Hohfeld W H. Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied to judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal,1913,23(1):16-59 CSCD被引 2    
18.  Hook J. Judgments about the right to property from preschool to adulthood. Law and Human Behavior,1993,17(1):135-146 CSCD被引 4    
19.  Huh M. Young children's understanding of the limits and benefits of group ownership. Developmental Psychology,2017,53(4):686-697 CSCD被引 1    
20.  Kanngiesser P. Young children's understanding of ownership rights for newly made objects. Cognitive Development,2014,29:30-40 CSCD被引 3    
引证文献 1

1 李占星 意图信息在物权判断和道德判断中的作用 心理科学,2022,45(1):105-110
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号