喀斯特生态脆弱区休耕地的空间配置研究——以贵州省晴隆县为例
Spatial allocation of fallow land in karst rocky desertification areas: A case study in Qinglong County, Guizhou Province
查看参考文献45篇
文摘
|
实行耕地轮作休耕不仅是促进耕地休养生息、加快生态文明建设的重要任务,也是提高农业供给体系质量、实现农业与社会经济可持续发展的重要途径。本文从喀斯特生态脆弱区的人地关系特点出发,围绕休耕的目标导向及约束条件,厘定休耕地空间配置的逻辑内涵,在此基础上以国家休耕试点县——贵州省晴隆县为例,综合运用VSD脆弱性评估框架、灰色预测模型GM(1, 1)和GIS空间分析等方法,通过休耕地初判、休耕地修正、休耕地优选三个步骤实现休耕地的分区布局,据此探讨喀斯特生态脆弱区休耕地空间配置的实现路径与技术方法。结果表明:①晴隆县耕地生态系统脆弱性较强,全县70%以上的耕地非常脆弱甚至极度脆弱,急需优化耕地利用方式,促进耕地生态修复。②以粮食安全约束下的耕地保有量作为休耕规模的约束条件,依据耕地生态系统脆弱性由大到小进行筛选,得出晴隆县2015-2020年可休耕耕地规模共计13540.05 hm2,占全县耕地面积的37.18%。③根据休耕规模、耕地质量、地形地貌、交通区位、社会经济发展水平等方面的差异,晴隆县休耕地可按“三级五类”进行分区布局,具体布局休耕项目时要因地制宜,制定差异化的休耕模式及休耕组织方式。④休耕地的空间配置是一个“对象”和“规模”双重约束下的休耕地块优选问题,在此过程中,休耕对象诊断是基础,规模预测是约束,休耕项目布局是最终落脚点。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Fallow is important to promote the recuperation of cultivated land and enhance the sustainable development of agriculture and society. To examine the direction of fallow, this paper developed a conceptual framework and logical process to select fallow regions. First, the fallow regions were selected by diagnosing the cultivated land vulnerability using the VSD model, grey GM(1, 1) model and GIS spatial analysis methods. Second, the fallow scales were revised based on the restriction of cultivated land quantity. Third, the fallow regions were determined in ecological vulnerable karst areas. The results indicate that: (1) The farmland ecosystem in Qinglong County is in quite a dire state, with more than 70% of arable land in the county classified as very vulnerable or extremely vulnerable. Improvement of the land use pattern through fallowing is urgently needed to promote restoration of the ecosystem. (2) Under the constraints of food security, the fallow areas reach 13540.05 ha in the period of 2015-2020, or 37.18% of cultivated land in the county. (3) According to the fallow area, quality, landforms, and location of cultivated land and socioeconomic development levels, the fallow regions in Qinglong can be divided into three "grades" and five "types", which can be converted to the fallow land in the future. The implementation of fallow policies should consider the local conditions, so as to formulate different fallow modes and organizational form. (4) The fallow region-selecting is an optimizing process of fallow based on the two constraints of "object" and "scale". In the process, identification is the base, scale prediction is the constraint and implementation of fallow project is the final product. |
来源
|
地理学报
,2018,73(11):2250-2266 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201811015
|
关键词
|
休耕
;
生态脆弱性
;
粮食安全
;
空间配置
;
喀斯特地区
;
晴隆县
|
地址
|
1.
西南大学地理科学学院, 重庆, 400715
2.
岩溶环境重庆市重点实验室, 岩溶环境重庆市重点实验室, 重庆, 400715
3.
南宁市社会科学院, 南宁, 530022
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家社会科学基金重大项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6364815
|
参考文献 共
45
共3页
|
1.
Yang H. Spatio-temporal variations of health costs caused by chemical fertilizer utilization in China from 1990 to 2012.
Sustainability,2017,9(9):1505
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Yang H. China's soil plan needs strong support.
Nature,2016,536(7067):375-375
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Liu Y. Environmental effects of land-use/cover change caused by urbanization and policies in Southwest China Karst area: A case study of Guiyang.
Habitat International,2014,44:339-348
|
CSCD被引
35
次
|
|
|
|
4.
龙花楼. 中国耕地和农村宅基地利用转型耦合分析.
地理学报,2012,67(2):201-210
|
CSCD被引
66
次
|
|
|
|
5.
宋小青. 论土地利用转型的研究框架.
地理学报,2017,72(3):471-487
|
CSCD被引
127
次
|
|
|
|
6.
杨庆媛. 欧美及东亚地区耕地轮作休耕制度实践:对比与启示.
中国土地科学,2017,31(4):71-79
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Fraser R. Moral hazard and risk management in agri-environmental policy.
Journal of Agriculture Economics,2002,53(3):475-487
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Gilg A W. Quality farm food in Europe: A possible alternative to the industrialised food market and to current agri-environmental policies: Lessons from France.
Food Policy,1998,23(1):25-40
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Reimer A. One federal policy, four different policy contexts: An examination of agri-environmental policy implementation in the Midwestern United States.
Land Use Policy,2014,38(4):605-614
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Zellei A. Agri-environmental policy systems in transition and preparation for EU membership.
Land Use Policy,2005,22(3):225-234
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Cai R. The impacts of crop yield and price volatility on producers' cropping patterns: A dynamic optimal crop rotation model.
Agricultural Systems,2013,116(116):52-59
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Hodge I. Beyond agri-environmental policy: Towards an alternative model of rural environmental governance.
Land Use Policy,2001,18(2):99-111
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
13.
江娟丽. 耕地休耕的研究进展与现实借鉴.
西南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,39(1):165-171
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
14.
邓琳璐. 休耕轮作对黑土酸化的影响.
水土保持学报,2013,27(3):184-188
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
15.
邢福. 我国草田轮作的历史、理论与实践概览.
草业学报,2011,20(3):245-255
|
CSCD被引
34
次
|
|
|
|
16.
尹珂. 三峡库区消落带农户生态休耕经济补偿意愿及影响因素研究.
地理科学,2015,35(9):1123-1129
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
17.
陈展图. 中国耕地休耕制度基本框架构建.
中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(12):126-136
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
18.
李凡凡. 中国粮食安全保障前提下耕地休耕潜力初探.
中国农学通报,2014,30(增刊):35-41
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
19.
赵雲泰. 区域虚拟休耕规模与空间布局研究.
水土保持通报,2011,31(5):107-111
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
20.
张信宝. 西南喀斯特山地水土流失特点及有关石漠化的几个科学问题.
中国岩溶,2010,29(3):274-279
|
CSCD被引
85
次
|
|
|
|
|